Safety Evaluation of Surgical Staple Line Reinforcement in Glissonean Stapling: A Preliminary Study in Porcine Liver

IF 0.9 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS
Kan Toriguchi, Satoshi Kaihara, Masatoh Narita, Tatsuki Ishikawa, Masashi Saji, Nobu Oshima, Masato Kondo, Hiroyuki Kobayashi, Kenji Uryuhara
{"title":"Safety Evaluation of Surgical Staple Line Reinforcement in Glissonean Stapling: A Preliminary Study in Porcine Liver","authors":"Kan Toriguchi,&nbsp;Satoshi Kaihara,&nbsp;Masatoh Narita,&nbsp;Tatsuki Ishikawa,&nbsp;Masashi Saji,&nbsp;Nobu Oshima,&nbsp;Masato Kondo,&nbsp;Hiroyuki Kobayashi,&nbsp;Kenji Uryuhara","doi":"10.1111/ases.70070","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Laparoscopic liver resection is an established surgical technique utilizing automatic staplers; however, the safety of extrahepatic Glissonean pedicle transection in this context remains unclear. This study evaluated the safety and pressure resistance of surgical staple line reinforcement in Glissonean stapling using a porcine liver model.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>The Glissonean sheath was stapled with either Tri-Staple or staple line reinforcement, and artificial blood was infused into the hepatic artery. Pressures were gradually increased up to 1000 mmHg to assess leakage from the resection margin.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>No leakage was observed in staple line reinforcement-treated sheaths, even at pressures exceeding 1000 mmHg, whereas Tri-Staple-treated sheaths leaked at a median pressure of 428.5 mmHg.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>These findings suggest that staple line reinforcement provides superior sealing performance, reducing intraoperative bleeding risks and eliminating the need for additional reinforcement. Further studies involving live models are necessary to confirm these results and establish clinical applicability.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47019,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Endoscopic Surgery","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Endoscopic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ases.70070","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Laparoscopic liver resection is an established surgical technique utilizing automatic staplers; however, the safety of extrahepatic Glissonean pedicle transection in this context remains unclear. This study evaluated the safety and pressure resistance of surgical staple line reinforcement in Glissonean stapling using a porcine liver model.

Methods

The Glissonean sheath was stapled with either Tri-Staple or staple line reinforcement, and artificial blood was infused into the hepatic artery. Pressures were gradually increased up to 1000 mmHg to assess leakage from the resection margin.

Results

No leakage was observed in staple line reinforcement-treated sheaths, even at pressures exceeding 1000 mmHg, whereas Tri-Staple-treated sheaths leaked at a median pressure of 428.5 mmHg.

Conclusions

These findings suggest that staple line reinforcement provides superior sealing performance, reducing intraoperative bleeding risks and eliminating the need for additional reinforcement. Further studies involving live models are necessary to confirm these results and establish clinical applicability.

猪肝格利索内钉手术钉线加固安全性的初步研究
腹腔镜肝切除术是一种利用自动吻合器的成熟手术技术;然而,肝外Glissonean蒂横断在这种情况下的安全性仍不清楚。本研究使用猪肝模型评估外科钉线加固Glissonean吻合术的安全性和耐压性。方法采用三钉钉或钉线加固的方法缝合格利索内鞘,并在肝动脉内灌注人工血液。压力逐渐增加至1000 mmHg以评估切除边缘的渗漏。结果:即使在超过1000 mmHg的压力下,短钉线增强处理的鞘也未观察到泄漏,而三短钉处理的鞘在428.5 mmHg的中位压力下也未观察到泄漏。结论:钉线加固具有良好的缝合性能,可降低术中出血风险,无需额外加固。需要进一步的活体模型研究来证实这些结果并建立临床适用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
10.00%
发文量
129
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信