Dong-Dong Li, Lang Liang, Hu-Die He, Tian-Ci Yi, Dao-Chao Jin
{"title":"Phylogenomics offers new insights into the classification of Phytoseiidae (Acari: Mesostigmata)","authors":"Dong-Dong Li, Lang Liang, Hu-Die He, Tian-Ci Yi, Dao-Chao Jin","doi":"10.1016/j.ympev.2025.108348","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Phytoseiid mites are significant natural predators of harmful mites and constitute one of the largest groups within Gamasina (Acari: Mesostigmata). The currently accepted classification divides the Phytoseiidae family into three subfamilies, primarily based on the pattern of their dorsal setae. However, the phylogenetic relationships among these subfamilies remain unresolved. To address this issue, we sampled forty representative species from the three subfamilies. Using a specific Arachnida reference dataset (orthodb10, n = 2,934), we mined thousands of universal single-copy orthologs from whole-genome sequencing data. We then constructed four amino-acid matrices, taking into account evolutionary rates and the degree of violation of the molecular clock (DVMC). Phylogenetic trees were reconstructed using both concatenated and multispecies coalescent (MSC) analyses. Based on maximum likelihood and Bayesian inference, the majority of the phylogenetic trees supported the hypothesis (P2) of Phytoseiinae + (Typhlodrominae + (<em>Galendromus</em> + Amblyseiinae)). However, when using slowly evolving and non-clock-like genes, the MSC trees supported an alternative hypothesis (P1) of Typhlodrominae + (Phytoseiinae + (<em>Galendromus</em> + Amblyseiinae)). Additional analyses, including model fitness, topology tests, and morphological comparisons, favored the hypothesis P2. Our findings indicate that Typhlodrominae is not monophyletic, and <em>Galendromus</em> and Amblyseiinae are sister groups. Based on these results, we recommend that <em>Galendromus</em> be separated from Typhlodrominae and elevated to a fourth subfamily.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56109,"journal":{"name":"Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution","volume":"209 ","pages":"Article 108348"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S105579032500065X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Phytoseiid mites are significant natural predators of harmful mites and constitute one of the largest groups within Gamasina (Acari: Mesostigmata). The currently accepted classification divides the Phytoseiidae family into three subfamilies, primarily based on the pattern of their dorsal setae. However, the phylogenetic relationships among these subfamilies remain unresolved. To address this issue, we sampled forty representative species from the three subfamilies. Using a specific Arachnida reference dataset (orthodb10, n = 2,934), we mined thousands of universal single-copy orthologs from whole-genome sequencing data. We then constructed four amino-acid matrices, taking into account evolutionary rates and the degree of violation of the molecular clock (DVMC). Phylogenetic trees were reconstructed using both concatenated and multispecies coalescent (MSC) analyses. Based on maximum likelihood and Bayesian inference, the majority of the phylogenetic trees supported the hypothesis (P2) of Phytoseiinae + (Typhlodrominae + (Galendromus + Amblyseiinae)). However, when using slowly evolving and non-clock-like genes, the MSC trees supported an alternative hypothesis (P1) of Typhlodrominae + (Phytoseiinae + (Galendromus + Amblyseiinae)). Additional analyses, including model fitness, topology tests, and morphological comparisons, favored the hypothesis P2. Our findings indicate that Typhlodrominae is not monophyletic, and Galendromus and Amblyseiinae are sister groups. Based on these results, we recommend that Galendromus be separated from Typhlodrominae and elevated to a fourth subfamily.
期刊介绍:
Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution is dedicated to bringing Darwin''s dream within grasp - to "have fairly true genealogical trees of each great kingdom of Nature." The journal provides a forum for molecular studies that advance our understanding of phylogeny and evolution, further the development of phylogenetically more accurate taxonomic classifications, and ultimately bring a unified classification for all the ramifying lines of life. Phylogeographic studies will be considered for publication if they offer EXCEPTIONAL theoretical or empirical advances.