Revisiting Härtel’s technique for percutaneous transoval glycerol injection

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Haldor Slettebø, Tomas Sakinis
{"title":"Revisiting Härtel’s technique for percutaneous transoval glycerol injection","authors":"Haldor Slettebø,&nbsp;Tomas Sakinis","doi":"10.1007/s00701-025-06526-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>Percutaneous transoval glycerol injection (GI) has been widely used since 1981 in the treatment of patients with trigeminal neuralgia. However, outcomes have been more variable than with other percutaneous treatments. Although most authors state that they use Härtel’s technique, the variations are numerous—which may explain procedural problems and most of the poor results. The aim of the present imaging-based study, therefore, was to revisit Härtel’s technique and identify optimal landmarks for guiding the needle from the cheek to Meckel’s cave.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>Eleven patients referred for trigeminal neuralgia were studied. We used CT- and MRI-based simulations to determine the optimal entry points in the cheek and trajectories through foramen ovale (FO) to reach Meckel’s cave – and compared our findings with the results from Härtel’s original study.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>The optimal entry point was located at 2 mm below the horizontal plane through the angle of the mouth and just in front of the anterior edge of the mandibular ramus. From this entry point—situated around 10 mm below Härtel’s preferred entry point—Meckel’s cave was easily accessible through the medial part of FO in 17 of 22 sides.</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The findings from this study suggest that the technical results of transoval glycerol injection can be improved if we 1. Select the optimal entry point, 2. Guide the needle under fluoroscopy through the medial part of the foramen ovale, and 3. Minimize movement of the soft tissues in the cheek.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7370,"journal":{"name":"Acta Neurochirurgica","volume":"167 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00701-025-06526-3.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Neurochirurgica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00701-025-06526-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Percutaneous transoval glycerol injection (GI) has been widely used since 1981 in the treatment of patients with trigeminal neuralgia. However, outcomes have been more variable than with other percutaneous treatments. Although most authors state that they use Härtel’s technique, the variations are numerous—which may explain procedural problems and most of the poor results. The aim of the present imaging-based study, therefore, was to revisit Härtel’s technique and identify optimal landmarks for guiding the needle from the cheek to Meckel’s cave.

Methods

Eleven patients referred for trigeminal neuralgia were studied. We used CT- and MRI-based simulations to determine the optimal entry points in the cheek and trajectories through foramen ovale (FO) to reach Meckel’s cave – and compared our findings with the results from Härtel’s original study.

Results

The optimal entry point was located at 2 mm below the horizontal plane through the angle of the mouth and just in front of the anterior edge of the mandibular ramus. From this entry point—situated around 10 mm below Härtel’s preferred entry point—Meckel’s cave was easily accessible through the medial part of FO in 17 of 22 sides.

Conclusion

The findings from this study suggest that the technical results of transoval glycerol injection can be improved if we 1. Select the optimal entry point, 2. Guide the needle under fluoroscopy through the medial part of the foramen ovale, and 3. Minimize movement of the soft tissues in the cheek.

重新审视Härtel经皮经颅甘油注射技术
目的自1981年以来,经皮经颅甘油注射(GI)被广泛应用于三叉神经痛的治疗。然而,与其他经皮治疗相比,其结果变化更大。尽管大多数作者声称他们使用了Härtel的技术,但差异很大,这可以解释程序问题和大多数糟糕的结果。因此,目前基于成像的研究的目的是重新审视Härtel的技术,并确定将针从脸颊引导到梅克尔洞穴的最佳地标。方法对6例三叉神经痛患者进行分析。我们使用基于CT和mri的模拟来确定脸颊的最佳入口点和通过卵圆孔(FO)到达梅克尔洞的轨迹,并将我们的发现与Härtel原始研究的结果进行比较。结果最佳入牙点位于通过口腔角的水平面下2 mm处,刚好在下颌支前缘的前方。从这个入口点(位于Härtel首选入口点下方约10毫米处)开始,meckel洞穴可以很容易地通过FO的内侧进入22侧中的17侧。结论经颅静脉注射甘油的技术效果可以通过以下措施得到改善。选择最优入口点,2。2 .在透视下引导针穿过卵圆孔内侧;尽量减少脸颊软组织的活动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Neurochirurgica
Acta Neurochirurgica 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
4.20%
发文量
342
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The journal "Acta Neurochirurgica" publishes only original papers useful both to research and clinical work. Papers should deal with clinical neurosurgery - diagnosis and diagnostic techniques, operative surgery and results, postoperative treatment - or with research work in neuroscience if the underlying questions or the results are of neurosurgical interest. Reports on congresses are given in brief accounts. As official organ of the European Association of Neurosurgical Societies the journal publishes all announcements of the E.A.N.S. and reports on the activities of its member societies. Only contributions written in English will be accepted.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信