Lieux du rêve

E. Serin
{"title":"Lieux du rêve","authors":"E. Serin","doi":"10.1016/j.inan.2025.100516","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Context</h3><div>This article traces the origins of research into the COVID-19 pandemic. In 2020, at the dawn of the first confinement, historian Hervé Mazurel and psychoanalyst Elizabeth Serin launched a dream collection. The aim of this collection is to grasp something of the articulation between psychic life and the historical social, and to identify the extent to which they are intertwined. It's an open-ended study, empirically constructed, that attempts to make dream narratives speak outside the realm of the cure, in order to interrogate what is inscribed in them about a collective experience – in this case, a global pandemic.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>Postulating that the Freudian unconscious is not just another scene cut off from social reality, we hope to test the historicization of the unconscious and the porosity of psychic dimensions to the social and political present.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>Our research method is empirical. Starting with the identification of imaginaries and their motifs, and the way they are repeated and hybridized in dream narratives, we explore with our theoretical and clinical references what these manifest contents refer to, thus proposing an exploration that aims to air psychoanalytical concepts in their friction with the fields of the social sciences, handling them from new points of view that produce a decentering.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>This exploration leads us to reopen the question of dream interpretation, which, though turned towards childhood experiences, fantasies and the subject's unconscious desires, are nonetheless spaces for dialogue with the present. Experienced during this period in these dream narratives as concentrationary, and with the Second World War as its reference catastrophe, this present questions the future of our societies, particularly in the light of climate change, which in its own way opens up the field of possibilities.</div></div><div><h3>Interpretations</h3><div>While Freud conceives of the dream and its narrative as a utopia, we consider it to be heterotopic in the multiplicity of polarities it deploys. This research revisits the dialogue between Freud and Ferenczi on the status of fantasy and reality, and questions the links between hallucination, representation and perception. By displacing the ego's oppositional relationship to external reality as the rock of castration, it questions the interweaving of spaces ranging from the psychic to the social and political.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100661,"journal":{"name":"In Analysis","volume":"9 1","pages":"Article 100516"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"In Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S254236062500023X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context

This article traces the origins of research into the COVID-19 pandemic. In 2020, at the dawn of the first confinement, historian Hervé Mazurel and psychoanalyst Elizabeth Serin launched a dream collection. The aim of this collection is to grasp something of the articulation between psychic life and the historical social, and to identify the extent to which they are intertwined. It's an open-ended study, empirically constructed, that attempts to make dream narratives speak outside the realm of the cure, in order to interrogate what is inscribed in them about a collective experience – in this case, a global pandemic.

Objectives

Postulating that the Freudian unconscious is not just another scene cut off from social reality, we hope to test the historicization of the unconscious and the porosity of psychic dimensions to the social and political present.

Method

Our research method is empirical. Starting with the identification of imaginaries and their motifs, and the way they are repeated and hybridized in dream narratives, we explore with our theoretical and clinical references what these manifest contents refer to, thus proposing an exploration that aims to air psychoanalytical concepts in their friction with the fields of the social sciences, handling them from new points of view that produce a decentering.

Results

This exploration leads us to reopen the question of dream interpretation, which, though turned towards childhood experiences, fantasies and the subject's unconscious desires, are nonetheless spaces for dialogue with the present. Experienced during this period in these dream narratives as concentrationary, and with the Second World War as its reference catastrophe, this present questions the future of our societies, particularly in the light of climate change, which in its own way opens up the field of possibilities.

Interpretations

While Freud conceives of the dream and its narrative as a utopia, we consider it to be heterotopic in the multiplicity of polarities it deploys. This research revisits the dialogue between Freud and Ferenczi on the status of fantasy and reality, and questions the links between hallucination, representation and perception. By displacing the ego's oppositional relationship to external reality as the rock of castration, it questions the interweaving of spaces ranging from the psychic to the social and political.
梦想之地
本文追溯了COVID-19大流行研究的起源。2020年,在第一次分娩的黎明,历史学家herv Mazurel和精神分析学家Elizabeth Serin推出了一个梦想系列。这本作品集的目的是把握精神生活和历史社会之间的联系,并确定它们交织在一起的程度。这是一个开放式的研究,以经验为基础,试图让梦的叙述在治疗领域之外说话,以质问它们关于集体经历的内容——在这个例子中,是一场全球流行病。假设弗洛伊德的无意识不仅仅是与社会现实隔绝的另一个场景,我们希望测试无意识的历史化以及心理维度对社会和政治现状的多孔性。方法采用实证研究方法。从对想象及其母题的识别开始,以及它们在梦境叙述中重复和混杂的方式,我们用理论和临床的参考来探索这些明显的内容所指的是什么,从而提出一种探索,旨在揭示精神分析概念与社会科学领域的摩擦,从产生去中心化的新观点来处理它们。这一探索使我们重新审视梦的解释问题,尽管梦的解释转向童年经历、幻想和主体的无意识欲望,但它仍然是与现在对话的空间。在这段时间里,这些梦的叙述集中在一起,以第二次世界大战为参考灾难,这是对我们社会未来的质疑,特别是在气候变化的背景下,气候变化以其自己的方式开辟了可能性的领域。当弗洛伊德把梦和它的叙述想象成一个乌托邦时,我们认为它是异位的,因为它具有多重的极性。本研究回顾了弗洛伊德和费伦齐关于幻想和现实地位的对话,并对幻觉、表象和感知之间的联系提出了质疑。通过将自我与外部现实的对立关系作为阉割的岩石,它质疑从精神到社会和政治的空间交织。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信