Impact of COVID-19 on Mental Health: Post-Traumatic Stress and Coping Strategies Among Thai University Students Using Ordinal Logistic Regression Analysis

Q3 Medicine
Peeradech Thichanpiang, Anuchart Kaunnil, Pornlada Nuchnoi, Chutikorn Nopparat, Khanokporn Donjdee, Kannika Permpoonputtana
{"title":"Impact of COVID-19 on Mental Health: Post-Traumatic Stress and Coping Strategies Among Thai University Students Using Ordinal Logistic Regression Analysis","authors":"Peeradech Thichanpiang,&nbsp;Anuchart Kaunnil,&nbsp;Pornlada Nuchnoi,&nbsp;Chutikorn Nopparat,&nbsp;Khanokporn Donjdee,&nbsp;Kannika Permpoonputtana","doi":"10.1002/lim2.70023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aims</h3>\n \n <p>COVID-19 disrupted education globally, resulting in the closure of schools and universities and the transition to distance learning. This shift heightened concerns about contracting the virus and increased insecurity in daily life and online education. The primary objective of this study is to investigate post-traumatic stress, perceived stress, coping strategies, and quality of life (QOL) among Thai university students, while also examining the relationships among coping strategies, stress levels, mental illness history, and overall QOL.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This study utilized a cross-sectional survey method, engaging 400 students through an online self-reported survey. The survey instruments included the post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) checklist for DSM-5, the Thai Version of the Perceived Stress Scale, the Brief Coping Orientation to Problems Experienced Inventory, and the WHOQOL Instrument-Short Form.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The study found that 21.25% of Thai university students likely experienced PTSD during the pandemic, with 74% reporting moderate stress and 4.25% experiencing high stress. Common coping strategies included acceptance, planning, active coping, self-distraction, and positive reframing, whereas self-blame was more prevalent among students with higher stress levels. QOL assessments showed that 2.75% of students rated their QOL as poor, 55.75% as moderate, and 41.50% as good. A strong negative correlation was observed between QOL and stress levels, indicating that students with lower QOL experienced higher stress. Additionally, maladaptive coping strategies, such as self-blame, denial, and behavioral disengagement, were positively associated with increased stress. Ordinal logistic regression analysis identified QOL as a significant predictor of perceived stress levels (odds ratios [OR] = 3.607), accounting for 31% of the variability in stress levels.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Students with poorer QOL experienced higher stress levels, underscoring the need for enhanced psychosocial services to support their mental health and overall well-being.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":74076,"journal":{"name":"Lifestyle medicine (Hoboken, N.J.)","volume":"6 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/lim2.70023","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lifestyle medicine (Hoboken, N.J.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/lim2.70023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims

COVID-19 disrupted education globally, resulting in the closure of schools and universities and the transition to distance learning. This shift heightened concerns about contracting the virus and increased insecurity in daily life and online education. The primary objective of this study is to investigate post-traumatic stress, perceived stress, coping strategies, and quality of life (QOL) among Thai university students, while also examining the relationships among coping strategies, stress levels, mental illness history, and overall QOL.

Methods

This study utilized a cross-sectional survey method, engaging 400 students through an online self-reported survey. The survey instruments included the post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) checklist for DSM-5, the Thai Version of the Perceived Stress Scale, the Brief Coping Orientation to Problems Experienced Inventory, and the WHOQOL Instrument-Short Form.

Results

The study found that 21.25% of Thai university students likely experienced PTSD during the pandemic, with 74% reporting moderate stress and 4.25% experiencing high stress. Common coping strategies included acceptance, planning, active coping, self-distraction, and positive reframing, whereas self-blame was more prevalent among students with higher stress levels. QOL assessments showed that 2.75% of students rated their QOL as poor, 55.75% as moderate, and 41.50% as good. A strong negative correlation was observed between QOL and stress levels, indicating that students with lower QOL experienced higher stress. Additionally, maladaptive coping strategies, such as self-blame, denial, and behavioral disengagement, were positively associated with increased stress. Ordinal logistic regression analysis identified QOL as a significant predictor of perceived stress levels (odds ratios [OR] = 3.607), accounting for 31% of the variability in stress levels.

Conclusions

Students with poorer QOL experienced higher stress levels, underscoring the need for enhanced psychosocial services to support their mental health and overall well-being.

新冠肺炎对心理健康的影响:泰国大学生创伤后应激及应对策略
2019冠状病毒病扰乱了全球的教育,导致学校和大学关闭,并向远程教育过渡。这种转变加剧了人们对感染病毒的担忧,增加了日常生活和在线教育的不安全感。摘要本研究旨在探讨泰国大学生的创伤后应激、感知应激、应对策略与生活质量(QOL),以及应对策略、压力水平、精神病史与总体生活质量之间的关系。方法本研究采用横断面调查法,对400名学生进行在线自我报告调查。调查工具包括DSM-5的创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)检查表、泰文压力感知量表、问题经历的简短应对倾向量表和WHOQOL工具-简表。研究发现,21.25%的泰国大学生可能在疫情期间经历过创伤后应激障碍,74%的大学生报告有中度压力,4.25%的大学生报告有高度压力。常见的应对策略包括接受、计划、积极应对、自我分散和积极重构,而自责在压力水平较高的学生中更为普遍。生活质量评估显示,2.75%的学生认为自己的生活质量差,55.75%的学生认为自己的生活质量一般,41.50%的学生认为自己的生活质量好。生活质量与压力水平呈显著负相关,表明生活质量越低的学生压力越大。此外,适应不良的应对策略,如自责、否认和行为脱离,与压力增加呈正相关。有序逻辑回归分析发现,生活质量是感知压力水平的显著预测因子(比值比[OR] = 3.607),占压力水平变异性的31%。结论:生活质量较差的学生压力水平较高,强调需要加强心理社会服务,以支持他们的心理健康和整体福祉。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
7 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信