Comparison of gap-filling methods for generating landsat-like land surface temperatures under all-weather conditions

IF 10.6 1区 地球科学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL
Jiali Guo , Jinling Quan , Wenfeng Zhan , Zhongguan Wen
{"title":"Comparison of gap-filling methods for generating landsat-like land surface temperatures under all-weather conditions","authors":"Jiali Guo ,&nbsp;Jinling Quan ,&nbsp;Wenfeng Zhan ,&nbsp;Zhongguan Wen","doi":"10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2025.04.029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Thermal infrared remote sensors provide cost-effective and widespread land surface temperatures (LSTs) but often with spatiotemporal gaps due to discrete sampling and synoptic disturbance, greatly limiting their reliability and application. Current gap-filling methods have been primarily developed and validated for medium- to low-resolution LSTs; however, with rising demand for spatiotemporally continuous, high-resolution (tens of meters like Landsat) LSTs across disciplines, there is an urgent need to assess these methods’ applicability and uncertainty at higher spatial resolutions under a unified framework. In this study, we apply eight typical and hybrid methods, including temporal interpolation, spatiotemporal interpolation, weight-based fusion, learning-based fusion, and four standard annual temperature cycle (ATC)-based hybrid reconstructions, to fill gaps in irregularly spaced Landsat series over Weishan, Huairou, and Yulin, China. These sites represent cropland in a sub-humid plain, forest in a sub-humid mountain region, and grassland in the semi-arid Loess Plateau. We evaluate their performance in terms of spatiotemporal pattern, statistical accuracy, sensitivity to input data quality and distribution, and adaptability to different synoptic and surface conditions based on cloudy Landsat data and in-situ measurements. Results reveal that the enhanced ATC (EATC) method is optimal among these methods, capturing all-weather spatiotemporal dynamics at the Landsat scale with superior accuracy and robustness under various input, cloud, and ground conditions. In addition, the ATC-based hybrid methods do not necessarily improve the statistical accuracy over their respective typical ones. This comprehensive evaluation provides valuable insights into the selection of appropriate gap-filling methods for generating Landsat-like LSTs under all-weather conditions and highlights the need for further advancements especially in addressing abrupt changes in land cover types and temporal sparsity in high-resolution LST observations to improve accuracy, stability, and generality.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50269,"journal":{"name":"ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing","volume":"225 ","pages":"Pages 113-130"},"PeriodicalIF":10.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0924271625001650","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Thermal infrared remote sensors provide cost-effective and widespread land surface temperatures (LSTs) but often with spatiotemporal gaps due to discrete sampling and synoptic disturbance, greatly limiting their reliability and application. Current gap-filling methods have been primarily developed and validated for medium- to low-resolution LSTs; however, with rising demand for spatiotemporally continuous, high-resolution (tens of meters like Landsat) LSTs across disciplines, there is an urgent need to assess these methods’ applicability and uncertainty at higher spatial resolutions under a unified framework. In this study, we apply eight typical and hybrid methods, including temporal interpolation, spatiotemporal interpolation, weight-based fusion, learning-based fusion, and four standard annual temperature cycle (ATC)-based hybrid reconstructions, to fill gaps in irregularly spaced Landsat series over Weishan, Huairou, and Yulin, China. These sites represent cropland in a sub-humid plain, forest in a sub-humid mountain region, and grassland in the semi-arid Loess Plateau. We evaluate their performance in terms of spatiotemporal pattern, statistical accuracy, sensitivity to input data quality and distribution, and adaptability to different synoptic and surface conditions based on cloudy Landsat data and in-situ measurements. Results reveal that the enhanced ATC (EATC) method is optimal among these methods, capturing all-weather spatiotemporal dynamics at the Landsat scale with superior accuracy and robustness under various input, cloud, and ground conditions. In addition, the ATC-based hybrid methods do not necessarily improve the statistical accuracy over their respective typical ones. This comprehensive evaluation provides valuable insights into the selection of appropriate gap-filling methods for generating Landsat-like LSTs under all-weather conditions and highlights the need for further advancements especially in addressing abrupt changes in land cover types and temporal sparsity in high-resolution LST observations to improve accuracy, stability, and generality.
全天候条件下产生类似陆地卫星地表温度的填隙方法比较
热红外遥感器提供了具有成本效益和广泛分布的地表温度,但由于采样离散和天气干扰,往往存在时空差距,极大地限制了其可靠性和应用。目前的空白填充方法主要是针对中低分辨率LSTs开发和验证的;然而,随着对时空连续、高分辨率(如Landsat等几十米)的跨学科lst需求的不断增长,迫切需要在统一的框架下评估这些方法在更高空间分辨率下的适用性和不确定性。在这项研究中,我们采用8种典型的混合方法,包括时间插值、时空插值、基于权重的融合、基于学习的融合和4种基于标准年温度周期(ATC)的混合重建,来填补中国魏山、怀柔和玉林地区不规则间隔的Landsat序列的空白。这些遗址代表了半湿润平原的农田、半湿润山区的森林和半干旱黄土高原的草地。我们从时空格局、统计精度、对输入数据质量和分布的敏感性以及对不同天气和地面条件的适应性等方面对它们的性能进行了评估。结果表明,增强型ATC (EATC)方法在这些方法中是最优的,在不同的输入、云和地面条件下,以优异的精度和鲁棒性捕获陆地卫星尺度下的全天候时空动态。此外,基于atc的混合方法并不一定比其各自的典型方法提高统计精度。这一综合评估为在全天候条件下生成类似landsat的地表温度的适当空白填充方法的选择提供了有价值的见解,并强调了进一步发展的必要性,特别是在解决高分辨率地表温度观测中土地覆盖类型的突变和时间稀疏性方面,以提高精度、稳定性和普遍性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing
ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 工程技术-成像科学与照相技术
CiteScore
21.00
自引率
6.30%
发文量
273
审稿时长
40 days
期刊介绍: The ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing (P&RS) serves as the official journal of the International Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing (ISPRS). It acts as a platform for scientists and professionals worldwide who are involved in various disciplines that utilize photogrammetry, remote sensing, spatial information systems, computer vision, and related fields. The journal aims to facilitate communication and dissemination of advancements in these disciplines, while also acting as a comprehensive source of reference and archive. P&RS endeavors to publish high-quality, peer-reviewed research papers that are preferably original and have not been published before. These papers can cover scientific/research, technological development, or application/practical aspects. Additionally, the journal welcomes papers that are based on presentations from ISPRS meetings, as long as they are considered significant contributions to the aforementioned fields. In particular, P&RS encourages the submission of papers that are of broad scientific interest, showcase innovative applications (especially in emerging fields), have an interdisciplinary focus, discuss topics that have received limited attention in P&RS or related journals, or explore new directions in scientific or professional realms. It is preferred that theoretical papers include practical applications, while papers focusing on systems and applications should include a theoretical background.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信