Rayan Alabsi BS, MS , Tejasvi Subramanya BS, MS , Michael G. Livesey MD , Logan C. Kolakowski MD , Subham Badhyal PhD , Kevin Aroom MS, PE , Li-Qun Zhang PhD , Martha O. Wang PhD , Mohit N. Gilotra MD, MS
{"title":"A dual-cup reverse shoulder replacement improves impingement-free motion","authors":"Rayan Alabsi BS, MS , Tejasvi Subramanya BS, MS , Michael G. Livesey MD , Logan C. Kolakowski MD , Subham Badhyal PhD , Kevin Aroom MS, PE , Li-Qun Zhang PhD , Martha O. Wang PhD , Mohit N. Gilotra MD, MS","doi":"10.1053/j.sart.2024.12.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Advances in reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) design have improved functional outcomes, which approach those of the anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty in certain patients. However, restoration of motion, especially functional internal rotation (IR), remains a concern following RSA. A novel dual-cup RSA design was developed to improve impingement-free range of motion. The passive motion of the dual-cup RSA is compared to that of a commercially available RSA design in a cadaveric model.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Five fresh-frozen cadaveric upper-extremity specimens were included in the study. The scapula was rigidly fixed, allowing for isolation of glenohumeral joint motion. The novel dual-cup RSA design was tested with and without a flanged component. The dual-cup has an outer diameter of 36 mm, articulates with a 32 + 4 mm glenosphere, and provides 6 mm of glenoid lateralization. A 32 + 4 mm lateralized glenosphere and a 36 + 6 mm lateralized glenosphere served as controls. Measurements of motion were performed using an electromagnetic tracking device and modes of impingement were recorded. An analysis of variance test was performed with a post-hoc Tukey test to compare the relative changes in range of motion among groups.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The dual-cup <em>(without flange)</em> design improved external rotation at 0° abduction by 20.9° and improved IR by 11.5° compared to the 32 + 4 mm control (<em>P</em> < .01). In 90° abduction, the dual-cup improved external rotation by 11.9° compared to the 32 + 4 mm control, a significant improvement relative to the 36 + 6 mm control (<em>P</em> < .05). The dual-cup improved functional IR by 12.4° relative to the 32 + 4 mm control, a significant improvement relative to the 36 + 6 mm control (<em>P</em> < .05). The dual-cup did not significantly improve IR at 45° or 90° abduction compared to control models. Humeral component impingement on the glenoid was not observed at any end-range of motion in the implant with the flanged design.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>The dual-cup design improves all rotational motions relative to control models except IR with an abduction angle reaching or exceeding 45°. The dual-cup design improves impingement free motion, including functional IR, without additional lateralization in this study. The dual-dup with flange design eliminates impingement of the humeral cup on the glenoid neck without significantly affecting most motions relative to control models.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":39885,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in Arthroplasty","volume":"35 2","pages":"Pages 188-194"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in Arthroplasty","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1045452725000045","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Advances in reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) design have improved functional outcomes, which approach those of the anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty in certain patients. However, restoration of motion, especially functional internal rotation (IR), remains a concern following RSA. A novel dual-cup RSA design was developed to improve impingement-free range of motion. The passive motion of the dual-cup RSA is compared to that of a commercially available RSA design in a cadaveric model.
Methods
Five fresh-frozen cadaveric upper-extremity specimens were included in the study. The scapula was rigidly fixed, allowing for isolation of glenohumeral joint motion. The novel dual-cup RSA design was tested with and without a flanged component. The dual-cup has an outer diameter of 36 mm, articulates with a 32 + 4 mm glenosphere, and provides 6 mm of glenoid lateralization. A 32 + 4 mm lateralized glenosphere and a 36 + 6 mm lateralized glenosphere served as controls. Measurements of motion were performed using an electromagnetic tracking device and modes of impingement were recorded. An analysis of variance test was performed with a post-hoc Tukey test to compare the relative changes in range of motion among groups.
Results
The dual-cup (without flange) design improved external rotation at 0° abduction by 20.9° and improved IR by 11.5° compared to the 32 + 4 mm control (P < .01). In 90° abduction, the dual-cup improved external rotation by 11.9° compared to the 32 + 4 mm control, a significant improvement relative to the 36 + 6 mm control (P < .05). The dual-cup improved functional IR by 12.4° relative to the 32 + 4 mm control, a significant improvement relative to the 36 + 6 mm control (P < .05). The dual-cup did not significantly improve IR at 45° or 90° abduction compared to control models. Humeral component impingement on the glenoid was not observed at any end-range of motion in the implant with the flanged design.
Discussion
The dual-cup design improves all rotational motions relative to control models except IR with an abduction angle reaching or exceeding 45°. The dual-cup design improves impingement free motion, including functional IR, without additional lateralization in this study. The dual-dup with flange design eliminates impingement of the humeral cup on the glenoid neck without significantly affecting most motions relative to control models.
期刊介绍:
Each issue of Seminars in Arthroplasty provides a comprehensive, current overview of a single topic in arthroplasty. The journal addresses orthopedic surgeons, providing authoritative reviews with emphasis on new developments relevant to their practice.