{"title":"Comparison of gap-filling methods for generating landsat-like land surface temperatures under all-weather conditions","authors":"Jiali Guo , Jinling Quan , Wenfeng Zhan , Zhongguan Wen","doi":"10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2025.04.029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Thermal infrared remote sensors provide cost-effective and widespread land surface temperatures (LSTs) but often with spatiotemporal gaps due to discrete sampling and synoptic disturbance, greatly limiting their reliability and application. Current gap-filling methods have been primarily developed and validated for medium- to low-resolution LSTs; however, with rising demand for spatiotemporally continuous, high-resolution (tens of meters like Landsat) LSTs across disciplines, there is an urgent need to assess these methods’ applicability and uncertainty at higher spatial resolutions under a unified framework. In this study, we apply eight typical and hybrid methods, including temporal interpolation, spatiotemporal interpolation, weight-based fusion, learning-based fusion, and four standard annual temperature cycle (ATC)-based hybrid reconstructions, to fill gaps in irregularly spaced Landsat series over Weishan, Huairou, and Yulin, China. These sites represent cropland in a sub-humid plain, forest in a sub-humid mountain region, and grassland in the semi-arid Loess Plateau. We evaluate their performance in terms of spatiotemporal pattern, statistical accuracy, sensitivity to input data quality and distribution, and adaptability to different synoptic and surface conditions based on cloudy Landsat data and in-situ measurements. Results reveal that the enhanced ATC (EATC) method is optimal among these methods, capturing all-weather spatiotemporal dynamics at the Landsat scale with superior accuracy and robustness under various input, cloud, and ground conditions. In addition, the ATC-based hybrid methods do not necessarily improve the statistical accuracy over their respective typical ones. This comprehensive evaluation provides valuable insights into the selection of appropriate gap-filling methods for generating Landsat-like LSTs under all-weather conditions and highlights the need for further advancements especially in addressing abrupt changes in land cover types and temporal sparsity in high-resolution LST observations to improve accuracy, stability, and generality.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50269,"journal":{"name":"ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing","volume":"225 ","pages":"Pages 113-130"},"PeriodicalIF":10.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0924271625001650","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Thermal infrared remote sensors provide cost-effective and widespread land surface temperatures (LSTs) but often with spatiotemporal gaps due to discrete sampling and synoptic disturbance, greatly limiting their reliability and application. Current gap-filling methods have been primarily developed and validated for medium- to low-resolution LSTs; however, with rising demand for spatiotemporally continuous, high-resolution (tens of meters like Landsat) LSTs across disciplines, there is an urgent need to assess these methods’ applicability and uncertainty at higher spatial resolutions under a unified framework. In this study, we apply eight typical and hybrid methods, including temporal interpolation, spatiotemporal interpolation, weight-based fusion, learning-based fusion, and four standard annual temperature cycle (ATC)-based hybrid reconstructions, to fill gaps in irregularly spaced Landsat series over Weishan, Huairou, and Yulin, China. These sites represent cropland in a sub-humid plain, forest in a sub-humid mountain region, and grassland in the semi-arid Loess Plateau. We evaluate their performance in terms of spatiotemporal pattern, statistical accuracy, sensitivity to input data quality and distribution, and adaptability to different synoptic and surface conditions based on cloudy Landsat data and in-situ measurements. Results reveal that the enhanced ATC (EATC) method is optimal among these methods, capturing all-weather spatiotemporal dynamics at the Landsat scale with superior accuracy and robustness under various input, cloud, and ground conditions. In addition, the ATC-based hybrid methods do not necessarily improve the statistical accuracy over their respective typical ones. This comprehensive evaluation provides valuable insights into the selection of appropriate gap-filling methods for generating Landsat-like LSTs under all-weather conditions and highlights the need for further advancements especially in addressing abrupt changes in land cover types and temporal sparsity in high-resolution LST observations to improve accuracy, stability, and generality.
期刊介绍:
The ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing (P&RS) serves as the official journal of the International Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing (ISPRS). It acts as a platform for scientists and professionals worldwide who are involved in various disciplines that utilize photogrammetry, remote sensing, spatial information systems, computer vision, and related fields. The journal aims to facilitate communication and dissemination of advancements in these disciplines, while also acting as a comprehensive source of reference and archive.
P&RS endeavors to publish high-quality, peer-reviewed research papers that are preferably original and have not been published before. These papers can cover scientific/research, technological development, or application/practical aspects. Additionally, the journal welcomes papers that are based on presentations from ISPRS meetings, as long as they are considered significant contributions to the aforementioned fields.
In particular, P&RS encourages the submission of papers that are of broad scientific interest, showcase innovative applications (especially in emerging fields), have an interdisciplinary focus, discuss topics that have received limited attention in P&RS or related journals, or explore new directions in scientific or professional realms. It is preferred that theoretical papers include practical applications, while papers focusing on systems and applications should include a theoretical background.