Patient understanding of fetal sex versus gender in the context of routine cell-free DNA screening

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Mindy Kolodziejski, Natalie Stoner, Kathryn Leal, Samantha Montgomery, Ted Tabor, Alvaro Montealegre, Shannon Mulligan
{"title":"Patient understanding of fetal sex versus gender in the context of routine cell-free DNA screening","authors":"Mindy Kolodziejski,&nbsp;Natalie Stoner,&nbsp;Kathryn Leal,&nbsp;Samantha Montgomery,&nbsp;Ted Tabor,&nbsp;Alvaro Montealegre,&nbsp;Shannon Mulligan","doi":"10.1002/jgc4.70018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) is the current standard of care to screen for fetal aneuploidy using cell-free DNA. NIPT screens for sex chromosome aneuploidies and, in doing so, can predict fetal chromosomal sex. Despite sex and gender being distinct concepts, many patients refer to NIPT as the “gender test” and use NIPT to find out predicted fetal sex and assume gender. Our study aimed to evaluate and describe patient understanding of sex and gender in the context of receiving routine prenatal genetics education (PGE) on NIPT. A survey was developed in REDCap with the goal of assessing patient understanding of sex versus gender and factors that may influence their understanding. University of Texas Physicians patients in the Greater Houston area who received PGE were prospectively recruited from August to December 2023 (<i>N</i> = 375) to participate in this study. Statistical analysis found that, despite a majority (92.0%) of participants receiving PGE that was known to use “sex” exclusively in its written terminology, over half (51.0%) reported that their PGE used “gender.” Participants were more likely to report that their PGE used “gender” if they also reported using “gender” to reference their own pregnancy (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). While a majority (76.0%) of participants correctly answered less than 50% of questions aimed to assess understanding of gender, those who were younger (<i>p</i> = 0.001) and those with a higher level of education (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) answered more questions correctly. Younger and more educated participants were also more likely to report that they correctly use “sex” to reference their pregnancy as opposed to “gender” (<i>p</i> = 0.018 and <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001, respectively). Ultimately, this study identified that there is a gap in patient understanding of sex versus gender that could potentially be mediated by improved prenatal genetics education.</p>","PeriodicalId":54829,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Genetic Counseling","volume":"34 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jgc4.70018","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Genetic Counseling","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jgc4.70018","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) is the current standard of care to screen for fetal aneuploidy using cell-free DNA. NIPT screens for sex chromosome aneuploidies and, in doing so, can predict fetal chromosomal sex. Despite sex and gender being distinct concepts, many patients refer to NIPT as the “gender test” and use NIPT to find out predicted fetal sex and assume gender. Our study aimed to evaluate and describe patient understanding of sex and gender in the context of receiving routine prenatal genetics education (PGE) on NIPT. A survey was developed in REDCap with the goal of assessing patient understanding of sex versus gender and factors that may influence their understanding. University of Texas Physicians patients in the Greater Houston area who received PGE were prospectively recruited from August to December 2023 (N = 375) to participate in this study. Statistical analysis found that, despite a majority (92.0%) of participants receiving PGE that was known to use “sex” exclusively in its written terminology, over half (51.0%) reported that their PGE used “gender.” Participants were more likely to report that their PGE used “gender” if they also reported using “gender” to reference their own pregnancy (p < 0.001). While a majority (76.0%) of participants correctly answered less than 50% of questions aimed to assess understanding of gender, those who were younger (p = 0.001) and those with a higher level of education (p < 0.001) answered more questions correctly. Younger and more educated participants were also more likely to report that they correctly use “sex” to reference their pregnancy as opposed to “gender” (p = 0.018 and p < 0.001, respectively). Ultimately, this study identified that there is a gap in patient understanding of sex versus gender that could potentially be mediated by improved prenatal genetics education.

Abstract Image

在常规无细胞DNA筛查的背景下,患者对胎儿性别的理解
无创产前检测(NIPT)是目前使用无细胞DNA筛查胎儿非整倍体的标准护理方法。NIPT筛查性染色体非整倍体,这样做可以预测胎儿染色体性别。尽管性别和社会性别是截然不同的概念,但许多患者将NIPT称为“性别测试”,并使用NIPT来预测胎儿性别并假设性别。本研究旨在评估和描述患者在接受NIPT常规产前遗传学教育(PGE)的背景下对性别和社会性别的理解。REDCap开展了一项调查,目的是评估患者对性别与性别的理解以及可能影响他们理解的因素。于2023年8月至12月前瞻性招募大休斯顿地区接受PGE治疗的德克萨斯大学内科医生患者(N = 375)参加本研究。统计分析发现,尽管大多数(92.0%)接受PGE的参与者在书面术语中只使用“性别”,但超过一半(51.0%)的参与者报告他们的PGE使用“性别”。如果参与者也报告使用“性别”来指代自己的怀孕,那么他们更有可能报告他们的PGE使用“性别”(p < 0.001)。虽然大多数(76.0%)的参与者正确回答了不到50%的旨在评估对性别理解的问题,但那些更年轻(p = 0.001)和受教育程度更高(p < 0.001)的人回答了更多的问题。年轻和受教育程度更高的参与者也更有可能报告说,他们正确地使用“性”来指代自己的怀孕,而不是“性别”(p = 0.018和p <; 0.001)。最终,本研究发现,患者对性别和性别的理解存在差距,这可能通过改善产前遗传学教育来调解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Genetic Counseling
Journal of Genetic Counseling GENETICS & HEREDITY-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
26.30%
发文量
113
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Genetic Counseling (JOGC), published for the National Society of Genetic Counselors, is a timely, international forum addressing all aspects of the discipline and practice of genetic counseling. The journal focuses on the critical questions and problems that arise at the interface between rapidly advancing technological developments and the concerns of individuals and communities at genetic risk. The publication provides genetic counselors, other clinicians and health educators, laboratory geneticists, bioethicists, legal scholars, social scientists, and other researchers with a premier resource on genetic counseling topics in national, international, and cross-national contexts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信