Bayesian-optimized recursive machine learning for predicting human-induced changes in suspended sediment transport

IF 2.9 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Soumya Kundu, Somil Swarnkar, Akshay Agarwal
{"title":"Bayesian-optimized recursive machine learning for predicting human-induced changes in suspended sediment transport","authors":"Soumya Kundu,&nbsp;Somil Swarnkar,&nbsp;Akshay Agarwal","doi":"10.1007/s10661-025-14039-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The suspended sediment load (<i>SSL</i>) of a river is a key indicator of water resource management, river morphology, and ecosystem health. This study analyzes historical changes in <i>SSL</i> and evaluates machine learning (ML) models for <i>SSL</i> prediction in the Godavari River Basin. The dataset was divided into pre-1990 (1969–1990) and post-1990 (1990–2020) periods, revealing a significant decline in mean annual <i>SSL</i> from 136.85 to 62.38 million tons post-1990 due to anthropogenic influences such as dam construction and land-use/land-cover (LULC) changes. Despite a consistent seasonal distribution (~ 73% <i>SSL</i> contribution from monsoon months in both periods), there was a notable decline in median and peak <i>SSL</i> values, along with a narrowing interquartile range, indicating reduced sediment availability. The empirical cumulative distribution function (ECDF) further revealed shifts in sediment transport, with post-1990 <i>SSL</i> values surpassing pre-1990 levels at higher cumulative probabilities, suggesting altered sediment retention and release patterns. To improve <i>SSL</i> prediction, tree-based ML models were developed and evaluated using <i>R</i><sup>2</sup>, <i>RMSE</i>, and <i>MAE</i> metrics. Among them, the extra trees regressor (ETR) demonstrated the highest predictive accuracy (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.97 in training, 0.9 in testing) with the lowest errors, while the random forest regressor (RFR) and gradient boosting regressor (GBR) provided competitive results. The findings highlight the impact of human modifications on sediment transport and emphasize that ensemble tree-based models offer a robust solution for <i>SSL</i> prediction. This study provides valuable insights for river basin management and sustainable sediment transport modeling under changing hydrological conditions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":544,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Monitoring and Assessment","volume":"197 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Monitoring and Assessment","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10661-025-14039-w","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The suspended sediment load (SSL) of a river is a key indicator of water resource management, river morphology, and ecosystem health. This study analyzes historical changes in SSL and evaluates machine learning (ML) models for SSL prediction in the Godavari River Basin. The dataset was divided into pre-1990 (1969–1990) and post-1990 (1990–2020) periods, revealing a significant decline in mean annual SSL from 136.85 to 62.38 million tons post-1990 due to anthropogenic influences such as dam construction and land-use/land-cover (LULC) changes. Despite a consistent seasonal distribution (~ 73% SSL contribution from monsoon months in both periods), there was a notable decline in median and peak SSL values, along with a narrowing interquartile range, indicating reduced sediment availability. The empirical cumulative distribution function (ECDF) further revealed shifts in sediment transport, with post-1990 SSL values surpassing pre-1990 levels at higher cumulative probabilities, suggesting altered sediment retention and release patterns. To improve SSL prediction, tree-based ML models were developed and evaluated using R2, RMSE, and MAE metrics. Among them, the extra trees regressor (ETR) demonstrated the highest predictive accuracy (R2 = 0.97 in training, 0.9 in testing) with the lowest errors, while the random forest regressor (RFR) and gradient boosting regressor (GBR) provided competitive results. The findings highlight the impact of human modifications on sediment transport and emphasize that ensemble tree-based models offer a robust solution for SSL prediction. This study provides valuable insights for river basin management and sustainable sediment transport modeling under changing hydrological conditions.

贝叶斯优化递归机器学习预测人类引起的悬浮泥沙运输变化
河流悬沙负荷是水资源管理、河流形态和生态系统健康的重要指标。本研究分析了戈达瓦里河流域SSL的历史变化,并评估了用于SSL预测的机器学习(ML)模型。数据集分为1990年之前(1969-1990)和1990年之后(1990-2020)两个时期,发现1990年之后,由于水坝建设和土地利用/土地覆盖(LULC)变化等人为影响,年平均SSL从13685万吨显著下降至6238万吨。尽管具有一致的季节分布(两个时期季风月的SSL贡献约为73%),但SSL的中位数和峰值值显著下降,四分位数范围缩小,表明沉积物可利用性减少。经验累积分布函数(ECDF)进一步揭示了沉积物输运的变化,1990年后的SSL值以更高的累积概率超过1990年前的水平,表明泥沙保留和释放模式发生了变化。为了改进SSL预测,开发了基于树的ML模型,并使用R2、RMSE和MAE指标进行了评估。其中,额外树回归器(ETR)的预测精度最高(训练R2 = 0.97,测试R2 = 0.9),误差最低,随机森林回归器(RFR)和梯度增强回归器(GBR)具有竞争力。这些发现强调了人类活动对沉积物迁移的影响,并强调了基于集合树的模型为SSL预测提供了一个可靠的解决方案。该研究为变化水文条件下的流域管理和可持续输沙模型提供了有价值的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
6.70%
发文量
1000
审稿时长
7.3 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Monitoring and Assessment emphasizes technical developments and data arising from environmental monitoring and assessment, the use of scientific principles in the design of monitoring systems at the local, regional and global scales, and the use of monitoring data in assessing the consequences of natural resource management actions and pollution risks to man and the environment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信