Exploring the need for overdose prevention centers in England: A qualitative community-based participatory study on the perspectives of people who use drugs in public and semi-public environments

IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 SUBSTANCE ABUSE
Benjamin D. Scher , Mat Southwell , Magdalena Harris , Alex Stevens , Benjamin W. Chrisinger , David K. Humphreys , Gillian W. Shorter
{"title":"Exploring the need for overdose prevention centers in England: A qualitative community-based participatory study on the perspectives of people who use drugs in public and semi-public environments","authors":"Benjamin D. Scher ,&nbsp;Mat Southwell ,&nbsp;Magdalena Harris ,&nbsp;Alex Stevens ,&nbsp;Benjamin W. Chrisinger ,&nbsp;David K. Humphreys ,&nbsp;Gillian W. Shorter","doi":"10.1016/j.drugpo.2025.104816","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Overdose prevention centres (OPCs) have been implemented as a harm reduction response in around 20 countries; with one just opened in the UK. In a context of rising rates of drug-related deaths, this study aimed to assess the need for an OPC in Sandwell, England, by examining the experiences and perspectives of local people who use drugs.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Qualitative data were collected through three focus groups, 20 street-based interviews with people who use drugs, and observations from four ethnographic field sessions. This was a community-based participatory project and included community consultation during study design and peer researcher participation during data collection, analysis and dissemination.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Findings evidence how the threat of public and police interaction in semi-public drug use spaces leads to rushed injection practice, hampers poor venous access management, and increases risk of injection-related harms. Participants were enthusiastic about the concept of an OPC and its potential to reduce injecting-related risks, drug-related death, provide safety, and prevent traumatic experiences with police. Participants also highlighted concerns about negative public perceptions of their community, viewing an OPC as a potential solution to improving community relations by reducing drug-related litter.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>There is an urgent need for OPC implementation, given current risks from rushed injection practices, the lack of safe spaces, and the increasing presence of nitazenes and other unexpected contaminants in the UK drug supply. The assertion from local people who drugs that an OPC would be an appropriate and effective intervention requires prioritisation by policymakers.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48364,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Drug Policy","volume":"140 ","pages":"Article 104816"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Drug Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S095539592500115X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Overdose prevention centres (OPCs) have been implemented as a harm reduction response in around 20 countries; with one just opened in the UK. In a context of rising rates of drug-related deaths, this study aimed to assess the need for an OPC in Sandwell, England, by examining the experiences and perspectives of local people who use drugs.

Methods

Qualitative data were collected through three focus groups, 20 street-based interviews with people who use drugs, and observations from four ethnographic field sessions. This was a community-based participatory project and included community consultation during study design and peer researcher participation during data collection, analysis and dissemination.

Results

Findings evidence how the threat of public and police interaction in semi-public drug use spaces leads to rushed injection practice, hampers poor venous access management, and increases risk of injection-related harms. Participants were enthusiastic about the concept of an OPC and its potential to reduce injecting-related risks, drug-related death, provide safety, and prevent traumatic experiences with police. Participants also highlighted concerns about negative public perceptions of their community, viewing an OPC as a potential solution to improving community relations by reducing drug-related litter.

Conclusions

There is an urgent need for OPC implementation, given current risks from rushed injection practices, the lack of safe spaces, and the increasing presence of nitazenes and other unexpected contaminants in the UK drug supply. The assertion from local people who drugs that an OPC would be an appropriate and effective intervention requires prioritisation by policymakers.
探索英格兰过量预防中心的需求:一项定性的社区参与性研究,关于在公共和半公共环境中使用药物的人的观点
背景:在大约20个国家实施了过量预防中心(OPCs)作为减少危害的应对措施;其中一家刚刚在英国开业。在与毒品有关的死亡率不断上升的背景下,本研究旨在通过审查当地吸毒者的经验和观点,评估在英格兰桑德维尔设立一个禁止药物管制中心的必要性。方法通过3个焦点小组、20个吸毒者街头访谈和4个人种学现场会议的观察收集定性数据。这是一个以社区为基础的参与性项目,在研究设计期间包括社区咨询,在数据收集、分析和传播期间包括同行研究者的参与。结果研究结果表明,在半公开的吸毒场所,公众和警察的互动威胁如何导致匆忙的注射行为,阻碍了不良的静脉通路管理,并增加了注射相关危害的风险。与会者对OPC的概念及其在减少与注射有关的风险、与毒品有关的死亡、提供安全以及防止与警察接触的创伤经历方面的潜力表示热情。与会者还强调了对公众对其社区的负面看法的关注,认为OPC是通过减少与毒品有关的垃圾来改善社区关系的潜在解决方案。鉴于目前匆忙注射操作的风险、缺乏安全空间以及英国药品供应中nitazene和其他意想不到的污染物的增加,迫切需要实施OPC。当地吸毒者断言,OPC将是一种适当而有效的干预措施,这需要政策制定者优先考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
11.40%
发文量
307
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Drug Policy provides a forum for the dissemination of current research, reviews, debate, and critical analysis on drug use and drug policy in a global context. It seeks to publish material on the social, political, legal, and health contexts of psychoactive substance use, both licit and illicit. The journal is particularly concerned to explore the effects of drug policy and practice on drug-using behaviour and its health and social consequences. It is the policy of the journal to represent a wide range of material on drug-related matters from around the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信