Gender Differences in Case Volume Among Ophthalmology Resident Graduates, 2014-2023.

IF 7.8 1区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Susan M Culican,Misha F Syed,Yoon Soo Park,Sean O Hogan
{"title":"Gender Differences in Case Volume Among Ophthalmology Resident Graduates, 2014-2023.","authors":"Susan M Culican,Misha F Syed,Yoon Soo Park,Sean O Hogan","doi":"10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2025.0935","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Importance\r\nA previous multisite study found gender differences in cataract and total surgical volume among US residency programs. Whether that was representative of all ophthalmology residents in the US is unclear.\r\n\r\nObjective\r\nTo determine whether reported surgical volume among US ophthalmology resident graduates varied by self-reported gender or by underrepresented in medicine (URiM) status.\r\n\r\nDesign, Setting, and Participants\r\nRetrospective observational longitudinal cohort study of deidentified Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) surgical log data for all graduates of US ophthalmology residency programs from the years 2014-2023 compared by self-reported gender or URiM status. Surgical experience was obtained from the ACGME Accreditation Data System resident case log. Data were analyzed from November 2023 to April 2024.\r\n\r\nMain Outcomes and Measures\r\nThe main outcome was a difference in mean reported surgical volume between comparison groups by gender or URiM status for cataract or total surgical procedures. The secondary outcomes were differences for other surgical categories by gender or URiM status.\r\n\r\nResults\r\nOf 4811 resident graduates, 41.6% (1999) were female and 58.4% were male (2812); 7.1% (343) self-identified as URiM. Cataract cases had a mean difference of -4.4% (-8.3 of 189.2) (95% CI, -6.4% to -2.4%; P < .001) fewer surgeries for female residents than male residents over the 10-year study, and total procedures had a mean difference of -7.4% (-43.4 of 587.3) (95% CI, -9.7% to -5.1%; P < .001) fewer surgeries for female than male residents over the 10-year study. URiM status over the same time period was not associated with a difference in cataract surgeries but was associated with a mean difference of -5.3% (-31.5 of 587.3) (95% CI, -9.8% to -0.9%; P = .02) fewer total procedures.\r\n\r\nConclusions and Relevance\r\nIn this study, female residents reported fewer cataract procedures than male residents from 2014-2023. Female and URiM residents reported fewer total procedures than their nonfemale or non-URiM colleagues. Future studies to assess the causes of these disparities are warranted.","PeriodicalId":14518,"journal":{"name":"JAMA ophthalmology","volume":"21 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2025.0935","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance A previous multisite study found gender differences in cataract and total surgical volume among US residency programs. Whether that was representative of all ophthalmology residents in the US is unclear. Objective To determine whether reported surgical volume among US ophthalmology resident graduates varied by self-reported gender or by underrepresented in medicine (URiM) status. Design, Setting, and Participants Retrospective observational longitudinal cohort study of deidentified Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) surgical log data for all graduates of US ophthalmology residency programs from the years 2014-2023 compared by self-reported gender or URiM status. Surgical experience was obtained from the ACGME Accreditation Data System resident case log. Data were analyzed from November 2023 to April 2024. Main Outcomes and Measures The main outcome was a difference in mean reported surgical volume between comparison groups by gender or URiM status for cataract or total surgical procedures. The secondary outcomes were differences for other surgical categories by gender or URiM status. Results Of 4811 resident graduates, 41.6% (1999) were female and 58.4% were male (2812); 7.1% (343) self-identified as URiM. Cataract cases had a mean difference of -4.4% (-8.3 of 189.2) (95% CI, -6.4% to -2.4%; P < .001) fewer surgeries for female residents than male residents over the 10-year study, and total procedures had a mean difference of -7.4% (-43.4 of 587.3) (95% CI, -9.7% to -5.1%; P < .001) fewer surgeries for female than male residents over the 10-year study. URiM status over the same time period was not associated with a difference in cataract surgeries but was associated with a mean difference of -5.3% (-31.5 of 587.3) (95% CI, -9.8% to -0.9%; P = .02) fewer total procedures. Conclusions and Relevance In this study, female residents reported fewer cataract procedures than male residents from 2014-2023. Female and URiM residents reported fewer total procedures than their nonfemale or non-URiM colleagues. Future studies to assess the causes of these disparities are warranted.
2014-2023年眼科住院医师毕业生病例量的性别差异
先前的一项多地点研究发现,在美国住院医师项目中,白内障和总手术量存在性别差异。目前尚不清楚这是否代表了美国所有眼科住院医生的情况。目的确定美国眼科住院医师毕业生报告的手术量是否因自我报告的性别或医学代表性不足(URiM)状况而异。设计、环境和参与者:对2014-2023年美国眼科住院医师培训项目所有毕业生的外科日志数据进行回顾性观察性纵向队列研究,比较其自我报告的性别或URiM状态。手术经验从ACGME认证数据系统的住院病例日志中获得。数据分析时间为2023年11月至2024年4月。主要结局和措施主要结局是按性别或URiM状况分组的白内障或全手术手术组间平均报告手术量的差异。次要结局是其他手术类别按性别或URiM状态的差异。结果4811名常住毕业生中,女性占41.6%(1999年),男性占58.4%(2812人);7.1%(343人)认为自己是URiM。白内障病例的平均差异为-4.4% (-8.3 / 189.2)(95% CI, -6.4% ~ -2.4%;P < 0.001),在10年的研究中,女性住院医生的手术次数少于男性住院医生,总手术次数的平均差异为-7.4% (-43.4 / 587.3)(95% CI, -9.7%至-5.1%;P < 0.001),在10年的研究中,女性住院医师的手术数量少于男性住院医师。同一时期的URiM状况与白内障手术的差异无关,但与-5.3%(-31.5 / 587.3)的平均差异相关(95% CI, -9.8%至-0.9%;P = .02)总手术次数较少。在本研究中,2014-2023年,女性住院医生报告的白内障手术数量少于男性住院医生。女性和URiM住院医生报告的总手术次数少于非女性或非URiM同事。未来有必要进行研究,以评估这些差异的原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JAMA ophthalmology
JAMA ophthalmology OPHTHALMOLOGY-
CiteScore
13.20
自引率
3.70%
发文量
340
期刊介绍: JAMA Ophthalmology, with a rich history of continuous publication since 1869, stands as a distinguished international, peer-reviewed journal dedicated to ophthalmology and visual science. In 2019, the journal proudly commemorated 150 years of uninterrupted service to the field. As a member of the esteemed JAMA Network, a consortium renowned for its peer-reviewed general medical and specialty publications, JAMA Ophthalmology upholds the highest standards of excellence in disseminating cutting-edge research and insights. Join us in celebrating our legacy and advancing the frontiers of ophthalmology and visual science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信