Personalised risk-prediction tools for cryptococcal meningitis mortality to guide treatment stratification in sub-Saharan Africa: a prognostic modelling study based on pooled analysis of two randomised controlled trials.

IF 19.9 1区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Thomas H A Samuels,Sile F Molloy,David S Lawrence,Angela Loyse,Cecilia Kanyama,Robert S Heyderman,Wai Shing Lai,Sayoki Mfinanga,Sokoine Lesikari,Duncan Chanda,Charles Kouanfack,Elvis Temfack,Olivier Lortholary,Mina C Hosseinipour,Adrienne K Chan,David B Meya,David R Boulware,Henry C Mwandumba,Graeme Meintjes,Conrad Muzoora,Mosepele Mosepele,Chiratidzo E Ndhlovu,Nabila Youssouf,Thomas S Harrison,Joseph N Jarvis,Rishi K Gupta
{"title":"Personalised risk-prediction tools for cryptococcal meningitis mortality to guide treatment stratification in sub-Saharan Africa: a prognostic modelling study based on pooled analysis of two randomised controlled trials.","authors":"Thomas H A Samuels,Sile F Molloy,David S Lawrence,Angela Loyse,Cecilia Kanyama,Robert S Heyderman,Wai Shing Lai,Sayoki Mfinanga,Sokoine Lesikari,Duncan Chanda,Charles Kouanfack,Elvis Temfack,Olivier Lortholary,Mina C Hosseinipour,Adrienne K Chan,David B Meya,David R Boulware,Henry C Mwandumba,Graeme Meintjes,Conrad Muzoora,Mosepele Mosepele,Chiratidzo E Ndhlovu,Nabila Youssouf,Thomas S Harrison,Joseph N Jarvis,Rishi K Gupta","doi":"10.1016/s2214-109x(25)00010-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nCryptococcal meningitis is a major driver of global HIV-related mortality, and validated approaches to stratify mortality risk could help to target effective treatment strategies. We aimed to develop and validate models to predict risk of all-cause mortality in people with HIV-associated cryptococcal meningitis in sub-Saharan African countries.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nFor this prediction modelling study, we pooled individual-level data from the ACTA (ISRCTN45035509) and AMBITION-cm (ISRCTN72509687) randomised controlled trials. Data in ACTA were collected between Feb 12, 2013, and Jan 10, 2017, and data in AMBITION-cm were collected between Jan 31, 2018, and June 11, 2021. Adults aged 18 years or older with a first episode of HIV-associated cryptococcal meningitis were recruited to both trials. Exclusion criteria included pregnancy or lactation; receipt of high-dose anti-fungal treatment doses before screening; and contraindications to trial medication. Participants were recruited from nine hospitals across Cameroon, Malawi, Tanzania, and Zambia in ACTA and eight hospitals across Botswana, Malawi, South Africa, Uganda, and Zimbabwe in AMBITION-cm. We developed two primary multivariable logistic-regression models for the primary outcome of 2-week mortality: a basic model for use in a resource-limited setting that contained only candidate predictors that are routinely, programmatically obtained at hospital admission and a research model for which all predefined candidate predictors were considered for inclusion. We used internal-external cross-validation to evaluate model performance across countries within the development cohort (ie, data from all countries except Malawi participants in AMBITION-cm), before validation of discrimination, calibration, and net benefit in held-out data from Malawi.\r\n\r\nFINDINGS\r\nWe included 674 eligible participants from ACTA and 814 from AMBITION-cm in the pooled analysis (total sample size 1488). 1263 participants were included in model development, with 225 from the Malawi site in AMBITION-cm held out for validation. 222 (17·6%) of 1263 participants in the development set and 21 (9·3%) of 225 participants in the validation set met the primary model outcome of 2-week mortality. We retained five predictors in the basic model and seven in the research model. Predictors in both models were Glasgow Coma Scale score, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, haemoglobin, blood neutrophil count, and treatment. Additional predictors in the research model were cerebrospinal fluid opening pressure and log10 cerebrospinal fluid quantitative cryptococcal culture. Discrimination was relatively consistent between study sites for both models (pooled C statistic 0·75 [95% CI 0·68-0·82] for the basic model and 0·78 [0·75-0·82] for the research model), but calibration was more heterogeneous (pooled calibration slope 0·87 [95% CI 0·57 to 1·17] and 0·83 [0·69 to 0·97], pooled calibration in the large 0·00 [-0·54 to 0·55] and -0·02 [-0·46 to 0·42], for the basic and research models, respectively). In held-out validation, discrimination of both models was slightly higher than estimates from internal-external cross-validation (C statistic 0·78 [95% CI 0·70-0·87] in the basic model and 0·85 [0·79-0·92] in the research model). Calibration assessment suggested overestimation of risk, particularly in the high-risk range: calibration slope 1·04 (95% CI 0·54 to 1·55), calibration in the large -0·55 (-1·02 to -0·07). When comparing single, high-dose liposomal amphotericin B plus 14 days of flucytosine plus fluconazole with 1 week of amphotericin B plus flucytosine in AMBITION-cm, hazard ratios were 0·50 (95% CI 0·26-0·97) in the low-risk stratum and 0·96 (0·67-1·37) in the high-risk stratum for the basic model, and 0·61 (0·31-1·18) in the low-risk stratum and 1·03 (0·72-1·47) in the high-risk stratum for the research model.