Lin Lin, Yuqing Guo, Guangzhao Wang, Shilong Feng, Kai Liu, Mingcheng Hu, Mouxin Ye, Chunxi Cao, Ruohai Chen, Silong Ding, Zenghui Peng, Fenfen Ji, Yi-Jia Shih
{"title":"Changes in macrobenthos communities during the invasive Spartina alterniflora removal and mangrove restoration","authors":"Lin Lin, Yuqing Guo, Guangzhao Wang, Shilong Feng, Kai Liu, Mingcheng Hu, Mouxin Ye, Chunxi Cao, Ruohai Chen, Silong Ding, Zenghui Peng, Fenfen Ji, Yi-Jia Shih","doi":"10.3389/fmars.2025.1581442","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BackgroundThe mangrove ecosystem has been severely threatened by the invasive species <jats:italic>Spartina alterniflora</jats:italic> for a long time. The macrobenthos diversity, as a biological indicator for assessing ecosystem sensitivity, can respond sensitively to the removal of the invasive <jats:italic>S. alterniflora</jats:italic>. Traditional morphological method has been commonly used to study macrobenthos diversity. However, it is difficult to comprehensively and accurately assess using traditional morphological method alone. Few studies have systematically assessed the effectiveness of environmental DNA in monitoring the diversity of macrobenthos in mangrove ecosystems.MethodsTraditional morphological method and eDNA metabarcoding (using COI primers) were combined to analyze changes in macrobenthos diversity in September (before <jats:italic>S. alterniflora</jats:italic> removal), October (after <jats:italic>S. alterniflora</jats:italic> removal but before mangrove planting), and December (after <jats:italic>S. alterniflora</jats:italic> removal and mangrove planting) of 2022 at the Quanzhou Bay Mangrove Wetland Nature Reserve, Fujian Province, China.ResultsThe results showed that 26 species were identified using traditional morphological method, while 212 species were identified through eDNA metabarcoding, especially more Arthropod were detected. However, no species were found to be common between the two methods at the species level. In terms of abundance, Arthropods and Annelids were the dominant groups for two methods, both 28.38% in the traditional morphological method and 38.38% and 32.94% in the eDNA metabarcoding, respectively. Additionally, the traditional morphological method indicated that following the removal of <jats:italic>S. alterniflora</jats:italic>, species richness, density, biomass, and diversity indices of macrobenthos initially declined, but subsequently showed a consistent recovery trend.DiscussionOur study suggests that eDNA metabarcoding has tremendous potential to monitor macrobenthos diversity, but shows low consistency in species with traditional method. For broader application in macrobenthos diversity using eDNA metabarcoding, further optimization is needed. Additionally, the results suggested that after the removal of <jats:italic>S. alterniflora</jats:italic>, macrobenthos diversity initially declined but gradually recovered, and long-term monitoring is warranted in order to better understand the changes in macrobenthos diversity with planting of mangroves.","PeriodicalId":12479,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Marine Science","volume":"88 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Marine Science","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2025.1581442","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MARINE & FRESHWATER BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
BackgroundThe mangrove ecosystem has been severely threatened by the invasive species Spartina alterniflora for a long time. The macrobenthos diversity, as a biological indicator for assessing ecosystem sensitivity, can respond sensitively to the removal of the invasive S. alterniflora. Traditional morphological method has been commonly used to study macrobenthos diversity. However, it is difficult to comprehensively and accurately assess using traditional morphological method alone. Few studies have systematically assessed the effectiveness of environmental DNA in monitoring the diversity of macrobenthos in mangrove ecosystems.MethodsTraditional morphological method and eDNA metabarcoding (using COI primers) were combined to analyze changes in macrobenthos diversity in September (before S. alterniflora removal), October (after S. alterniflora removal but before mangrove planting), and December (after S. alterniflora removal and mangrove planting) of 2022 at the Quanzhou Bay Mangrove Wetland Nature Reserve, Fujian Province, China.ResultsThe results showed that 26 species were identified using traditional morphological method, while 212 species were identified through eDNA metabarcoding, especially more Arthropod were detected. However, no species were found to be common between the two methods at the species level. In terms of abundance, Arthropods and Annelids were the dominant groups for two methods, both 28.38% in the traditional morphological method and 38.38% and 32.94% in the eDNA metabarcoding, respectively. Additionally, the traditional morphological method indicated that following the removal of S. alterniflora, species richness, density, biomass, and diversity indices of macrobenthos initially declined, but subsequently showed a consistent recovery trend.DiscussionOur study suggests that eDNA metabarcoding has tremendous potential to monitor macrobenthos diversity, but shows low consistency in species with traditional method. For broader application in macrobenthos diversity using eDNA metabarcoding, further optimization is needed. Additionally, the results suggested that after the removal of S. alterniflora, macrobenthos diversity initially declined but gradually recovered, and long-term monitoring is warranted in order to better understand the changes in macrobenthos diversity with planting of mangroves.
期刊介绍:
Frontiers in Marine Science publishes rigorously peer-reviewed research that advances our understanding of all aspects of the environment, biology, ecosystem functioning and human interactions with the oceans. Field Chief Editor Carlos M. Duarte at King Abdullah University of Science and Technology Thuwal is supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international researchers. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, policy makers and the public worldwide.
With the human population predicted to reach 9 billion people by 2050, it is clear that traditional land resources will not suffice to meet the demand for food or energy, required to support high-quality livelihoods. As a result, the oceans are emerging as a source of untapped assets, with new innovative industries, such as aquaculture, marine biotechnology, marine energy and deep-sea mining growing rapidly under a new era characterized by rapid growth of a blue, ocean-based economy. The sustainability of the blue economy is closely dependent on our knowledge about how to mitigate the impacts of the multiple pressures on the ocean ecosystem associated with the increased scale and diversification of industry operations in the ocean and global human pressures on the environment. Therefore, Frontiers in Marine Science particularly welcomes the communication of research outcomes addressing ocean-based solutions for the emerging challenges, including improved forecasting and observational capacities, understanding biodiversity and ecosystem problems, locally and globally, effective management strategies to maintain ocean health, and an improved capacity to sustainably derive resources from the oceans.