Cecilie Velsoe Maeng, Sæmundur Rögnvaldsson, Thórir Einarsson Long, Christian Brieghel, Emil Hermansen, Carsten Utoft Niemann, Kirsten Grønbæk, Sigurður Yngvi Kristinsson, Sigrún Thorsteinsdóttir
{"title":"Revised free light chain reference intervals enhance risk stratification in monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance and reduce overdiagnosis","authors":"Cecilie Velsoe Maeng, Sæmundur Rögnvaldsson, Thórir Einarsson Long, Christian Brieghel, Emil Hermansen, Carsten Utoft Niemann, Kirsten Grønbæk, Sigurður Yngvi Kristinsson, Sigrún Thorsteinsdóttir","doi":"10.1038/s41408-025-01289-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The free light chain (FLC) ratio is a critical part of risk stratification for monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS). Recently, revised FLC reference intervals developed using the iStopMM cohort, accounting for age and renal function, have reduced the rate of abnormal findings. Here, we examine the implications of the revision in an independent Danish MGUS cohort. Of 6993 MGUS individuals, 2641 had an abnormal FLC ratio by the original intervals, of whom 844 (32%) were reclassified as normal using the revised intervals. Reclassified individuals had no significantly increased risk of progression compared to those with a normal FLC ratio (hazard ratio (HR): 1.07, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.74–1.57). Those with an abnormal FLC ratio by the revised reference intervals had an increased risk of progression (HR 2.23, 95% CI 1.79–2.78). Using the revised reference intervals, 490 individuals (16%) were reclassified to low-risk from a higher risk group. These individuals had a similar progression risk compared to others in the low-risk group. The findings validate the revised FLC reference intervals, enhancing prognostic accuracy and improving risk stratification to accurately identify MGUS individuals at risk of progression while reducing unnecessary classifications as high-risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":8989,"journal":{"name":"Blood Cancer Journal","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":12.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Blood Cancer Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41408-025-01289-7","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The free light chain (FLC) ratio is a critical part of risk stratification for monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS). Recently, revised FLC reference intervals developed using the iStopMM cohort, accounting for age and renal function, have reduced the rate of abnormal findings. Here, we examine the implications of the revision in an independent Danish MGUS cohort. Of 6993 MGUS individuals, 2641 had an abnormal FLC ratio by the original intervals, of whom 844 (32%) were reclassified as normal using the revised intervals. Reclassified individuals had no significantly increased risk of progression compared to those with a normal FLC ratio (hazard ratio (HR): 1.07, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.74–1.57). Those with an abnormal FLC ratio by the revised reference intervals had an increased risk of progression (HR 2.23, 95% CI 1.79–2.78). Using the revised reference intervals, 490 individuals (16%) were reclassified to low-risk from a higher risk group. These individuals had a similar progression risk compared to others in the low-risk group. The findings validate the revised FLC reference intervals, enhancing prognostic accuracy and improving risk stratification to accurately identify MGUS individuals at risk of progression while reducing unnecessary classifications as high-risk.
期刊介绍:
Blood Cancer Journal is dedicated to publishing high-quality articles related to hematologic malignancies and related disorders. The journal welcomes submissions of original research, reviews, guidelines, and letters that are deemed to have a significant impact in the field. While the journal covers a wide range of topics, it particularly focuses on areas such as:
Preclinical studies of new compounds, especially those that provide mechanistic insights
Clinical trials and observations
Reviews related to new drugs and current management of hematologic malignancies
Novel observations related to new mutations, molecular pathways, and tumor genomics
Blood Cancer Journal offers a forum for expedited publication of novel observations regarding new mutations or altered pathways.