{"title":"EFL teachers’ formative assessment literacy and developmental Trajectories: A comparative study of face-to-face and blended teaching modes","authors":"Yaru Meng , Yu Cui , Vahid Aryadoust","doi":"10.1016/j.system.2025.103694","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The critical role of EFL teachers' formative assessment literacy (FAL) in face-to-face (F2F) teaching mode has been well acknowledged, and its significance has also been stressed in the blended teaching (BT) mode. However, very little is known about the comparison of FAL and developmental trajectories in the two modes. To address this gap, the current study first constructed a FAL scale and its development scale for both modes, with the latter informed by Activity Theory and the former as the ultimate outcome for the latter, linking the two scales into a unified system. A one-way multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) of the two samples' questionnaire responses revealed that the overall FAL, especially assessment practice, student involvement, and socio-emotion exhibit significant differences across the two modes. A multi-group path analysis of their developmental trajectories demonstrated that both groups' FAL was directly influenced by motivation and was also mediated by resources and community. However, the mediation effect of community from motivation to assessment practice and socio-emotion has significant differences across the two modes. The semi-structured interview confirmed the above findings. The study provides insights into the development of EFL teachers’ FAL in the technology-enriched environment, including genearative AI era.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48185,"journal":{"name":"System","volume":"132 ","pages":"Article 103694"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"System","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0346251X25001046","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The critical role of EFL teachers' formative assessment literacy (FAL) in face-to-face (F2F) teaching mode has been well acknowledged, and its significance has also been stressed in the blended teaching (BT) mode. However, very little is known about the comparison of FAL and developmental trajectories in the two modes. To address this gap, the current study first constructed a FAL scale and its development scale for both modes, with the latter informed by Activity Theory and the former as the ultimate outcome for the latter, linking the two scales into a unified system. A one-way multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) of the two samples' questionnaire responses revealed that the overall FAL, especially assessment practice, student involvement, and socio-emotion exhibit significant differences across the two modes. A multi-group path analysis of their developmental trajectories demonstrated that both groups' FAL was directly influenced by motivation and was also mediated by resources and community. However, the mediation effect of community from motivation to assessment practice and socio-emotion has significant differences across the two modes. The semi-structured interview confirmed the above findings. The study provides insights into the development of EFL teachers’ FAL in the technology-enriched environment, including genearative AI era.
期刊介绍:
This international journal is devoted to the applications of educational technology and applied linguistics to problems of foreign language teaching and learning. Attention is paid to all languages and to problems associated with the study and teaching of English as a second or foreign language. The journal serves as a vehicle of expression for colleagues in developing countries. System prefers its contributors to provide articles which have a sound theoretical base with a visible practical application which can be generalized. The review section may take up works of a more theoretical nature to broaden the background.