Deficiency workflow: Utilizing electronic medical records to improve compliance with point-of-care ultrasound documentation

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Courtney M. Smalley MD , Molly Gourash MS , Brittany Rooney MD , Drew Mastrangelo EMT-P , McKinsey R. Muir MHSA , Cynthia Steppenbacker CPC , Erin L. Simon DO , Jeffrey Ruwe MD
{"title":"Deficiency workflow: Utilizing electronic medical records to improve compliance with point-of-care ultrasound documentation","authors":"Courtney M. Smalley MD ,&nbsp;Molly Gourash MS ,&nbsp;Brittany Rooney MD ,&nbsp;Drew Mastrangelo EMT-P ,&nbsp;McKinsey R. Muir MHSA ,&nbsp;Cynthia Steppenbacker CPC ,&nbsp;Erin L. Simon DO ,&nbsp;Jeffrey Ruwe MD","doi":"10.1016/j.ajem.2025.04.062","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is a common modality utilized in emergency departments (EDs). Image acquisition and storage workflows have significantly improved. Saving POCUS images is considered standard of care. However, documentation compliance is a struggle for clinicians in the chaotic ED environment. We sought to implement a simple electronic medical record (EMR) deficiency workflow to improve capture of POCUS documentation and billing in a large healthcare setting.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A retrospective review of all POCUS studies across 12 EDs was performed from January 1 to December 31, 2023. All EDs utilized the same EMR with standardized workflow. Clinicians were recommended to complete charting within 48 h of patient disposition. A POCUS deficiency workflow was implemented on June 1, 2023 to improve compliance. Deficiency workflow was defined as automated in-basket messaging that appeared after POCUS order entry. Deficiency remained in the clinicians in-basket until procedure note was completed. We compared POCUS chart deficiencies for lack of procedural documentation. Descriptive statistics were performed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>5013 POCUS were reviewed during the study period, 42 % before and 58 % after implementation. There was a 3.0 % absolute reduction (CI 2.01 %, 3.97 %) in procedure note deficiency from the pre-intervention to post-intervention period, 4.44 %. to 1.45 %.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>A POCUS deficiency workflow improved documentation across our healthcare system. This directly improved billing of POCUS studies and decreased late chart notifications. This workflow can be implemented in any medical specialty that utilizes POCUS. We recommend large healthcare systems investigate similar workflows to improve documentation and billing of POCUS exams.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55536,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":"94 ","pages":"Pages 188-191"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S073567572500302X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is a common modality utilized in emergency departments (EDs). Image acquisition and storage workflows have significantly improved. Saving POCUS images is considered standard of care. However, documentation compliance is a struggle for clinicians in the chaotic ED environment. We sought to implement a simple electronic medical record (EMR) deficiency workflow to improve capture of POCUS documentation and billing in a large healthcare setting.

Methods

A retrospective review of all POCUS studies across 12 EDs was performed from January 1 to December 31, 2023. All EDs utilized the same EMR with standardized workflow. Clinicians were recommended to complete charting within 48 h of patient disposition. A POCUS deficiency workflow was implemented on June 1, 2023 to improve compliance. Deficiency workflow was defined as automated in-basket messaging that appeared after POCUS order entry. Deficiency remained in the clinicians in-basket until procedure note was completed. We compared POCUS chart deficiencies for lack of procedural documentation. Descriptive statistics were performed.

Results

5013 POCUS were reviewed during the study period, 42 % before and 58 % after implementation. There was a 3.0 % absolute reduction (CI 2.01 %, 3.97 %) in procedure note deficiency from the pre-intervention to post-intervention period, 4.44 %. to 1.45 %.

Conclusion

A POCUS deficiency workflow improved documentation across our healthcare system. This directly improved billing of POCUS studies and decreased late chart notifications. This workflow can be implemented in any medical specialty that utilizes POCUS. We recommend large healthcare systems investigate similar workflows to improve documentation and billing of POCUS exams.
不足的工作流程:利用电子医疗记录来提高对护理点超声文件的依从性
背景:即时超声(POCUS)是急诊科(EDs)常用的一种方式。图像采集和存储工作流程有了显著改善。保存POCUS图像被认为是标准的护理。然而,在混乱的急诊科环境中,文档遵从性是临床医生的一个斗争。我们试图实现一个简单的电子医疗记录(EMR)缺陷工作流,以改进大型医疗保健环境中POCUS文档和计费的捕获。方法回顾性分析2023年1月1日至12月31日12例急症患者的POCUS研究。所有的急诊室都使用了相同的EMR和标准化的工作流程。建议临床医生在患者处置后48小时内完成制图。为了提高合规性,POCUS缺陷工作流程于2023年6月1日实施。缺陷工作流被定义为在POCUS订单输入后出现的自动收文篮消息传递。在完成手术记录之前,缺陷一直存在于临床医生的档案中。我们比较了POCUS图缺乏程序性文件的缺陷。进行描述性统计。结果在研究期间对5013例POCUS进行了审查,其中实施前和实施后分别占42%和58%。从干预前到干预后,程序说明缺失绝对减少3.0% (CI 2.01%, 3.97%),减少4.44%。到1.45%。结论POCUS缺陷工作流程改善了整个医疗系统的文档记录。这直接改善了POCUS研究的计费,减少了后期图表通知。该工作流可以在任何使用POCUS的医学专业中实现。我们建议大型医疗保健系统调查类似的工作流程,以改进POCUS检查的文档和计费。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
5.60%
发文量
730
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: A distinctive blend of practicality and scholarliness makes the American Journal of Emergency Medicine a key source for information on emergency medical care. Covering all activities concerned with emergency medicine, it is the journal to turn to for information to help increase the ability to understand, recognize and treat emergency conditions. Issues contain clinical articles, case reports, review articles, editorials, international notes, book reviews and more.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信