The BARIREF Study: BARIatric Surgery Complications in Patients with Prior REFlux Surgery in a Large National Cohort.

IF 7.5 1区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Francesco Abboretti,Styliani Mantziari,Damien Bouriez,Caroline Gronnier,Andrea Lazzati
{"title":"The BARIREF Study: BARIatric Surgery Complications in Patients with Prior REFlux Surgery in a Large National Cohort.","authors":"Francesco Abboretti,Styliani Mantziari,Damien Bouriez,Caroline Gronnier,Andrea Lazzati","doi":"10.1097/sla.0000000000006742","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE\r\nTo assess the outcomes of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and sleeve gastrectomy (SG) in patients with prior fundoplication.\r\n\r\nSUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA\r\nObesity and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) often coexist, posing clinical challenges. Fundoplication is the standard treatment for GERD refractory to medical therapy. Managing obesity after fundoplication is complex and while RYGB is preferred for addressing both obesity and GERD, its use post-fundoplication requires further evaluation.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nRetrospective analysis of a national French database of patients undergoing RYGB and SG between 2013 and 2023. Patients were grouped according to prior fundoplication (PriorF) or no fundoplication (NoF). Baseline demographics and 90-day postoperative outcomes were assessed. Univariate and multivariate analyses identified risk factors; 1:5 matching was applied based on sex, age, body mass index, comorbidities, surgery year, procedure type and center volume.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nAmong 372,464 patients, 337 (0.1%) had prior fundoplication. PriorF patients had higher rates of severe postoperative complications (Dindo ≥IIIa: 8.9% vs. 3.7%, P < 0.001), longer hospital stays (4.5 ± 4.9 vs. 3.7 ± 2.9 d, P < 0.001), and higher readmission rates (17.8% vs. 10.6%, P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis for RYGB showed no significant association between prior fundoplication and complications (OR 1.71, 95% CI 1.00-2.74, P=0.051). Prior fundoplication was independently associated with increased complications after SG (OR 2.54, 95% CI 1.37-4.32, P < 0.001).\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nPrior fundoplication increased postoperative complications after SG but not after RYGB. RYGB appears to be the safer bariatric procedure in patients with prior fundoplication.","PeriodicalId":8017,"journal":{"name":"Annals of surgery","volume":"123 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0000000000006742","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To assess the outcomes of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and sleeve gastrectomy (SG) in patients with prior fundoplication. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA Obesity and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) often coexist, posing clinical challenges. Fundoplication is the standard treatment for GERD refractory to medical therapy. Managing obesity after fundoplication is complex and while RYGB is preferred for addressing both obesity and GERD, its use post-fundoplication requires further evaluation. METHODS Retrospective analysis of a national French database of patients undergoing RYGB and SG between 2013 and 2023. Patients were grouped according to prior fundoplication (PriorF) or no fundoplication (NoF). Baseline demographics and 90-day postoperative outcomes were assessed. Univariate and multivariate analyses identified risk factors; 1:5 matching was applied based on sex, age, body mass index, comorbidities, surgery year, procedure type and center volume. RESULTS Among 372,464 patients, 337 (0.1%) had prior fundoplication. PriorF patients had higher rates of severe postoperative complications (Dindo ≥IIIa: 8.9% vs. 3.7%, P < 0.001), longer hospital stays (4.5 ± 4.9 vs. 3.7 ± 2.9 d, P < 0.001), and higher readmission rates (17.8% vs. 10.6%, P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis for RYGB showed no significant association between prior fundoplication and complications (OR 1.71, 95% CI 1.00-2.74, P=0.051). Prior fundoplication was independently associated with increased complications after SG (OR 2.54, 95% CI 1.37-4.32, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Prior fundoplication increased postoperative complications after SG but not after RYGB. RYGB appears to be the safer bariatric procedure in patients with prior fundoplication.
barref研究:在一个大型国家队列中既往反流手术患者的减肥手术并发症
目的评价Roux-en-Y胃旁路术(RYGB)和袖胃切除术(SG)治疗既往胃底重复患者的疗效。背景数据肥胖和胃食管反流病(GERD)经常共存,给临床带来挑战。根治术是治疗药物治疗难治性胃食管反流的标准治疗方法。治疗盆底移植后的肥胖是复杂的,虽然RYGB是解决肥胖和胃食管反流的首选方法,但盆底移植后的使用需要进一步评估。方法回顾性分析2013年至2023年法国国家数据库中接受RYGB和SG治疗的患者。患者根据既往眼底复制(PriorF)或无眼底复制(NoF)进行分组。基线人口统计学和术后90天的结果进行评估。单因素和多因素分析确定了风险因素;根据性别、年龄、体重指数、合并症、手术年份、手术类型、中心容积进行1:5匹配。结果372,464例患者中,有337例(0.1%)既往有盆底塌陷。PriorF患者较高的严重术后并发症(Dindo≥iii a: 8.9%比3.7%,P < 0.001),住院时间较长的(4.5 ±  4.9和3.7±2.9 d P < 0.001),和再次住院的比例高(17.8%比10.6%,P < 0.001)。对RYGB的多因素分析显示,既往眼底重复与并发症无显著相关性(OR 1.71, 95% CI 1.00-2.74, P=0.051)。既往眼底重复与SG术后并发症增加独立相关(OR 2.54, 95% CI 1.37-4.32, P < 0.001)。结论术前基底复制增加了SG术后并发症的发生率,而RYGB术后无明显增加。RYGB似乎是更安全的减肥手术的患者既往的基金。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of surgery
Annals of surgery 医学-外科
CiteScore
14.40
自引率
4.40%
发文量
687
审稿时长
4 months
期刊介绍: The Annals of Surgery is a renowned surgery journal, recognized globally for its extensive scholarly references. It serves as a valuable resource for the international medical community by disseminating knowledge regarding important developments in surgical science and practice. Surgeons regularly turn to the Annals of Surgery to stay updated on innovative practices and techniques. The journal also offers special editorial features such as "Advances in Surgical Technique," offering timely coverage of ongoing clinical issues. Additionally, the journal publishes monthly review articles that address the latest concerns in surgical practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信