American and Chinese parents’ math talk during numeracy and routine activities: Do parental beliefs matter?

IF 3.2 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Qianru Tiffany Yang, Iris Jeffries, Ziqin Xie, Jon R. Star, Paul L. Harris, Meredith L. Rowe
{"title":"American and Chinese parents’ math talk during numeracy and routine activities: Do parental beliefs matter?","authors":"Qianru Tiffany Yang,&nbsp;Iris Jeffries,&nbsp;Ziqin Xie,&nbsp;Jon R. Star,&nbsp;Paul L. Harris,&nbsp;Meredith L. Rowe","doi":"10.1016/j.ecresq.2025.04.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Parents vary in their math talk during parent-child interactions, and this variation is related to children's early mathematics skills. To understand the sources of individual variability in parental math talk, the present study investigated the associations between parents’ math beliefs and math talk when engaging their children in number book reading and pretend play. Further, this study compared parents in two cultural contexts to establish commonalities and differences. Participants included 50 American (27 girls) and 44 Chinese (23 girls) families of 4-year-old children, with participating parents predominantly being mothers. We assessed parents’ child-specific math expectations and their math attitudes. Parental math talk, including types (e.g., cardinality, arithmetic) and forms (i.e., prompt vs. statement) of math talk, were analyzed. Across activities, Chinese parents consistently engaged in more cardinality statements than American parents. However, aside from these differences in cardinality statements, the results indicated considerable cultural commonalities in parents’ math expectations and attitudes, as well as in the quantity and features of their math talk across both number book reading and pretend play. In both cultures, parents’ math beliefs were associated with the frequency of their arithmetic statements but not with other features of math talk during book reading. Moreover, no significant connections were found between parents’ math beliefs and math talk during pretend play in either culture. Implications for understanding parental math involvement in various cultural and activity contexts are discussed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48348,"journal":{"name":"Early Childhood Research Quarterly","volume":"72 ","pages":"Pages 284-294"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Early Childhood Research Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0885200625000353","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Parents vary in their math talk during parent-child interactions, and this variation is related to children's early mathematics skills. To understand the sources of individual variability in parental math talk, the present study investigated the associations between parents’ math beliefs and math talk when engaging their children in number book reading and pretend play. Further, this study compared parents in two cultural contexts to establish commonalities and differences. Participants included 50 American (27 girls) and 44 Chinese (23 girls) families of 4-year-old children, with participating parents predominantly being mothers. We assessed parents’ child-specific math expectations and their math attitudes. Parental math talk, including types (e.g., cardinality, arithmetic) and forms (i.e., prompt vs. statement) of math talk, were analyzed. Across activities, Chinese parents consistently engaged in more cardinality statements than American parents. However, aside from these differences in cardinality statements, the results indicated considerable cultural commonalities in parents’ math expectations and attitudes, as well as in the quantity and features of their math talk across both number book reading and pretend play. In both cultures, parents’ math beliefs were associated with the frequency of their arithmetic statements but not with other features of math talk during book reading. Moreover, no significant connections were found between parents’ math beliefs and math talk during pretend play in either culture. Implications for understanding parental math involvement in various cultural and activity contexts are discussed.
美国和中国父母在数学和日常活动中的数学谈话:父母的信仰重要吗?
在亲子互动中,父母在数学话题上的差异与儿童早期的数学技能有关。为了了解父母数学谈话的个体差异的来源,本研究调查了父母在让孩子阅读数字书和假装游戏时的数学信仰与数学谈话之间的联系。此外,本研究比较了两种文化背景下的父母,以确定共同点和差异。参与者包括50个美国(27个女孩)和44个中国(23个女孩)的4岁儿童家庭,参与的父母主要是母亲。我们评估了家长对孩子的数学期望和他们对数学的态度。分析了父母的数学谈话,包括数学谈话的类型(如基数、算术)和形式(如提示与陈述)。在各种活动中,中国父母总是比美国父母使用更多的基数语句。然而,除了在基数陈述上的这些差异外,研究结果还表明,在父母对数学的期望和态度上,以及他们在数字书阅读和假装游戏中谈论数学的数量和特征上,存在相当大的文化共性。在这两种文化中,父母的数学信念与他们的算术陈述的频率有关,但与读书时数学谈话的其他特征无关。此外,在两种文化中,父母的数学信念与假装游戏中的数学谈话之间没有明显的联系。讨论了在不同文化和活动背景下理解父母数学参与的含义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
8.10%
发文量
109
期刊介绍: For over twenty years, Early Childhood Research Quarterly (ECRQ) has influenced the field of early childhood education and development through the publication of empirical research that meets the highest standards of scholarly and practical significance. ECRQ publishes predominantly empirical research (quantitative or qualitative methods) on issues of interest to early childhood development, theory, and educational practice (Birth through 8 years of age). The journal also occasionally publishes practitioner and/or policy perspectives, book reviews, and significant reviews of research. As an applied journal, we are interested in work that has social, policy, and educational relevance and implications and work that strengthens links between research and practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信