\r\n\r\nINTERPRETATION\r\nBoth models accurately predicted 2-week mortality in people with HIV and have the potential to be incorporated into future treatment-stratification approaches in low-income and middle-income countries.\r\n\r\nFUNDING\r\nNational Institute for Health Research.","PeriodicalId":48783,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Global Health","volume":"18 1","pages":"e920-e930"},"PeriodicalIF":19.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lancet Global Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/s2214-109x(25)00010-5","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND Cryptococcal meningitis is a major driver of global HIV-related mortality, and validated approaches to stratify mortality risk could help to target effective treatment strategies. We aimed to develop and validate models to predict risk of all-cause mortality in people with HIV-associated cryptococcal meningitis in sub-Saharan African countries. METHODS For this prediction modelling study, we pooled individual-level data from the ACTA (ISRCTN45035509) and AMBITION-cm (ISRCTN72509687) randomised controlled trials. Data in ACTA were collected between Feb 12, 2013, and Jan 10, 2017, and data in AMBITION-cm were collected between Jan 31, 2018, and June 11, 2021. Adults aged 18 years or older with a first episode of HIV-associated cryptococcal meningitis were recruited to both trials. Exclusion criteria included pregnancy or lactation; receipt of high-dose anti-fungal treatment doses before screening; and contraindications to trial medication. Participants were recruited from nine hospitals across Cameroon, Malawi, Tanzania, and Zambia in ACTA and eight hospitals across Botswana, Malawi, South Africa, Uganda, and Zimbabwe in AMBITION-cm. We developed two primary multivariable logistic-regression models for the primary outcome of 2-week mortality: a basic model for use in a resource-limited setting that contained only candidate predictors that are routinely, programmatically obtained at hospital admission and a research model for which all predefined candidate predictors were considered for inclusion. We used internal-external cross-validation to evaluate model performance across countries within the development cohort (ie, data from all countries except Malawi participants in AMBITION-cm), before validation of discrimination, calibration, and net benefit in held-out data from Malawi. FINDINGS We included 674 eligible participants from ACTA and 814 from AMBITION-cm in the pooled analysis (total sample size 1488). 1263 participants were included in model development, with 225 from the Malawi site in AMBITION-cm held out for validation. 222 (17·6%) of 1263 participants in the development set and 21 (9·3%) of 225 participants in the validation set met the primary model outcome of 2-week mortality. We retained five predictors in the basic model and seven in the research model. Predictors in both models were Glasgow Coma Scale score, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, haemoglobin, blood neutrophil count, and treatment. Additional predictors in the research model were cerebrospinal fluid opening pressure and log10 cerebrospinal fluid quantitative cryptococcal culture. Discrimination was relatively consistent between study sites for both models (pooled C statistic 0·75 [95% CI 0·68-0·82] for the basic model and 0·78 [0·75-0·82] for the research model), but calibration was more heterogeneous (pooled calibration slope 0·87 [95% CI 0·57 to 1·17] and 0·83 [0·69 to 0·97], pooled calibration in the large 0·00 [-0·54 to 0·55] and -0·02 [-0·46 to 0·42], for the basic and research models, respectively). In held-out validation, discrimination of both models was slightly higher than estimates from internal-external cross-validation (C statistic 0·78 [95% CI 0·70-0·87] in the basic model and 0·85 [0·79-0·92] in the research model). Calibration assessment suggested overestimation of risk, particularly in the high-risk range: calibration slope 1·04 (95% CI 0·54 to 1·55), calibration in the large -0·55 (-1·02 to -0·07). When comparing single, high-dose liposomal amphotericin B plus 14 days of flucytosine plus fluconazole with 1 week of amphotericin B plus flucytosine in AMBITION-cm, hazard ratios were 0·50 (95% CI 0·26-0·97) in the low-risk stratum and 0·96 (0·67-1·37) in the high-risk stratum for the basic model, and 0·61 (0·31-1·18) in the low-risk stratum and 1·03 (0·72-1·47) in the high-risk stratum for the research model. INTERPRETATION Both models accurately predicted 2-week mortality in people with HIV and have the potential to be incorporated into future treatment-stratification approaches in low-income and middle-income countries. FUNDING National Institute for Health Research.
