Yujia Zhao , Ming Lai , Yuqi Wu , Guangyao Li , Hao Jiang , Junjia Cui
{"title":"Fatigue life prediction of aluminum-steel magnetic pulse crimped joints based on point cloud measurement and gradient boosting regression trees","authors":"Yujia Zhao , Ming Lai , Yuqi Wu , Guangyao Li , Hao Jiang , Junjia Cui","doi":"10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2025.109020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The fatigue life of magnetic pulse crimping (MPC) joints is crucial for the safe fatigue design of connection structures. Traditional fatigue life prediction methods primarily rely on loading condition analysis and fail to fully account for the impact of manufacturing variations (such as raw material dimensions, process parameters, and joint deformations), which presents challenges for accurate fatigue life prediction. To address this issue, this paper proposes a fatigue life prediction method for MPC joints that combines point cloud measurement and machine learning (ML) models. Random sample consensus (RANSAC) and point cloud segmentation are used to extract the joint deformation contour precisely. Compared to metallographic analysis, this method achieved non-destructive extraction of joint deformation features. Based on this, an integrated dataset covering the entire process from raw materials to fatigue testing is established. Five machine learning models are trained and tested, with results showing that the gradient boosting regression trees (GBRT) model performs the best. The visualization of a single decision tree in the GBRT model is analyzed, providing a transparent decision-making process. A comparison is made between the GBRT model and the traditional Basquin model. In the GBRT model, 100% of the training set and 90% of the testing set fall within the 1.5 times error band, while only 45% of the training set and 60% of the testing set in the Basquin model fall within this range. Additionally, the GBRT model achieves a higher coefficient of determination (<em>R</em><sup>2</sup>) on the dataset compared to the Basquin model.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":14112,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Fatigue","volume":"198 ","pages":"Article 109020"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Fatigue","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0142112325002178","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The fatigue life of magnetic pulse crimping (MPC) joints is crucial for the safe fatigue design of connection structures. Traditional fatigue life prediction methods primarily rely on loading condition analysis and fail to fully account for the impact of manufacturing variations (such as raw material dimensions, process parameters, and joint deformations), which presents challenges for accurate fatigue life prediction. To address this issue, this paper proposes a fatigue life prediction method for MPC joints that combines point cloud measurement and machine learning (ML) models. Random sample consensus (RANSAC) and point cloud segmentation are used to extract the joint deformation contour precisely. Compared to metallographic analysis, this method achieved non-destructive extraction of joint deformation features. Based on this, an integrated dataset covering the entire process from raw materials to fatigue testing is established. Five machine learning models are trained and tested, with results showing that the gradient boosting regression trees (GBRT) model performs the best. The visualization of a single decision tree in the GBRT model is analyzed, providing a transparent decision-making process. A comparison is made between the GBRT model and the traditional Basquin model. In the GBRT model, 100% of the training set and 90% of the testing set fall within the 1.5 times error band, while only 45% of the training set and 60% of the testing set in the Basquin model fall within this range. Additionally, the GBRT model achieves a higher coefficient of determination (R2) on the dataset compared to the Basquin model.
期刊介绍:
Typical subjects discussed in International Journal of Fatigue address:
Novel fatigue testing and characterization methods (new kinds of fatigue tests, critical evaluation of existing methods, in situ measurement of fatigue degradation, non-contact field measurements)
Multiaxial fatigue and complex loading effects of materials and structures, exploring state-of-the-art concepts in degradation under cyclic loading
Fatigue in the very high cycle regime, including failure mode transitions from surface to subsurface, effects of surface treatment, processing, and loading conditions
Modeling (including degradation processes and related driving forces, multiscale/multi-resolution methods, computational hierarchical and concurrent methods for coupled component and material responses, novel methods for notch root analysis, fracture mechanics, damage mechanics, crack growth kinetics, life prediction and durability, and prediction of stochastic fatigue behavior reflecting microstructure and service conditions)
Models for early stages of fatigue crack formation and growth that explicitly consider microstructure and relevant materials science aspects
Understanding the influence or manufacturing and processing route on fatigue degradation, and embedding this understanding in more predictive schemes for mitigation and design against fatigue
Prognosis and damage state awareness (including sensors, monitoring, methodology, interactive control, accelerated methods, data interpretation)
Applications of technologies associated with fatigue and their implications for structural integrity and reliability. This includes issues related to design, operation and maintenance, i.e., life cycle engineering
Smart materials and structures that can sense and mitigate fatigue degradation
Fatigue of devices and structures at small scales, including effects of process route and surfaces/interfaces.