{"title":"Dynamic analysis of the proportional order-up-to policy with damped trend forecasts","authors":"Qinyun Li , Gerard Gaalman , Stephen M. Disney","doi":"10.1016/j.ijpe.2025.109612","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>We study the bullwhip behaviour in the proportional order-up-to (POUT) policy with non-stationary autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) demand. We build a state-space model of the POUT policy where the damped trend forecasting method predicts ARIMA(1,1,2) demand. The POUT policy is closely related to the order-to-up (OUT) policy with the addition of a proportional feedback controller in the inventory and work-in-progress feedback loops. Our modelling approach allows us to derive and/or analyse the demand, order, and inventory variances. We also find the covariance between the demand forecast and the inventory forecast in an attempt to obtain the order variance. However, both the demand and the order variances are infinite under the non-stationary ARIMA(1,1,2) process. Thus, the traditional bullwhip measure (the ratio of the order variance divided by the demand variance) is indeterminate. Despite this difficulty, we can study the difference between the order variance and the demand variance for both the OUT and POUT policies. These differences are finite and their sign indicates whether a bullwhip effect has been generated or not. We find under non-stationary demand, the POUT policy’s bullwhip behaviour contradicts some of the existing bullwhip theory. The POUT policy sometimes generates more bullwhip than the OUT policy, revealing that existing knowledge based on stationary demand should be used with caution in non-stationary demand environments. We validate our findings with an investigation of some ARIMA(1,1,2) time series from the M4 competition.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":14287,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Production Economics","volume":"285 ","pages":"Article 109612"},"PeriodicalIF":10.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Production Economics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925527325000970","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
We study the bullwhip behaviour in the proportional order-up-to (POUT) policy with non-stationary autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) demand. We build a state-space model of the POUT policy where the damped trend forecasting method predicts ARIMA(1,1,2) demand. The POUT policy is closely related to the order-to-up (OUT) policy with the addition of a proportional feedback controller in the inventory and work-in-progress feedback loops. Our modelling approach allows us to derive and/or analyse the demand, order, and inventory variances. We also find the covariance between the demand forecast and the inventory forecast in an attempt to obtain the order variance. However, both the demand and the order variances are infinite under the non-stationary ARIMA(1,1,2) process. Thus, the traditional bullwhip measure (the ratio of the order variance divided by the demand variance) is indeterminate. Despite this difficulty, we can study the difference between the order variance and the demand variance for both the OUT and POUT policies. These differences are finite and their sign indicates whether a bullwhip effect has been generated or not. We find under non-stationary demand, the POUT policy’s bullwhip behaviour contradicts some of the existing bullwhip theory. The POUT policy sometimes generates more bullwhip than the OUT policy, revealing that existing knowledge based on stationary demand should be used with caution in non-stationary demand environments. We validate our findings with an investigation of some ARIMA(1,1,2) time series from the M4 competition.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Production Economics focuses on the interface between engineering and management. It covers all aspects of manufacturing and process industries, as well as production in general. The journal is interdisciplinary, considering activities throughout the product life cycle and material flow cycle. It aims to disseminate knowledge for improving industrial practice and strengthening the theoretical base for decision making. The journal serves as a forum for exchanging ideas and presenting new developments in theory and application, combining academic standards with practical value for industrial applications.