A blended approach: How to integrate coaching, mentoring, and advising as a medical educator

IF 1.7 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Simanjit K. Mand MD, Sally A. Santen MD, PhD, Robin R. Hemphill MD, MPH, Benjamin H. Schnapp MD, MEd, Susan B. Promes MD, MBA, Jazmyn Shaw MD, Al’ai Alvarez MD, Stephen J. Cico MD, MEd, Sarah R. Williams MD, MHPE, PCC
{"title":"A blended approach: How to integrate coaching, mentoring, and advising as a medical educator","authors":"Simanjit K. Mand MD,&nbsp;Sally A. Santen MD, PhD,&nbsp;Robin R. Hemphill MD, MPH,&nbsp;Benjamin H. Schnapp MD, MEd,&nbsp;Susan B. Promes MD, MBA,&nbsp;Jazmyn Shaw MD,&nbsp;Al’ai Alvarez MD,&nbsp;Stephen J. Cico MD, MEd,&nbsp;Sarah R. Williams MD, MHPE, PCC","doi":"10.1002/aet2.70014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Medical education faculty often take on the responsibility of helping their learners through professional or personal obstacles to achieve individual success. This can be challenging to navigate given the multiple “hats” that an individual faculty educator may wear, including coach, mentor, and advisor. Medical educators may feel uncertain as to which role may be most effective in any given interaction with a learner. Considering each as a communication strategy with unique skill sets and relational principles, rather than as a rigid role, can allow an educator more flexibility to use each approach in learner interactions. The authors discuss the separate modes of the coaching, mentoring, and advising approaches; the critical differences in relational and behavioral skills used; the potential pitfalls with each approach; and how feedback may fit into this framework. Once each approach is mastered, a medical educator may find it most effective to use a blended approach, weaving all three together intentionally, calling on each skill set as the need arises to support the learner.</p>","PeriodicalId":37032,"journal":{"name":"AEM Education and Training","volume":"9 S1","pages":"S24-S28"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/aet2.70014","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AEM Education and Training","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/aet2.70014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Medical education faculty often take on the responsibility of helping their learners through professional or personal obstacles to achieve individual success. This can be challenging to navigate given the multiple “hats” that an individual faculty educator may wear, including coach, mentor, and advisor. Medical educators may feel uncertain as to which role may be most effective in any given interaction with a learner. Considering each as a communication strategy with unique skill sets and relational principles, rather than as a rigid role, can allow an educator more flexibility to use each approach in learner interactions. The authors discuss the separate modes of the coaching, mentoring, and advising approaches; the critical differences in relational and behavioral skills used; the potential pitfalls with each approach; and how feedback may fit into this framework. Once each approach is mastered, a medical educator may find it most effective to use a blended approach, weaving all three together intentionally, calling on each skill set as the need arises to support the learner.

Abstract Image

混合方法:作为医学教育者如何整合指导、指导和建议
医学教育教师经常承担帮助他们的学习者克服专业或个人障碍以实现个人成功的责任。考虑到每个教师教育者可能身披多重“帽子”,包括教练、导师和顾问,这可能是一项挑战。医学教育者可能不确定在任何给定的与学习者的互动中哪种角色可能最有效。将每种方法视为具有独特技能集和关系原则的沟通策略,而不是作为一个僵化的角色,可以让教育者在学习者互动中更灵活地使用每种方法。作者讨论了辅导、指导和建议方法的不同模式;关系技能和行为技能的关键差异;每种方法的潜在缺陷;以及反馈如何适应这个框架。一旦掌握了每一种方法,医学教育者可能会发现使用混合方法是最有效的,有意地将这三种方法编织在一起,在需要时调用每种技能集来支持学习者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
AEM Education and Training
AEM Education and Training Nursing-Emergency Nursing
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
22.20%
发文量
89
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信