The user experience in industrial human-robot interaction: A comparative analysis of Unimodal and Multimodal interfaces for disassembly tasks

IF 9.1 1区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Ainhoa Apraiz, Ganix Lasa, Maitane Mazmela, Nestor Arana-Arexolaleiba, Íñigo Elguea, Oscar Escallada, Nagore Osa, Amaia Etxabe
{"title":"The user experience in industrial human-robot interaction: A comparative analysis of Unimodal and Multimodal interfaces for disassembly tasks","authors":"Ainhoa Apraiz,&nbsp;Ganix Lasa,&nbsp;Maitane Mazmela,&nbsp;Nestor Arana-Arexolaleiba,&nbsp;Íñigo Elguea,&nbsp;Oscar Escallada,&nbsp;Nagore Osa,&nbsp;Amaia Etxabe","doi":"10.1016/j.rcim.2025.103045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In the Industry 5.0 context, ensuring effective Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) is key to supporting human involvement in production processes. Interfaces are the foundation of this collaboration and serve as vital communication channels which bridge the gap between users and robotic systems. This study compares unimodal and multimodal interfaces and their impact on user experience (UX) in an HRI context. Unimodal interfaces, while simplifying implementation, may restrict the richness of communication, while multimodal interfaces provide detailed and flexible interaction, enhancing the conveyance of complex information. However, designing effective multimodal interfaces presents challenges due to their inherent complexity in managing multiple modalities. This paper presents an HRI disassembly case study comparing the impact of these interfaces on the UX. A methodological approach was used to monitor operator performance, physiological responses, and perceptual responses. An electroencephalogram was employed to objectively record the operators’ emotional responses of operators without interrupting or hindering the process. Twenty participants (10 men and 10 women) were involved in the study. The results indicate that levels of memorization and mental workload are lower when using the multimodal interface, a finding consistent across men and women. These findings suggest that the multimodal interface is an appropriate choice, not only for reducing memorization and mental workload levels, but also for its inclusive approach. This aligns with the objectives of Industry 5.0, promoting the development of technology that meets diverse user preferences and abilities, thereby ensuring greater accessibility and a more user-centric technological landscape.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21452,"journal":{"name":"Robotics and Computer-integrated Manufacturing","volume":"95 ","pages":"Article 103045"},"PeriodicalIF":9.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Robotics and Computer-integrated Manufacturing","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0736584525000997","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the Industry 5.0 context, ensuring effective Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) is key to supporting human involvement in production processes. Interfaces are the foundation of this collaboration and serve as vital communication channels which bridge the gap between users and robotic systems. This study compares unimodal and multimodal interfaces and their impact on user experience (UX) in an HRI context. Unimodal interfaces, while simplifying implementation, may restrict the richness of communication, while multimodal interfaces provide detailed and flexible interaction, enhancing the conveyance of complex information. However, designing effective multimodal interfaces presents challenges due to their inherent complexity in managing multiple modalities. This paper presents an HRI disassembly case study comparing the impact of these interfaces on the UX. A methodological approach was used to monitor operator performance, physiological responses, and perceptual responses. An electroencephalogram was employed to objectively record the operators’ emotional responses of operators without interrupting or hindering the process. Twenty participants (10 men and 10 women) were involved in the study. The results indicate that levels of memorization and mental workload are lower when using the multimodal interface, a finding consistent across men and women. These findings suggest that the multimodal interface is an appropriate choice, not only for reducing memorization and mental workload levels, but also for its inclusive approach. This aligns with the objectives of Industry 5.0, promoting the development of technology that meets diverse user preferences and abilities, thereby ensuring greater accessibility and a more user-centric technological landscape.
工业人机交互中的用户体验:用于拆卸任务的单模态和多模态界面的比较分析
在工业5.0环境中,确保有效的人机交互(HRI)是支持人类参与生产过程的关键。接口是这种协作的基础,是连接用户和机器人系统之间的重要沟通渠道。本研究比较了HRI环境下单模态和多模态界面及其对用户体验(UX)的影响。单模态接口虽然简化了实现,但可能限制了通信的丰富性,而多模态接口提供了详细而灵活的交互,增强了复杂信息的传递。然而,设计有效的多模态接口由于其在管理多模态时固有的复杂性而面临挑战。本文介绍了一个HRI拆卸案例研究,比较了这些接口对用户体验的影响。采用方法学方法监测操作人员的表现、生理反应和知觉反应。在不中断或阻碍操作过程的情况下,采用脑电图客观记录操作人员的情绪反应。20名参与者(10名男性和10名女性)参与了这项研究。结果表明,使用多模式界面时,记忆力和脑力负荷水平较低,这一发现在男性和女性中都是一致的。这些发现表明,多模式界面是一个合适的选择,不仅可以减少记忆和心理工作量水平,而且还具有包容性。这与工业5.0的目标一致,促进满足不同用户偏好和能力的技术开发,从而确保更大的可访问性和更以用户为中心的技术景观。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Robotics and Computer-integrated Manufacturing
Robotics and Computer-integrated Manufacturing 工程技术-工程:制造
CiteScore
24.10
自引率
13.50%
发文量
160
审稿时长
50 days
期刊介绍: The journal, Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, focuses on sharing research applications that contribute to the development of new or enhanced robotics, manufacturing technologies, and innovative manufacturing strategies that are relevant to industry. Papers that combine theory and experimental validation are preferred, while review papers on current robotics and manufacturing issues are also considered. However, papers on traditional machining processes, modeling and simulation, supply chain management, and resource optimization are generally not within the scope of the journal, as there are more appropriate journals for these topics. Similarly, papers that are overly theoretical or mathematical will be directed to other suitable journals. The journal welcomes original papers in areas such as industrial robotics, human-robot collaboration in manufacturing, cloud-based manufacturing, cyber-physical production systems, big data analytics in manufacturing, smart mechatronics, machine learning, adaptive and sustainable manufacturing, and other fields involving unique manufacturing technologies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信