{"title":"Nurses' Perceptions of Their Involvement in Shared Decision‐Making for Advanced Cancer Treatment and Palliative Care; a Qualitative Interview Study","authors":"Jannicke Rabben, Mariann Fossum, Bella Vivat, Gudrun Elin Rohde","doi":"10.1111/jan.16994","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AimTo explore nurses' perceptions of their involvement in shared decision‐making for advanced cancer treatment and palliative care, and their contributions to patient involvement.DesignExploratory qualitative research.MethodsIn‐depth interviews conducted in March–October 2023 with 15 nurses from two Norwegian hospitals were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.ResultsTwo broad themes were constructed: Theme (1) ‘Person‐centredness; acquiring and sharing knowledge’; with subthemes; ‘Knowing and speaking for the person with cancer’, and ‘Providing informational, emotional and practical facilitation and support’, and Theme (2) Enacting the professional nurse role in complex situations'; with subthemes: ‘Palliative cancer care decision‐making is particularly complex’, ‘Systems and cultures shape nurses’ roles and contributions', and ‘Balancing beneficence and patient autonomy’.ConclusionParticipants perceived themselves as contributing to shared decision‐making, while facing challenges and dilemmas in their professional roles. More supportive interprofessional working might improve how health professionals involve patients in shared decision‐making.Implications for the Profession and Patient CareIncreased development of nurses' contributions to shared decision‐making about advanced cancer and palliative care could support their facilitation of patient involvement.ImpactAlthough nurses can support people receiving palliative cancer treatment and care in shared decision‐making, nursing's particular role and contribution has been unclear. Study findings suggest that nurses' important person‐centred approach is challenging to maintain in treatment decision‐making. These insights into nurses' involvement in shared decision‐making could inform and contribute to the further development of interprofessional education, training, and leadership.Reporting MethodCOREQ.What Does This Paper Contribute to the Wider Global Clinical Community?Provides in‐depth knowledge on nurses' perceptions of their contributions to shared decision‐making with patients and caregivers. Supports an increasing focus on nurses' role in facilitating and supporting patient involvement in treatment decision‐making.Patient or Public ContributionA patient and public involvement group participated in study design and conduct.","PeriodicalId":54897,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advanced Nursing","volume":"48 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advanced Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.16994","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
AimTo explore nurses' perceptions of their involvement in shared decision‐making for advanced cancer treatment and palliative care, and their contributions to patient involvement.DesignExploratory qualitative research.MethodsIn‐depth interviews conducted in March–October 2023 with 15 nurses from two Norwegian hospitals were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.ResultsTwo broad themes were constructed: Theme (1) ‘Person‐centredness; acquiring and sharing knowledge’; with subthemes; ‘Knowing and speaking for the person with cancer’, and ‘Providing informational, emotional and practical facilitation and support’, and Theme (2) Enacting the professional nurse role in complex situations'; with subthemes: ‘Palliative cancer care decision‐making is particularly complex’, ‘Systems and cultures shape nurses’ roles and contributions', and ‘Balancing beneficence and patient autonomy’.ConclusionParticipants perceived themselves as contributing to shared decision‐making, while facing challenges and dilemmas in their professional roles. More supportive interprofessional working might improve how health professionals involve patients in shared decision‐making.Implications for the Profession and Patient CareIncreased development of nurses' contributions to shared decision‐making about advanced cancer and palliative care could support their facilitation of patient involvement.ImpactAlthough nurses can support people receiving palliative cancer treatment and care in shared decision‐making, nursing's particular role and contribution has been unclear. Study findings suggest that nurses' important person‐centred approach is challenging to maintain in treatment decision‐making. These insights into nurses' involvement in shared decision‐making could inform and contribute to the further development of interprofessional education, training, and leadership.Reporting MethodCOREQ.What Does This Paper Contribute to the Wider Global Clinical Community?Provides in‐depth knowledge on nurses' perceptions of their contributions to shared decision‐making with patients and caregivers. Supports an increasing focus on nurses' role in facilitating and supporting patient involvement in treatment decision‐making.Patient or Public ContributionA patient and public involvement group participated in study design and conduct.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Advanced Nursing (JAN) contributes to the advancement of evidence-based nursing, midwifery and healthcare by disseminating high quality research and scholarship of contemporary relevance and with potential to advance knowledge for practice, education, management or policy.
All JAN papers are required to have a sound scientific, evidential, theoretical or philosophical base and to be critical, questioning and scholarly in approach. As an international journal, JAN promotes diversity of research and scholarship in terms of culture, paradigm and healthcare context. For JAN’s worldwide readership, authors are expected to make clear the wider international relevance of their work and to demonstrate sensitivity to cultural considerations and differences.