Identifying potential genetic counseling program applicant competencies

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Alexis Gallant, Erin Carmany, Angela Trepanier
{"title":"Identifying potential genetic counseling program applicant competencies","authors":"Alexis Gallant,&nbsp;Erin Carmany,&nbsp;Angela Trepanier","doi":"10.1002/jgc4.70020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Genetic counseling (GC) program admission is highly competitive. Developing applicant competencies, like the Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC) has done, could help genetic counseling applicants better identify the knowledge, skills, and personal qualities programs seek. The purpose of this qualitative focus group study was to develop a set of draft GC program applicant competencies and then compare them with those established by the AAMC. We developed a semi-structured interview guide that included questions about GC application requirements, the reason for each requirement, and how important each was in evaluating an applicant. These were followed by questions that asked to what extent the medical school applicant competencies aligned with what GC programs were looking for in applicants, and overall thoughts about developing applicant competencies. Focus group participants, which could include program leadership and admissions committee members, were recruited through the Association of Genetic Counseling Program Directors' listserv. Four virtual focus groups were held between December 2020 and February 2021. Fifteen people participated, representing 13 of 50 programs. One investigator conducted the focus group session while the other two investigators took notes. Each focus group session was recorded and then transcribed verbatim. The transcripts and notes were reviewed by each investigator independently to generate themes (applicant competencies) using reflexive thematic analysis. Draft themes were reviewed, discussed, and refined, using two rounds of an iterative process. The draft set of competencies was then sent to focus group participants for review. Comments were submitted by six participants representing all four focus groups and were incorporated. Thirteen competencies, reflective of the baseline knowledge, skills, and personal qualities sought in genetic counseling applicants, were identified: Foundation in Basic Science and Genetics, Insight into the Profession, Academic Ability, Capacity for Self-Awareness, Interpersonal Skills, Communication Skills, Critical Thinking and Reasoning, Teamwork, Cultural Humility, Professional Attributes, Capacity to Value and Support Diverse Perspectives, Capacity for Growth, and Commitment to Helping Others. These competencies significantly overlap with medical school applicant competencies but also reflect unique aspects of the GC profession. Additional research to evaluate this set of competencies and the pros and cons of using them in GC admissions is needed. We believe that this work serves as a starting place to promote transparency in GC admissions.</p>","PeriodicalId":54829,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Genetic Counseling","volume":"34 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jgc4.70020","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Genetic Counseling","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jgc4.70020","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Genetic counseling (GC) program admission is highly competitive. Developing applicant competencies, like the Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC) has done, could help genetic counseling applicants better identify the knowledge, skills, and personal qualities programs seek. The purpose of this qualitative focus group study was to develop a set of draft GC program applicant competencies and then compare them with those established by the AAMC. We developed a semi-structured interview guide that included questions about GC application requirements, the reason for each requirement, and how important each was in evaluating an applicant. These were followed by questions that asked to what extent the medical school applicant competencies aligned with what GC programs were looking for in applicants, and overall thoughts about developing applicant competencies. Focus group participants, which could include program leadership and admissions committee members, were recruited through the Association of Genetic Counseling Program Directors' listserv. Four virtual focus groups were held between December 2020 and February 2021. Fifteen people participated, representing 13 of 50 programs. One investigator conducted the focus group session while the other two investigators took notes. Each focus group session was recorded and then transcribed verbatim. The transcripts and notes were reviewed by each investigator independently to generate themes (applicant competencies) using reflexive thematic analysis. Draft themes were reviewed, discussed, and refined, using two rounds of an iterative process. The draft set of competencies was then sent to focus group participants for review. Comments were submitted by six participants representing all four focus groups and were incorporated. Thirteen competencies, reflective of the baseline knowledge, skills, and personal qualities sought in genetic counseling applicants, were identified: Foundation in Basic Science and Genetics, Insight into the Profession, Academic Ability, Capacity for Self-Awareness, Interpersonal Skills, Communication Skills, Critical Thinking and Reasoning, Teamwork, Cultural Humility, Professional Attributes, Capacity to Value and Support Diverse Perspectives, Capacity for Growth, and Commitment to Helping Others. These competencies significantly overlap with medical school applicant competencies but also reflect unique aspects of the GC profession. Additional research to evaluate this set of competencies and the pros and cons of using them in GC admissions is needed. We believe that this work serves as a starting place to promote transparency in GC admissions.

识别潜在的遗传咨询项目申请人的能力
遗传咨询(GC)项目的入学竞争非常激烈。培养申请人的能力,就像美国医学院协会(AAMC)所做的那样,可以帮助遗传咨询申请人更好地识别项目所寻求的知识、技能和个人素质。这项定性焦点小组研究的目的是制定一套GC计划申请人的能力草案,然后将其与AAMC建立的能力进行比较。我们开发了一个半结构化的面试指南,其中包括有关GC应用程序需求、每个需求的原因以及每个需求在评估申请人时的重要性的问题。接下来的问题是,医学院申请人的能力在多大程度上符合GC项目对申请人的要求,以及对培养申请人能力的总体看法。焦点小组的参与者可能包括项目领导和招生委员会成员,他们是通过遗传咨询项目主任协会的名单系统招募的。2020年12月至2021年2月期间举行了四次虚拟焦点小组讨论。15人参加,代表了50个项目中的13个。一名调查人员主持焦点小组会议,另外两名调查人员做笔记。每个焦点小组的会议都被记录下来,然后逐字抄录。每位研究者独立审查笔录和笔记,使用反身性主题分析生成主题(申请人能力)。通过两轮迭代过程,对主题草案进行了审查、讨论和改进。然后将一套能力草案送交焦点小组与会者审查。代表所有四个焦点小组的六名与会者提交了意见,并纳入其中。确定了13项能力,反映了遗传咨询申请人所寻求的基本知识,技能和个人素质:基础科学和遗传学基础、专业洞察力、学术能力、自我意识能力、人际交往能力、沟通能力、批判性思维和推理能力、团队合作能力、文化谦逊、专业属性、重视和支持不同观点的能力、成长能力和帮助他人的承诺。这些能力与医学院申请人的能力显著重叠,但也反映了GC职业的独特方面。需要更多的研究来评估这组能力以及在GC录取中使用它们的利弊。我们相信这项工作可以作为促进GC录取透明度的起点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Genetic Counseling
Journal of Genetic Counseling GENETICS & HEREDITY-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
26.30%
发文量
113
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Genetic Counseling (JOGC), published for the National Society of Genetic Counselors, is a timely, international forum addressing all aspects of the discipline and practice of genetic counseling. The journal focuses on the critical questions and problems that arise at the interface between rapidly advancing technological developments and the concerns of individuals and communities at genetic risk. The publication provides genetic counselors, other clinicians and health educators, laboratory geneticists, bioethicists, legal scholars, social scientists, and other researchers with a premier resource on genetic counseling topics in national, international, and cross-national contexts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信