The use of a matched controls design and publicly available outcome data to evaluate a multiyear urban school-based SEL intervention

Angela W. Wang , Simon Daniel , Maurice J. Elias
{"title":"The use of a matched controls design and publicly available outcome data to evaluate a multiyear urban school-based SEL intervention","authors":"Angela W. Wang ,&nbsp;Simon Daniel ,&nbsp;Maurice J. Elias","doi":"10.1016/j.sel.2025.100111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study evaluated the effects of the <em>Mastering Our Skills and Inspiring Character</em> (MOSAIC) intervention on school-wide student outcomes for urban middle school students. Specifically, it investigated the extent to which schools implementing the MOSAIC intervention (<em>n</em> = 6) show greater progress on key state-collected academic (e.g., English Language Arts, Mathematics) and behavioral (e.g., absenteeism, behavior referrals) outcome variables, compared to matched schools not hosting MOSAIC (<em>n</em> = 30). Data were collected from publicly available school performance reports across multiple time points, including baseline, early implementation, and full implementation. These indicators were assessed annually, with academic assessments administered in the spring and behavioral metrics aggregated for the full academic year. This study utilizes the overlapping matched control group design, an innovative evaluation approach that involves fewer schools than most randomized control trials and relies on measurements routinely collected by schools, so as to provide feasible adoption of this approach by local schools and districts. Additionally, this study adds to the emerging literature on the impact of longitudinal SEL-related interventions on behavioral and academic trajectories in the middle grades with predominantly urban, minoritized youth, to inform educational policy. Our findings indicate mixed results across academic and behavioral indicators, such as significant improvement in Math scores but smaller effects for behavioral metrics, such as substance use. The results highlight the challenges and potential value of the matched control approach and the importance of monitoring multiple domains to fully understand intervention impacts.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":101165,"journal":{"name":"Social and Emotional Learning: Research, Practice, and Policy","volume":"5 ","pages":"Article 100111"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social and Emotional Learning: Research, Practice, and Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S277323392500035X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study evaluated the effects of the Mastering Our Skills and Inspiring Character (MOSAIC) intervention on school-wide student outcomes for urban middle school students. Specifically, it investigated the extent to which schools implementing the MOSAIC intervention (n = 6) show greater progress on key state-collected academic (e.g., English Language Arts, Mathematics) and behavioral (e.g., absenteeism, behavior referrals) outcome variables, compared to matched schools not hosting MOSAIC (n = 30). Data were collected from publicly available school performance reports across multiple time points, including baseline, early implementation, and full implementation. These indicators were assessed annually, with academic assessments administered in the spring and behavioral metrics aggregated for the full academic year. This study utilizes the overlapping matched control group design, an innovative evaluation approach that involves fewer schools than most randomized control trials and relies on measurements routinely collected by schools, so as to provide feasible adoption of this approach by local schools and districts. Additionally, this study adds to the emerging literature on the impact of longitudinal SEL-related interventions on behavioral and academic trajectories in the middle grades with predominantly urban, minoritized youth, to inform educational policy. Our findings indicate mixed results across academic and behavioral indicators, such as significant improvement in Math scores but smaller effects for behavioral metrics, such as substance use. The results highlight the challenges and potential value of the matched control approach and the importance of monitoring multiple domains to fully understand intervention impacts.
使用匹配对照设计和公开可用的结果数据来评估多年城市学校为基础的SEL干预
本研究旨在评估掌握技能与激励品格(MOSAIC)干预对城市中学生学业成绩的影响。具体来说,它调查了实施MOSAIC干预的学校(n = 6)与未实施MOSAIC的匹配学校(n = 30)相比,在国家收集的关键学术(如英语语言艺术,数学)和行为(如缺勤,行为转院)结果变量上取得更大进步的程度。数据是从多个时间点的公开学校绩效报告中收集的,包括基线、早期实施和全面实施。这些指标每年进行一次评估,在春季进行学术评估,在整个学年汇总行为指标。本研究采用重叠匹配对照组设计,这是一种创新的评估方法,比大多数随机对照试验涉及的学校少,依赖于学校常规收集的测量数据,为当地学校和学区提供可行的采用方法。此外,本研究补充了新兴文献关于纵向sel相关干预对以城市少数族裔青年为主的中年级学生的行为和学业轨迹的影响,为教育政策提供信息。我们的研究结果表明,学术和行为指标的结果好坏参半,比如数学成绩有显著提高,但行为指标(比如物质使用)的影响较小。结果强调了匹配控制方法的挑战和潜在价值,以及监测多个领域以充分了解干预影响的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信