Maximizing math achievement: Strategies from the science of learning

IF 1.8 2区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL
Nicole R. Scalise , Jessica R. Gladstone , Dana Miller-Cotto
{"title":"Maximizing math achievement: Strategies from the science of learning","authors":"Nicole R. Scalise ,&nbsp;Jessica R. Gladstone ,&nbsp;Dana Miller-Cotto","doi":"10.1016/j.jecp.2025.106281","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>To best support students’ mathematical learning, it is critical to identify instructional strategies that predict achievement over time and consider how these strategies interact with individual child factors. Prior research suggests that strategies informed by the principles of the science of learning benefit children’s mathematical development in early childhood. The present study extends previous findings to middle childhood, examining the relations between children’s exposure to mathematics instruction informed by the science of learning principles, children’s mathematics interest, and their mathematics achievement at the end of fourth grade. Participants were 4520 children from the Early Childhood Longitudinal Study − Kindergarten 2010–2011 (<em>M</em> = 10.1 years; 50 % female). Children who received more frequent mathematics instruction aligned with principles of the science of learning had higher mathematics achievement at the end of fourth grade, controlling for prior mathematics achievement, overall frequency of mathematics instruction, child age, sex, and socioeconomic status. Although we hypothesized that children’s individual mathematics interest would moderate the association between the frequency of high-quality mathematics instruction and mathematics achievement, our results did not find evidence that children’s initial mathematics interest affected the association between their exposure to science of learning aligned strategies and their end-of-year mathematics achievement.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48391,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Child Psychology","volume":"257 ","pages":"Article 106281"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Child Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022096525000876","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To best support students’ mathematical learning, it is critical to identify instructional strategies that predict achievement over time and consider how these strategies interact with individual child factors. Prior research suggests that strategies informed by the principles of the science of learning benefit children’s mathematical development in early childhood. The present study extends previous findings to middle childhood, examining the relations between children’s exposure to mathematics instruction informed by the science of learning principles, children’s mathematics interest, and their mathematics achievement at the end of fourth grade. Participants were 4520 children from the Early Childhood Longitudinal Study − Kindergarten 2010–2011 (M = 10.1 years; 50 % female). Children who received more frequent mathematics instruction aligned with principles of the science of learning had higher mathematics achievement at the end of fourth grade, controlling for prior mathematics achievement, overall frequency of mathematics instruction, child age, sex, and socioeconomic status. Although we hypothesized that children’s individual mathematics interest would moderate the association between the frequency of high-quality mathematics instruction and mathematics achievement, our results did not find evidence that children’s initial mathematics interest affected the association between their exposure to science of learning aligned strategies and their end-of-year mathematics achievement.
最大化数学成就:来自学习科学的策略
为了最好地支持学生的数学学习,关键是要确定预测成绩的教学策略,并考虑这些策略如何与儿童个体因素相互作用。先前的研究表明,基于学习科学原理的策略有利于儿童早期的数学发展。本研究将以往的研究结果扩展到儿童中期,考察了儿童接触学习原理科学的数学教学、儿童的数学兴趣和他们四年级末的数学成绩之间的关系。参与者为来自2010-2011年幼儿纵向研究-幼儿园的4520名儿童(M = 10.1岁;女性占50%)。在控制了先前的数学成绩、总体数学教学频率、儿童年龄、性别和社会经济地位的影响下,接受更频繁的符合学习科学原则的数学教学的儿童在四年级结束时的数学成绩更高。虽然我们假设儿童的个人数学兴趣会调节高质量数学教学频率与数学成绩之间的关联,但我们的研究结果没有发现证据表明儿童最初的数学兴趣会影响他们接触学习策略科学与他们年终数学成绩之间的关联。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
190
期刊介绍: The Journal of Experimental Child Psychology is an excellent source of information concerning all aspects of the development of children. It includes empirical psychological research on cognitive, social/emotional, and physical development. In addition, the journal periodically publishes Special Topic issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信