Development of computable guidelines: GIN McMaster guideline development checklist extension for computable guidelines

Chirine Chehab, Stacy Lathrop, Christopher G. Harrod, James Kariuki, Derek Ritz, Maria Michaels
{"title":"Development of computable guidelines: GIN McMaster guideline development checklist extension for computable guidelines","authors":"Chirine Chehab,&nbsp;Stacy Lathrop,&nbsp;Christopher G. Harrod,&nbsp;James Kariuki,&nbsp;Derek Ritz,&nbsp;Maria Michaels","doi":"10.1002/gin2.70023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Transforming Clinical Practice Guideline (CPG) recommendations into computer readable language is a complex and ongoing process that requires significant resources, including time, expertise, and funds. The objective is to provide an extension of the widely used GIN-McMaster Guideline Development Checklist (GDC) and Tool for the development of computable guidelines (CGs).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Based on an outcome from the Human Centered Design (HCD) workshop hosted by the Guidelines International Network North America (GIN-NA), a team was formed to develop the checklist extension. The team included guideline developers, researchers, implementers, and informaticists who reviewed the GDC and developed a list of additional requirements to help guideline developers author clearer, more implementable narrative guideline recommendations (referred to as knowledge level 1, or L1 recommendations) and ensure conformance-testable attributes of the different artifacts of clinical guideline recommendations. The team vetted this list with guideline development organizations and health informatics experts to validate it, for clarity, usability, and effectiveness. The team used an iterative process to determine the final extension components for CG development guidance.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The team identified nine components that complement the topics included in GDC for developing, implementing, and adopting CG recommendations.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>This study demonstrates that the defined principles in the L1 Checklist, grounded in current guideline development standards, may significantly enhance the writing, development, and implementation of computable recommendations. Collaboration among guideline developers, implementers, and informaticists from the outset is crucial for achieving effective integration of these guidelines into clinical workflows. Future work should focus on assessing this extension within various ongoing learning initiatives and point-of-care digitization efforts, including the scholarly communications ecosystem and learning health systems, to further improve healthcare delivery.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":100266,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Public Health Guidelines","volume":"2 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/gin2.70023","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Public Health Guidelines","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/gin2.70023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Transforming Clinical Practice Guideline (CPG) recommendations into computer readable language is a complex and ongoing process that requires significant resources, including time, expertise, and funds. The objective is to provide an extension of the widely used GIN-McMaster Guideline Development Checklist (GDC) and Tool for the development of computable guidelines (CGs).

Methods

Based on an outcome from the Human Centered Design (HCD) workshop hosted by the Guidelines International Network North America (GIN-NA), a team was formed to develop the checklist extension. The team included guideline developers, researchers, implementers, and informaticists who reviewed the GDC and developed a list of additional requirements to help guideline developers author clearer, more implementable narrative guideline recommendations (referred to as knowledge level 1, or L1 recommendations) and ensure conformance-testable attributes of the different artifacts of clinical guideline recommendations. The team vetted this list with guideline development organizations and health informatics experts to validate it, for clarity, usability, and effectiveness. The team used an iterative process to determine the final extension components for CG development guidance.

Results

The team identified nine components that complement the topics included in GDC for developing, implementing, and adopting CG recommendations.

Conclusion

This study demonstrates that the defined principles in the L1 Checklist, grounded in current guideline development standards, may significantly enhance the writing, development, and implementation of computable recommendations. Collaboration among guideline developers, implementers, and informaticists from the outset is crucial for achieving effective integration of these guidelines into clinical workflows. Future work should focus on assessing this extension within various ongoing learning initiatives and point-of-care digitization efforts, including the scholarly communications ecosystem and learning health systems, to further improve healthcare delivery.

Abstract Image

可计算指南的开发:GIN麦克马斯特指南开发清单扩展可计算指南
将临床实践指南(CPG)建议转化为计算机可读语言是一个复杂且持续的过程,需要大量资源,包括时间、专业知识和资金。目标是提供广泛使用的GIN-McMaster指南开发清单(GDC)和可计算指南(cg)开发工具的扩展。方法根据北美指南国际网络(GIN-NA)主办的以人为中心的设计(HCD)研讨会的结果,成立了一个团队来开发清单扩展。该团队包括指南开发人员、研究人员、实现者和信息学家,他们审查了GDC,并制定了一份额外的需求列表,以帮助指南开发人员编写更清晰、更可实现的叙述性指南建议(称为知识水平1,或L1建议),并确保临床指南建议的不同工件的一致性可测试属性。该团队与指南制定组织和卫生信息学专家一起审查了这份清单,以验证其清晰度、可用性和有效性。团队使用迭代过程来确定CG开发指导的最终扩展组件。团队确定了九个组成部分,以补充GDC中包含的主题,用于开发、实施和采用CG建议。结论:本研究表明,基于现行指南制定标准,L1清单中定义的原则可以显著提高可计算建议的写作、发展和实施。指南开发者、实施者和信息学家之间的协作从一开始就对实现这些指南与临床工作流程的有效整合至关重要。未来的工作应侧重于评估各种正在进行的学习计划和护理点数字化工作中的这种扩展,包括学术交流生态系统和学习卫生系统,以进一步改善医疗保健服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信