Do Neurologists Need a Goldwater Rule?

IF 20.4 1区医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY

JAMA neurology Pub Date : 2025-04-28 DOI:10.1001/jamaneurol.2025.0642

Farrah J. Mateen

引用次数: 0

Abstract

This Viewpoint examines whether neurologists, like psychiatrists, should adopt a Goldwater Rule, an ethical principle prohibiting comments about and diagnoses of public persons they have not personally examined.

查看原文本刊更多论文

神经科医生需要金水法则吗？

本观点探讨神经科医生是否应该像精神科医生一样采用戈德华特规则，这是一种道德原则，禁止对他们没有亲自检查过的公众人物发表评论和诊断。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

JAMA neurology CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-

CiteScore

41.90

自引率

1.70%

发文量

250

期刊介绍： JAMA Neurology is an international peer-reviewed journal for physicians caring for people with neurologic disorders and those interested in the structure and function of the normal and diseased nervous system. The Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry began publication in 1919 and, in 1959, became 2 separate journals: Archives of Neurology and Archives of General Psychiatry. In 2013, their names changed to JAMA Neurology and JAMA Psychiatry, respectively. JAMA Neurology is a member of the JAMA Network, a consortium of peer-reviewed, general medical and specialty publications.