{"title":"Revisiting Härtel’s technique for percutaneous transoval glycerol injection","authors":"Haldor Slettebø, Tomas Sakinis","doi":"10.1007/s00701-025-06526-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>Percutaneous transoval glycerol injection (GI) has been widely used since 1981 in the treatment of patients with trigeminal neuralgia. However, outcomes have been more variable than with other percutaneous treatments. Although most authors state that they use Härtel’s technique, the variations are numerous—which may explain procedural problems and most of the poor results. The aim of the present imaging-based study, therefore, was to revisit Härtel’s technique and identify optimal landmarks for guiding the needle from the cheek to Meckel’s cave.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>Eleven patients referred for trigeminal neuralgia were studied. We used CT- and MRI-based simulations to determine the optimal entry points in the cheek and trajectories through foramen ovale (FO) to reach Meckel’s cave – and compared our findings with the results from Härtel’s original study.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>The optimal entry point was located at 2 mm below the horizontal plane through the angle of the mouth and just in front of the anterior edge of the mandibular ramus. From this entry point—situated around 10 mm below Härtel’s preferred entry point—Meckel’s cave was easily accessible through the medial part of FO in 17 of 22 sides.</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The findings from this study suggest that the technical results of transoval glycerol injection can be improved if we 1. Select the optimal entry point, 2. Guide the needle under fluoroscopy through the medial part of the foramen ovale, and 3. Minimize movement of the soft tissues in the cheek.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7370,"journal":{"name":"Acta Neurochirurgica","volume":"167 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00701-025-06526-3.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Neurochirurgica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00701-025-06526-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose
Percutaneous transoval glycerol injection (GI) has been widely used since 1981 in the treatment of patients with trigeminal neuralgia. However, outcomes have been more variable than with other percutaneous treatments. Although most authors state that they use Härtel’s technique, the variations are numerous—which may explain procedural problems and most of the poor results. The aim of the present imaging-based study, therefore, was to revisit Härtel’s technique and identify optimal landmarks for guiding the needle from the cheek to Meckel’s cave.
Methods
Eleven patients referred for trigeminal neuralgia were studied. We used CT- and MRI-based simulations to determine the optimal entry points in the cheek and trajectories through foramen ovale (FO) to reach Meckel’s cave – and compared our findings with the results from Härtel’s original study.
Results
The optimal entry point was located at 2 mm below the horizontal plane through the angle of the mouth and just in front of the anterior edge of the mandibular ramus. From this entry point—situated around 10 mm below Härtel’s preferred entry point—Meckel’s cave was easily accessible through the medial part of FO in 17 of 22 sides.
Conclusion
The findings from this study suggest that the technical results of transoval glycerol injection can be improved if we 1. Select the optimal entry point, 2. Guide the needle under fluoroscopy through the medial part of the foramen ovale, and 3. Minimize movement of the soft tissues in the cheek.
期刊介绍:
The journal "Acta Neurochirurgica" publishes only original papers useful both to research and clinical work. Papers should deal with clinical neurosurgery - diagnosis and diagnostic techniques, operative surgery and results, postoperative treatment - or with research work in neuroscience if the underlying questions or the results are of neurosurgical interest. Reports on congresses are given in brief accounts. As official organ of the European Association of Neurosurgical Societies the journal publishes all announcements of the E.A.N.S. and reports on the activities of its member societies. Only contributions written in English will be accepted.