Use of harm reduction practices by state-licensed specialty substance use treatment programs

0 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Isha K. Desai , Kathryn Burke , Yuzhong Li , Valerie Ganetsky , Olivia K. Sugarman , Noa Krawczyk , Kenneth A. Feder
{"title":"Use of harm reduction practices by state-licensed specialty substance use treatment programs","authors":"Isha K. Desai ,&nbsp;Kathryn Burke ,&nbsp;Yuzhong Li ,&nbsp;Valerie Ganetsky ,&nbsp;Olivia K. Sugarman ,&nbsp;Noa Krawczyk ,&nbsp;Kenneth A. Feder","doi":"10.1016/j.josat.2025.209711","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Specialty substance use treatment programs may adopt harm reduction practices to protect the health of their patients with opioid use disorder (OUD). Two such harm reduction strategies are distributing naloxone to clients and refraining from discharging clients if they have positive urine drug screens for drugs. The purpose of this study was to understand the prevalence of programs that adopt each of these harm reduction practices and the characteristics of clients attending programs that adopt both practices in a sample of state-licensed substance use treatment programs in New Jersey.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted a cross-sectional survey of specialty treatment programs in New Jersey about a) naloxone dispensing and b) use of urine toxicology screens in client discharge decisions. We linked this survey to the treatment programs' administrative records of client admissions for OUD treatment between July 2021 to June 2022 (<em>n</em> = 14,838). We estimated the proportion of programs that reported that they adopted each practice. We then examined program and client characteristics associated with applying these harm reduction practices using regression methods.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 108 programs included in this analysis, 55.6 % dispensed naloxone and 50.9 % did not consider toxicology screens in discharge decisions. Opioid treatment programs (OTP) were significantly more likely to adopt both harm reduction practices than non-OTPs. Clients referred by correctional programs, as opposed to self-referred to treatment, were significantly less likely to attend a program that used either harm reduction practice.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Our findings suggest efforts are needed to increase adoption of harm reduction practices in SUD treatment settings, especially that are not OTPs, and programs serving clients referred by the criminal justice system.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":73960,"journal":{"name":"Journal of substance use and addiction treatment","volume":"174 ","pages":"Article 209711"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of substance use and addiction treatment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949875925000906","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Specialty substance use treatment programs may adopt harm reduction practices to protect the health of their patients with opioid use disorder (OUD). Two such harm reduction strategies are distributing naloxone to clients and refraining from discharging clients if they have positive urine drug screens for drugs. The purpose of this study was to understand the prevalence of programs that adopt each of these harm reduction practices and the characteristics of clients attending programs that adopt both practices in a sample of state-licensed substance use treatment programs in New Jersey.

Methods

We conducted a cross-sectional survey of specialty treatment programs in New Jersey about a) naloxone dispensing and b) use of urine toxicology screens in client discharge decisions. We linked this survey to the treatment programs' administrative records of client admissions for OUD treatment between July 2021 to June 2022 (n = 14,838). We estimated the proportion of programs that reported that they adopted each practice. We then examined program and client characteristics associated with applying these harm reduction practices using regression methods.

Results

Of 108 programs included in this analysis, 55.6 % dispensed naloxone and 50.9 % did not consider toxicology screens in discharge decisions. Opioid treatment programs (OTP) were significantly more likely to adopt both harm reduction practices than non-OTPs. Clients referred by correctional programs, as opposed to self-referred to treatment, were significantly less likely to attend a program that used either harm reduction practice.

Conclusions

Our findings suggest efforts are needed to increase adoption of harm reduction practices in SUD treatment settings, especially that are not OTPs, and programs serving clients referred by the criminal justice system.
通过国家许可的特殊物质使用治疗项目使用减少危害的做法
专业物质使用治疗方案可以采用减少危害的做法来保护阿片类药物使用障碍(OUD)患者的健康。两种减少危害的策略是向客户分发纳洛酮,如果客户尿液药物筛查呈阳性,则不要让他们出院。本研究的目的是了解在新泽西州国家许可的物质使用治疗项目样本中采用这两种减少危害做法的项目的流行程度,以及采用这两种做法的项目的客户特征。方法我们对新泽西州的专科治疗方案进行了横断面调查,调查内容包括a)纳洛酮配药和b)在病人出院决策中使用尿液毒理学筛查。我们将该调查与2021年7月至2022年6月期间接受OUD治疗的客户入院的治疗项目管理记录联系起来(n = 14,838)。我们估计了报告采用每种实践的项目的比例。然后,我们使用回归方法检查了与应用这些减少危害实践相关的项目和客户特征。结果在纳入本分析的108个项目中,55.6%的项目使用了纳洛酮,50.9%的项目在决定出院时没有考虑毒理学筛查。阿片类药物治疗方案(OTP)比非OTP更有可能采用这两种减少危害的做法。与自我推荐的治疗相比,被矫正项目推荐的患者,更不可能参加使用减少伤害实践的项目。结论:我们的研究结果表明,需要努力在SUD治疗环境中增加减少伤害的做法,特别是在非otp治疗环境中,以及为刑事司法系统转介的客户提供服务的项目中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of substance use and addiction treatment
Journal of substance use and addiction treatment Biological Psychiatry, Neuroscience (General), Psychiatry and Mental Health, Psychology (General)
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信