Belantamab Mafodotin Monotherapy for Multiply-Relapsed Myeloma: A Retrospective Study From the United Kingdom and the Republic of Ireland

EJHaem Pub Date : 2025-04-30 DOI:10.1002/jha2.70039
Edmund C. R. Watson, Faouzi Djebbari, Fotios Panitsas, Grant Vallance, Samir Asher, Malahat Saeed, Mairi Walker, Matthew Powell, Alexandros Rampotas, Heather Leary, Akhil Khera, Angharad Atkinson, Ni Ni Aung, Gillian Brearton, Joseph Froggatt, Ezzat El Hassadi, Ellen Gokkel, Sarah Lawless, Beena Salhan, Salim Shafeek, Anand Lokare, Carol Stirling, Udo Oppermann, Richard Soutar, Rakesh Popat, Charalampia Kyriakou, Karthik Ramasamy
{"title":"Belantamab Mafodotin Monotherapy for Multiply-Relapsed Myeloma: A Retrospective Study From the United Kingdom and the Republic of Ireland","authors":"Edmund C. R. Watson,&nbsp;Faouzi Djebbari,&nbsp;Fotios Panitsas,&nbsp;Grant Vallance,&nbsp;Samir Asher,&nbsp;Malahat Saeed,&nbsp;Mairi Walker,&nbsp;Matthew Powell,&nbsp;Alexandros Rampotas,&nbsp;Heather Leary,&nbsp;Akhil Khera,&nbsp;Angharad Atkinson,&nbsp;Ni Ni Aung,&nbsp;Gillian Brearton,&nbsp;Joseph Froggatt,&nbsp;Ezzat El Hassadi,&nbsp;Ellen Gokkel,&nbsp;Sarah Lawless,&nbsp;Beena Salhan,&nbsp;Salim Shafeek,&nbsp;Anand Lokare,&nbsp;Carol Stirling,&nbsp;Udo Oppermann,&nbsp;Richard Soutar,&nbsp;Rakesh Popat,&nbsp;Charalampia Kyriakou,&nbsp;Karthik Ramasamy","doi":"10.1002/jha2.70039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Belantamab mafodotin (belamaf) was the first BCMA-targeting immunotherapy licensed in myeloma and was available as monotherapy for a fifth or greater line of treatment. Outcomes for patients in the United Kingdom and the Republic of Ireland potentially differ from those of other regions and may illuminate factors predicting response to therapy.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods and Results</h3>\n \n <p>We performed a retrospective study of patients treated with belamaf monotherapy in the United Kingdom and the Republic of Ireland. In our cohort of 88 patients, we saw an overall response rate (ORR) of 60%, a median progression-free survival (PFS) of 8.7 months and a median duration of response (DoR) of 15.8 months. The spectrum of adverse events was as expected, with 84% (71/85) of patients experiencing toxicity. Eye-related adverse events were the most common, affecting 66% (56/85), leading to dose reduction or delay in 41% (35/85) and discontinuation in 6% (5/85). We specifically assessed physician decision-making in the context of ocular side effects and found a relatively high frequency of the drug being administered despite moderate levels of toxicity.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Our cohort's ORR is significantly different from those of the DREAMM-2 and -3 trials and other real-world studies, though a long-duration response has been reported in other cohorts. Comparative analysis with other real-world studies did not reveal any significant factors predictive of ORR. The frequent administration of belamaf to patients with eye disease may well reflect a more pragmatic approach than was originally prescribed in the landmark trials.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Trial Registration</h3>\n \n <p>The authors have confirmed clinical trial registration is not needed for this submission.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":72883,"journal":{"name":"EJHaem","volume":"6 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jha2.70039","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EJHaem","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jha2.70039","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Belantamab mafodotin (belamaf) was the first BCMA-targeting immunotherapy licensed in myeloma and was available as monotherapy for a fifth or greater line of treatment. Outcomes for patients in the United Kingdom and the Republic of Ireland potentially differ from those of other regions and may illuminate factors predicting response to therapy.

Methods and Results

We performed a retrospective study of patients treated with belamaf monotherapy in the United Kingdom and the Republic of Ireland. In our cohort of 88 patients, we saw an overall response rate (ORR) of 60%, a median progression-free survival (PFS) of 8.7 months and a median duration of response (DoR) of 15.8 months. The spectrum of adverse events was as expected, with 84% (71/85) of patients experiencing toxicity. Eye-related adverse events were the most common, affecting 66% (56/85), leading to dose reduction or delay in 41% (35/85) and discontinuation in 6% (5/85). We specifically assessed physician decision-making in the context of ocular side effects and found a relatively high frequency of the drug being administered despite moderate levels of toxicity.

Conclusion

Our cohort's ORR is significantly different from those of the DREAMM-2 and -3 trials and other real-world studies, though a long-duration response has been reported in other cohorts. Comparative analysis with other real-world studies did not reveal any significant factors predictive of ORR. The frequent administration of belamaf to patients with eye disease may well reflect a more pragmatic approach than was originally prescribed in the landmark trials.

Trial Registration

The authors have confirmed clinical trial registration is not needed for this submission.

Abstract Image

Belantamab Mafodotin单药治疗多发性复发骨髓瘤:来自英国和爱尔兰共和国的回顾性研究
Belantamab mafodotin (belamaf)是首个获批用于骨髓瘤的bcma靶向免疫疗法,可作为第五线或更多治疗的单一疗法。英国和爱尔兰共和国患者的预后可能与其他地区不同,并可能阐明预测治疗反应的因素。方法和结果我们对英国和爱尔兰共和国接受贝拉马单药治疗的患者进行了回顾性研究。在我们的88例患者队列中,我们看到总缓解率(ORR)为60%,中位无进展生存期(PFS)为8.7个月,中位反应持续时间(DoR)为15.8个月。不良事件的范围与预期一致,84%(71/85)的患者出现毒性反应。眼部相关不良事件最为常见,影响66%(56/85),41%(35/85)导致剂量减少或延迟,6%(5/85)导致停药。我们特别评估了眼科副作用背景下的医生决策,发现尽管毒性水平中等,但使用该药物的频率相对较高。结论:尽管在其他队列中也报道了长时间的反应,但我们队列的ORR与dream -2和dream -3试验以及其他现实世界研究的ORR有显著不同。与其他现实研究的比较分析未发现任何预测ORR的显著因素。对眼病患者频繁使用belamaf可能很好地反映了一种比最初在具有里程碑意义的试验中规定的更务实的方法。试验注册作者已确认该提交不需要临床试验注册。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信