{"title":"Single Extracellular Vesicle Profiling: Harnessing NanoFlow Cytometry for Quantitative Surface Marker Analysis","authors":"M. Cramer , S. Lenzini , E. Zakhem , J.A. Rowley","doi":"10.1016/j.jcyt.2025.03.042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background & Aim</h3><div>Heterogeneity of extracellular vesicle (EV) populations complicates their study, as traditional bulk analysis methods fail to capture individual differences in size, content, and surface markers. Single-vesicle analysis offers a more precise approach, enabling detailed characterization of EV subpopulations. In this study, we developed protocols for calibrated NanoFlow cytometry to quantify single-vesicle surface marker expression and applied them to purified MSC-EVs from three different tissue sources.</div></div><div><h3>Methodology</h3><div>We generated highly purified MSC-EVs through RoosterBio established production and purification protocols. EV tetraspanin identity markers (CD81 and CD63) and MSC identity marker (CD73) were selected for single-vesicle analysis. For each antibody, optimization steps were performed to identify the optimal staining protocol. Beads with known equivalent reference fluorophore (ERF) values were obtained from NanoFCM. Data was acquired on the NanoFCM Flow NanoAnalyzer and single-vesicle analysis methods were established to quantify the number of CD molecules per particle. The lower limit of detection was determined by background fluorescence. We then applied this analysis to purified EVs from bone marrow (BM), umbilical cord (UC), and adipose (AD) MSC-EVs.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Antibody titration was used to select a dilution of 800X for samples at 1 × 10<sup>10</sup> P/mL. A standard curve was generated from ERF beads to calibrate arbitrary fluorescence intensity to units of Alexa Fluor™ 488. The antibody-specific limit of detection for positive expression was between 4 – 10 molecules per particle. Across all tissue sources, particles were 50 – 70% CD81+, 40 – 60% CD63+, and 15 – 35% CD73+. Single-vesicle analysis suggested CD81 and CD63 were enriched on AD-EVs (40 CD81, 53 CD63 per particle) compared to UC-EVs (33 CD81, 44 CD63 per particle) and BM-EVs (30 CD81, 41 CD63 per particle). CD73 was preferentially expressed on larger EVs and showed ∼20 CD73 per particle for all tissue sources.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>We successfully developed single-vesicle quantitation of EV surface markers by calibrated NanoFlow cytometry. Application of this novel analysis not only showed retention of CD81, CD63, and CD73 in our highly purified EVs, but also discerned tissue- and marker-dependent differences in EV properties. This high-resolution characterization of EVs can advance our understanding of EV diversity, aid interpretation of EV bioactivity, and support development of methods to enrich specific EV subtypes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50597,"journal":{"name":"Cytotherapy","volume":"27 5","pages":"Page S28"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cytotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1465324925001288","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background & Aim
Heterogeneity of extracellular vesicle (EV) populations complicates their study, as traditional bulk analysis methods fail to capture individual differences in size, content, and surface markers. Single-vesicle analysis offers a more precise approach, enabling detailed characterization of EV subpopulations. In this study, we developed protocols for calibrated NanoFlow cytometry to quantify single-vesicle surface marker expression and applied them to purified MSC-EVs from three different tissue sources.
Methodology
We generated highly purified MSC-EVs through RoosterBio established production and purification protocols. EV tetraspanin identity markers (CD81 and CD63) and MSC identity marker (CD73) were selected for single-vesicle analysis. For each antibody, optimization steps were performed to identify the optimal staining protocol. Beads with known equivalent reference fluorophore (ERF) values were obtained from NanoFCM. Data was acquired on the NanoFCM Flow NanoAnalyzer and single-vesicle analysis methods were established to quantify the number of CD molecules per particle. The lower limit of detection was determined by background fluorescence. We then applied this analysis to purified EVs from bone marrow (BM), umbilical cord (UC), and adipose (AD) MSC-EVs.
Results
Antibody titration was used to select a dilution of 800X for samples at 1 × 1010 P/mL. A standard curve was generated from ERF beads to calibrate arbitrary fluorescence intensity to units of Alexa Fluor™ 488. The antibody-specific limit of detection for positive expression was between 4 – 10 molecules per particle. Across all tissue sources, particles were 50 – 70% CD81+, 40 – 60% CD63+, and 15 – 35% CD73+. Single-vesicle analysis suggested CD81 and CD63 were enriched on AD-EVs (40 CD81, 53 CD63 per particle) compared to UC-EVs (33 CD81, 44 CD63 per particle) and BM-EVs (30 CD81, 41 CD63 per particle). CD73 was preferentially expressed on larger EVs and showed ∼20 CD73 per particle for all tissue sources.
Conclusion
We successfully developed single-vesicle quantitation of EV surface markers by calibrated NanoFlow cytometry. Application of this novel analysis not only showed retention of CD81, CD63, and CD73 in our highly purified EVs, but also discerned tissue- and marker-dependent differences in EV properties. This high-resolution characterization of EVs can advance our understanding of EV diversity, aid interpretation of EV bioactivity, and support development of methods to enrich specific EV subtypes.
期刊介绍:
The journal brings readers the latest developments in the fast moving field of cellular therapy in man. This includes cell therapy for cancer, immune disorders, inherited diseases, tissue repair and regenerative medicine. The journal covers the science, translational development and treatment with variety of cell types including hematopoietic stem cells, immune cells (dendritic cells, NK, cells, T cells, antigen presenting cells) mesenchymal stromal cells, adipose cells, nerve, muscle, vascular and endothelial cells, and induced pluripotential stem cells. We also welcome manuscripts on subcellular derivatives such as exosomes. A specific focus is on translational research that brings cell therapy to the clinic. Cytotherapy publishes original papers, reviews, position papers editorials, commentaries and letters to the editor. We welcome "Protocols in Cytotherapy" bringing standard operating procedure for production specific cell types for clinical use within the reach of the readership.