Interrupted pledgeted proximal anastomosis for open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair

IF 0.7 Q4 SURGERY
Juan P. Cobar MD, MBA , Jeremy Fridling MD , Colin Cleary PhD , Edward Gifford MD , Ya-Huei Li PhD , Stephen Thompson PhD , Amir Ebadinejad MD , Elizabeth Aitcheson MD , Parth S. Shah MD , James Gallagher MD , Akhilesh Jain MD , Thomas Divinagracia MD , Owen Glotzer MD
{"title":"Interrupted pledgeted proximal anastomosis for open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair","authors":"Juan P. Cobar MD, MBA ,&nbsp;Jeremy Fridling MD ,&nbsp;Colin Cleary PhD ,&nbsp;Edward Gifford MD ,&nbsp;Ya-Huei Li PhD ,&nbsp;Stephen Thompson PhD ,&nbsp;Amir Ebadinejad MD ,&nbsp;Elizabeth Aitcheson MD ,&nbsp;Parth S. Shah MD ,&nbsp;James Gallagher MD ,&nbsp;Akhilesh Jain MD ,&nbsp;Thomas Divinagracia MD ,&nbsp;Owen Glotzer MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jvscit.2025.101789","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The proximal anastomosis is a crucial step during open repair of an abdominal aortic aneurysm. A technically sound anastomosis decreases intraoperative blood loss, as well as the operative time needed for suture line repair. Traditionally, a continuous running suture is used for the construction of this anastomosis. At the author's institution, the technique of an interrupted pledgeted proximal anastomosis is selectively used when the quality of the aortic tissue is suboptimal. This report describes the technique of the interrupted pledgeted proximal aortic anastomosis and compares outcomes to the traditional continuous technique. Among 60 pledgeted and 48 continuous anastomoses, we found equivalent clamp time, operative time, and intraoperative estimated blood loss for the two techniques. However, patients with a continuous anastomosis had higher risks of additional reinforcement during hospitalization (43.3% pledgeted vs 72.9% continuous; P = .002). The interrupted anastomotic technique presented here is a valuable option in open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair when faced with friable aortic tissue.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":45071,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vascular Surgery Cases Innovations and Techniques","volume":"11 4","pages":"Article 101789"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Vascular Surgery Cases Innovations and Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468428725000711","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The proximal anastomosis is a crucial step during open repair of an abdominal aortic aneurysm. A technically sound anastomosis decreases intraoperative blood loss, as well as the operative time needed for suture line repair. Traditionally, a continuous running suture is used for the construction of this anastomosis. At the author's institution, the technique of an interrupted pledgeted proximal anastomosis is selectively used when the quality of the aortic tissue is suboptimal. This report describes the technique of the interrupted pledgeted proximal aortic anastomosis and compares outcomes to the traditional continuous technique. Among 60 pledgeted and 48 continuous anastomoses, we found equivalent clamp time, operative time, and intraoperative estimated blood loss for the two techniques. However, patients with a continuous anastomosis had higher risks of additional reinforcement during hospitalization (43.3% pledgeted vs 72.9% continuous; P = .002). The interrupted anastomotic technique presented here is a valuable option in open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair when faced with friable aortic tissue.
断质近端吻合术治疗腹主动脉瘤开放性
近端吻合是腹主动脉瘤开放性修复的关键步骤。技术上合理的吻合可以减少术中出血量,也可以减少缝合线修复所需的手术时间。传统上,连续运行的缝线用于这种吻合的建设。在作者的机构中,当主动脉组织质量不理想时,选择性地使用断续质近端吻合技术。本报告描述了中断质状主动脉近端吻合术的技术,并与传统的连续技术的结果进行了比较。在60例固定吻合和48例连续吻合中,我们发现两种技术的钳夹时间、手术时间和术中估计出血量相等。然而,连续吻合的患者在住院期间有更高的额外加固风险(43.3%承诺vs 72.9%连续;P = .002)。当面对脆弱的主动脉组织时,此处提出的间断吻合技术是一种有价值的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
14.30%
发文量
219
审稿时长
29 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Vascular Surgery Cases and Innovative Techniques is a surgical journal dedicated to publishing peer review high quality case reports, vascular images and innovative techniques related to all aspects of arterial, venous, and lymphatic diseases and disorders, including vascular trauma, malformations, wound care and the placement and maintenance of arterio-venous dialysis accesses with an emphasis on the practicing clinician. The Journal seeks to provide novel and timely information to vascular surgeons, interventionalists, phlebologists, wound care specialists, and allied health professionals involved with the management of patients with the entire spectrum of vascular disorders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信