Balancing the Risk of Cardiotoxicity Outcomes in Treatment Selection for Multiple Myeloma: A Retrospective Multicenter Evaluation of Ixazomib, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone (IRd) Versus Carfilzomib, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone (KRd)
Benjamin J. Lee, Michael Sayer, Ali A. Naqvi, Karen T. Mai, Pranav M. Patel, Lisa X. Lee, Aya F. Ozaki
{"title":"Balancing the Risk of Cardiotoxicity Outcomes in Treatment Selection for Multiple Myeloma: A Retrospective Multicenter Evaluation of Ixazomib, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone (IRd) Versus Carfilzomib, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone (KRd)","authors":"Benjamin J. Lee, Michael Sayer, Ali A. Naqvi, Karen T. Mai, Pranav M. Patel, Lisa X. Lee, Aya F. Ozaki","doi":"10.1002/jha2.70038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Carfilzomib use has been extensively associated with cardiovascular toxicity; the risk with ixazomib, a novel oral proteasome inhibitor, is underreported and no large comparative analysis is available.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We conducted a retrospective cohort study utilizing the TriNetX platform to compare toxicity outcomes among multiple myeloma patients who received lenalidomide, dexamethasone, and ixazomib (IRd) or carfilzomib (KRd).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>After propensity-score-matching 478 patients from each cohort, the onset of new heart failure (HR 0.25; <i>p </i>< 0.001) and arrhythmias (HR 0.57; <i>p</i> = 0.014) at 6 months were significantly lower with IRd while overall survival at 3 years was similar (<i>p</i> = 0.50).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>IRd is associated with a significantly lower risk of cardiac toxicities compared to KRd.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":72883,"journal":{"name":"EJHaem","volume":"6 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jha2.70038","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EJHaem","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jha2.70038","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction
Carfilzomib use has been extensively associated with cardiovascular toxicity; the risk with ixazomib, a novel oral proteasome inhibitor, is underreported and no large comparative analysis is available.
Methods
We conducted a retrospective cohort study utilizing the TriNetX platform to compare toxicity outcomes among multiple myeloma patients who received lenalidomide, dexamethasone, and ixazomib (IRd) or carfilzomib (KRd).
Results
After propensity-score-matching 478 patients from each cohort, the onset of new heart failure (HR 0.25; p < 0.001) and arrhythmias (HR 0.57; p = 0.014) at 6 months were significantly lower with IRd while overall survival at 3 years was similar (p = 0.50).
Conclusion
IRd is associated with a significantly lower risk of cardiac toxicities compared to KRd.