EFL teachers’ formative assessment literacy and developmental Trajectories: A comparative study of face-to-face and blended teaching modes

IF 4.9 1区 文学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Yaru Meng , Yu Cui , Vahid Aryadoust
{"title":"EFL teachers’ formative assessment literacy and developmental Trajectories: A comparative study of face-to-face and blended teaching modes","authors":"Yaru Meng ,&nbsp;Yu Cui ,&nbsp;Vahid Aryadoust","doi":"10.1016/j.system.2025.103694","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The critical role of EFL teachers' formative assessment literacy (FAL) in face-to-face (F2F) teaching mode has been well acknowledged, and its significance has also been stressed in the blended teaching (BT) mode. However, very little is known about the comparison of FAL and developmental trajectories in the two modes. To address this gap, the current study first constructed a FAL scale and its development scale for both modes, with the latter informed by Activity Theory and the former as the ultimate outcome for the latter, linking the two scales into a unified system. A one-way multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) of the two samples' questionnaire responses revealed that the overall FAL, especially assessment practice, student involvement, and socio-emotion exhibit significant differences across the two modes. A multi-group path analysis of their developmental trajectories demonstrated that both groups' FAL was directly influenced by motivation and was also mediated by resources and community. However, the mediation effect of community from motivation to assessment practice and socio-emotion has significant differences across the two modes. The semi-structured interview confirmed the above findings. The study provides insights into the development of EFL teachers’ FAL in the technology-enriched environment, including genearative AI era.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48185,"journal":{"name":"System","volume":"132 ","pages":"Article 103694"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"System","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0346251X25001046","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The critical role of EFL teachers' formative assessment literacy (FAL) in face-to-face (F2F) teaching mode has been well acknowledged, and its significance has also been stressed in the blended teaching (BT) mode. However, very little is known about the comparison of FAL and developmental trajectories in the two modes. To address this gap, the current study first constructed a FAL scale and its development scale for both modes, with the latter informed by Activity Theory and the former as the ultimate outcome for the latter, linking the two scales into a unified system. A one-way multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) of the two samples' questionnaire responses revealed that the overall FAL, especially assessment practice, student involvement, and socio-emotion exhibit significant differences across the two modes. A multi-group path analysis of their developmental trajectories demonstrated that both groups' FAL was directly influenced by motivation and was also mediated by resources and community. However, the mediation effect of community from motivation to assessment practice and socio-emotion has significant differences across the two modes. The semi-structured interview confirmed the above findings. The study provides insights into the development of EFL teachers’ FAL in the technology-enriched environment, including genearative AI era.
英语教师形成性评价、素养与发展轨迹:面授与混合式教学模式的比较研究
英语教师形成性评价素养(FAL)在面对面(F2F)教学模式中的关键作用已得到公认,其重要性在混合式教学模式中也得到强调。然而,对于两种模式下FAL和发育轨迹的比较了解甚少。为了解决这一差距,本研究首先构建了两种模式的FAL量表及其发展量表,后者以活动理论为依据,前者作为后者的最终结果,将两个量表连接成一个统一的系统。单因素方差分析(MANOVA)显示,两种模式的学生总体学习能力,特别是评估实践、学生投入和社会情绪表现出显著差异。多群体路径分析表明,两种群体的FAL均受到动机的直接影响,同时也受到资源和社区的中介作用。然而,社区从动机到评估实践和社会情绪的中介作用在两种模式之间存在显著差异。半结构化访谈证实了上述发现。该研究为在技术丰富的环境下,包括生成式人工智能时代,英语教师的外语学习能力的发展提供了见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
System
System Multiple-
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
8.30%
发文量
202
审稿时长
64 days
期刊介绍: This international journal is devoted to the applications of educational technology and applied linguistics to problems of foreign language teaching and learning. Attention is paid to all languages and to problems associated with the study and teaching of English as a second or foreign language. The journal serves as a vehicle of expression for colleagues in developing countries. System prefers its contributors to provide articles which have a sound theoretical base with a visible practical application which can be generalized. The review section may take up works of a more theoretical nature to broaden the background.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信