用于指导撒哈拉以南非洲隐球菌脑膜炎死亡率分层的个性化风险预测工具:一项基于两项随机对照试验的汇总分析的预后建模研究。
背景:隐球菌性脑膜炎是全球艾滋病毒相关死亡率的主要驱动因素,经过验证的死亡率风险分层方法有助于制定有效的治疗策略。我们旨在开发和验证模型,以预测撒哈拉以南非洲国家hiv相关隐球菌脑膜炎患者的全因死亡率风险。方法在这项预测建模研究中,我们汇集了ACTA (ISRCTN45035509)和AMBITION-cm (ISRCTN72509687)随机对照试验的个体水平数据。ACTA中的数据收集于2013年2月12日至2017年1月10日,AMBITION-cm中的数据收集于2018年1月31日至2021年6月11日。两项试验均招募了首次发生hiv相关隐球菌性脑膜炎的18岁或以上成年人。排除标准包括妊娠或哺乳期;筛选前接受高剂量抗真菌治疗剂量;以及试验用药的禁忌症。ACTA计划从喀麦隆、马拉维、坦桑尼亚和赞比亚的9家医院招募参与者,AMBITION-cm计划从博茨瓦纳、马拉维、南非、乌干达和津巴布韦的8家医院招募参与者。我们为2周死亡率的主要转归建立了两个主要的多变量逻辑回归模型:一个基本模型用于资源有限的环境,仅包含常规的、在住院时通过程序获得的候选预测因子;另一个研究模型考虑了所有预定义的候选预测因子。我们使用内部-外部交叉验证来评估发展队列中各国的模型性能(即,来自所有国家的数据,除了马拉维参与AMBITION-cm的所有国家的数据),然后验证来自马拉维的保留数据的歧视、校准和净效益。结果:我们纳入了来自ACTA的674名符合条件的受试者和来自AMBITION-cm的814名符合条件的受试者(总样本量为1488)。1263名参与者参与了模型开发,其中有225名来自AMBITION-cm的马拉维站点进行验证。1263名开发组参与者中222名(17.6%)和225名验证组参与者中21名(9.3%)符合2周死亡率的主要模型结局。我们在基本模型中保留了五个预测因子,在研究模型中保留了七个预测因子。两种模型的预测因子均为格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分、东部肿瘤合作组表现状态、血红蛋白、血液中性粒细胞计数和治疗。研究模型中的其他预测因子是脑脊液开放压力和log10脑脊液定量隐球菌培养。两种模型的研究点之间的区分相对一致(基本模型的汇总C统计量为0.75 [95% CI 0.68 - 0.82],研究模型的汇总C统计量为0.78[0.75 - 0.82]),但校准的异质性更大(汇总校准斜率为0.87 [95% CI 0.57 - 1.17]和0.83[0.69 - 0.97],基本模型和研究模型的汇总校准分别为0.00[- 0.54 - 0.55]和- 0.02[- 0.46 - 0.42])。在保留验证中,两种模型的判别率略高于内外交叉验证的估计(基本模型的C统计量为0.78 [95% CI为0.70 - 0.87],研究模型的C统计量为0.85[0.79 - 0.92])。校准评估建议高估风险,特别是在高风险范围:校准斜率为1.04 (95% CI为0.54至1.55),校准斜率为- 0.55(- 1.02至- 0.07)。将单次高剂量两性霉素B脂质体加14天氟胞嘧啶加氟康唑与两性霉素B加氟胞嘧啶1周进行ambion -cm比较,基础模型低危层的风险比为0.50 (95% CI为0.26 - 0.97),高危层的风险比为0.96 (95% CI为0.67 - 1.37),研究模型低危层的风险比为0.61(0.31 - 1.18),高危层的风险比为1.03(0.72 - 1.47)。这两种模型都能准确预测艾滋病毒感染者的2周死亡率,并有可能被纳入低收入和中等收入国家未来的治疗分层方法。美国国家健康研究所
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Lancet Global Health
Lancet Global Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
44.10
自引率
1.20%
发文量
763
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: The Lancet Global Health is an online publication that releases monthly open access (subscription-free) issues.Each issue includes original research, commentary, and correspondence.In addition to this, the publication also provides regular blog posts. The main focus of The Lancet Global Health is on disadvantaged populations, which can include both entire economic regions and marginalized groups within prosperous nations.The publication prefers to cover topics related to reproductive, maternal, neonatal, child, and adolescent health; infectious diseases (including neglected tropical diseases); non-communicable diseases; mental health; the global health workforce; health systems; surgery; and health policy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信