Nurses' Perceptions of Their Involvement in Shared Decision‐Making for Advanced Cancer Treatment and Palliative Care; a Qualitative Interview Study

IF 3.8 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Jannicke Rabben, Mariann Fossum, Bella Vivat, Gudrun Elin Rohde
{"title":"Nurses' Perceptions of Their Involvement in Shared Decision‐Making for Advanced Cancer Treatment and Palliative Care; a Qualitative Interview Study","authors":"Jannicke Rabben, Mariann Fossum, Bella Vivat, Gudrun Elin Rohde","doi":"10.1111/jan.16994","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AimTo explore nurses' perceptions of their involvement in shared decision‐making for advanced cancer treatment and palliative care, and their contributions to patient involvement.DesignExploratory qualitative research.MethodsIn‐depth interviews conducted in March–October 2023 with 15 nurses from two Norwegian hospitals were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.ResultsTwo broad themes were constructed: Theme (1) ‘Person‐centredness; acquiring and sharing knowledge’; with subthemes; ‘Knowing and speaking for the person with cancer’, and ‘Providing informational, emotional and practical facilitation and support’, and Theme (2) Enacting the professional nurse role in complex situations'; with subthemes: ‘Palliative cancer care decision‐making is particularly complex’, ‘Systems and cultures shape nurses’ roles and contributions', and ‘Balancing beneficence and patient autonomy’.ConclusionParticipants perceived themselves as contributing to shared decision‐making, while facing challenges and dilemmas in their professional roles. More supportive interprofessional working might improve how health professionals involve patients in shared decision‐making.Implications for the Profession and Patient CareIncreased development of nurses' contributions to shared decision‐making about advanced cancer and palliative care could support their facilitation of patient involvement.ImpactAlthough nurses can support people receiving palliative cancer treatment and care in shared decision‐making, nursing's particular role and contribution has been unclear. Study findings suggest that nurses' important person‐centred approach is challenging to maintain in treatment decision‐making. These insights into nurses' involvement in shared decision‐making could inform and contribute to the further development of interprofessional education, training, and leadership.Reporting MethodCOREQ.What Does This Paper Contribute to the Wider Global Clinical Community?Provides in‐depth knowledge on nurses' perceptions of their contributions to shared decision‐making with patients and caregivers. Supports an increasing focus on nurses' role in facilitating and supporting patient involvement in treatment decision‐making.Patient or Public ContributionA patient and public involvement group participated in study design and conduct.","PeriodicalId":54897,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advanced Nursing","volume":"48 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advanced Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.16994","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

AimTo explore nurses' perceptions of their involvement in shared decision‐making for advanced cancer treatment and palliative care, and their contributions to patient involvement.DesignExploratory qualitative research.MethodsIn‐depth interviews conducted in March–October 2023 with 15 nurses from two Norwegian hospitals were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.ResultsTwo broad themes were constructed: Theme (1) ‘Person‐centredness; acquiring and sharing knowledge’; with subthemes; ‘Knowing and speaking for the person with cancer’, and ‘Providing informational, emotional and practical facilitation and support’, and Theme (2) Enacting the professional nurse role in complex situations'; with subthemes: ‘Palliative cancer care decision‐making is particularly complex’, ‘Systems and cultures shape nurses’ roles and contributions', and ‘Balancing beneficence and patient autonomy’.ConclusionParticipants perceived themselves as contributing to shared decision‐making, while facing challenges and dilemmas in their professional roles. More supportive interprofessional working might improve how health professionals involve patients in shared decision‐making.Implications for the Profession and Patient CareIncreased development of nurses' contributions to shared decision‐making about advanced cancer and palliative care could support their facilitation of patient involvement.ImpactAlthough nurses can support people receiving palliative cancer treatment and care in shared decision‐making, nursing's particular role and contribution has been unclear. Study findings suggest that nurses' important person‐centred approach is challenging to maintain in treatment decision‐making. These insights into nurses' involvement in shared decision‐making could inform and contribute to the further development of interprofessional education, training, and leadership.Reporting MethodCOREQ.What Does This Paper Contribute to the Wider Global Clinical Community?Provides in‐depth knowledge on nurses' perceptions of their contributions to shared decision‐making with patients and caregivers. Supports an increasing focus on nurses' role in facilitating and supporting patient involvement in treatment decision‐making.Patient or Public ContributionA patient and public involvement group participated in study design and conduct.
护士参与晚期癌症治疗和姑息治疗共同决策的认知定性访谈研究
目的探讨护士对参与晚期癌症治疗和姑息治疗共同决策的看法,以及他们对患者参与的贡献。设计探索性质的研究。方法于2023年3月至10月对挪威两家医院的15名护士进行深度访谈,采用自反性主题分析进行分析。结果构建了两大主题:主题(1)“以人为本”;获取和分享知识”;subthemes;“了解并为癌症患者说话”,“提供信息,情感和实际的促进和支持”,以及主题(2)在复杂情况下发挥专业护士的作用”;分主题:“姑息性癌症治疗决策特别复杂”,“系统和文化塑造护士的角色和贡献”,以及“平衡慈善和患者自主权”。结论:当参与者在他们的职业角色中面临挑战和困境时,他们认为自己对共同决策做出了贡献。更多的支持性跨专业工作可能会改善卫生专业人员让患者参与共同决策的方式。护士对晚期癌症和姑息治疗共同决策的贡献的增加,可以支持他们促进患者参与。虽然护士可以在共同决策中支持接受姑息性癌症治疗和护理的患者,但护理的特殊作用和贡献尚不清楚。研究结果表明,护士重要的以人为中心的方法是具有挑战性的,以维持治疗决策。这些关于护士参与共同决策的见解可以为跨专业教育、培训和领导力的进一步发展提供信息和贡献。报告MethodCOREQ。这篇论文对更广泛的全球临床社区有什么贡献?提供深入了解护士的看法,他们的贡献与患者和护理人员共同决策。支持越来越关注护士在促进和支持患者参与治疗决策中的作用。患者或公众参与患者和公众参与组参与了研究的设计和实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
7.90%
发文量
369
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Advanced Nursing (JAN) contributes to the advancement of evidence-based nursing, midwifery and healthcare by disseminating high quality research and scholarship of contemporary relevance and with potential to advance knowledge for practice, education, management or policy. All JAN papers are required to have a sound scientific, evidential, theoretical or philosophical base and to be critical, questioning and scholarly in approach. As an international journal, JAN promotes diversity of research and scholarship in terms of culture, paradigm and healthcare context. For JAN’s worldwide readership, authors are expected to make clear the wider international relevance of their work and to demonstrate sensitivity to cultural considerations and differences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信