Peter Q. Leung, Eslam A. Elghonaimy, Ahmed M. Elamir, Megan Wachsmann, Song Zhang, Neha Barrows, Hollis Notgrass, Ethan Johnson, Cheryl M. Lewis, Rachel von Ebers, Cassandra Hamilton, Samy Castillo-Flores, Ricardo E. Nunez-Rocha, Grace Josephson, Zhikai Chi, Salwan Al Mutar, Patricio M. Polanco, Nina N. Sanford, Syed M. Ali Kazmi, Matthew R. Porembka, David Hsiehchen, Adam C. Yopp, John C. Mansour, Muhammad S. Beg, Herbert J. Zeh, Todd A. Aguilera
{"title":"Presurgical ablative radiation is associated with local control and immune response in pancreatic cancer","authors":"Peter Q. Leung, Eslam A. Elghonaimy, Ahmed M. Elamir, Megan Wachsmann, Song Zhang, Neha Barrows, Hollis Notgrass, Ethan Johnson, Cheryl M. Lewis, Rachel von Ebers, Cassandra Hamilton, Samy Castillo-Flores, Ricardo E. Nunez-Rocha, Grace Josephson, Zhikai Chi, Salwan Al Mutar, Patricio M. Polanco, Nina N. Sanford, Syed M. Ali Kazmi, Matthew R. Porembka, David Hsiehchen, Adam C. Yopp, John C. Mansour, Muhammad S. Beg, Herbert J. Zeh, Todd A. Aguilera","doi":"10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-24-3582","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: To compare outcomes and molecular characteristics of patients who had surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, with and without ablative radiotherapy (SAbR) for pancreas cancer. Insight could clarify the benefits of SAbR and provide molecular guidance for future therapeutic regimens. Experimental Design: This single-institution, tertiary care academic center cohort study included all patients diagnosed with pancreatic cancer between 2012–2023 treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy, with or without SAbR. We compared therapeutic responses, performed patient matching, and conducted Cox modeling to identify differences between groups. We assessed molecular response using RNA sequencing to identify SAbR-induced biologic differences. Results: Among 133 patients receiving chemotherapy and 48 receiving chemotherapy + SAbR, RNA sequencing was available for 29 and 14 patients, respectively. Despite more advanced baseline disease, the SAbR group showed better post-treatment pathology and similar overall survival (HR = 0.97, 95% CI = 0.58–1.60, P = .9). Patient matching indicated that SAbR improved locoregional recurrence-free survival (HR = 0.24, 95% CI = 0.07–0.88, P = .009). Arterial involvement raised local failure risk with chemotherapy alone (HR = 3.37, 95% CI = 1.74–6.54, P < .001), which was significantly reduced with SAbR (HR = 0.28; 95% CI = 0.12–0.68; P = .005). Gene set enrichment analysis showed immune activation, with CD8 and NK/NKT cell signatures associated with local control and Treg signatures associated with worse control. Conclusion: Neoadjuvant SAbR is associated with improved pathological outcomes, enhanced local control, and maintained survival while inducing a distinct immune response. Well-powered studies are needed to clarify its clinical benefits.","PeriodicalId":10279,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Cancer Research","volume":"44 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Cancer Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-24-3582","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: To compare outcomes and molecular characteristics of patients who had surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, with and without ablative radiotherapy (SAbR) for pancreas cancer. Insight could clarify the benefits of SAbR and provide molecular guidance for future therapeutic regimens. Experimental Design: This single-institution, tertiary care academic center cohort study included all patients diagnosed with pancreatic cancer between 2012–2023 treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy, with or without SAbR. We compared therapeutic responses, performed patient matching, and conducted Cox modeling to identify differences between groups. We assessed molecular response using RNA sequencing to identify SAbR-induced biologic differences. Results: Among 133 patients receiving chemotherapy and 48 receiving chemotherapy + SAbR, RNA sequencing was available for 29 and 14 patients, respectively. Despite more advanced baseline disease, the SAbR group showed better post-treatment pathology and similar overall survival (HR = 0.97, 95% CI = 0.58–1.60, P = .9). Patient matching indicated that SAbR improved locoregional recurrence-free survival (HR = 0.24, 95% CI = 0.07–0.88, P = .009). Arterial involvement raised local failure risk with chemotherapy alone (HR = 3.37, 95% CI = 1.74–6.54, P < .001), which was significantly reduced with SAbR (HR = 0.28; 95% CI = 0.12–0.68; P = .005). Gene set enrichment analysis showed immune activation, with CD8 and NK/NKT cell signatures associated with local control and Treg signatures associated with worse control. Conclusion: Neoadjuvant SAbR is associated with improved pathological outcomes, enhanced local control, and maintained survival while inducing a distinct immune response. Well-powered studies are needed to clarify its clinical benefits.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Cancer Research is a journal focusing on groundbreaking research in cancer, specifically in the areas where the laboratory and the clinic intersect. Our primary interest lies in clinical trials that investigate novel treatments, accompanied by research on pharmacology, molecular alterations, and biomarkers that can predict response or resistance to these treatments. Furthermore, we prioritize laboratory and animal studies that explore new drugs and targeted agents with the potential to advance to clinical trials. We also encourage research on targetable mechanisms of cancer development, progression, and metastasis.