Sean D. Fraser, Remco V. Klaassen, Carmen Villmann, August B. Smit, Robert J. Harvey
{"title":"Milestone Review: Unlocking the Proteomics of Glycine Receptor Complexes","authors":"Sean D. Fraser, Remco V. Klaassen, Carmen Villmann, August B. Smit, Robert J. Harvey","doi":"10.1111/jnc.70061","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Glycine receptors (GlyRs) are typically known for mediating inhibitory synaptic transmission within the spinal cord and brainstem, but they also have key roles in embryonic brain development, learning/memory, inflammatory pain sensitization, and rhythmic breathing. GlyR dysfunction has been implicated in multiple neurological disease states, including startle disease (GlyR α1β) and neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs) including autism spectrum disorder (ASD), intellectual disability (ID), developmental delay (DD) and epilepsy (GlyR α2). However, GlyRs do not operate in isolation but depend upon stable and transient protein–protein interactions (PPIs) that influence synaptic localization, homeostasis, signaling pathways, and receptor function. Despite the affinity purification of GlyRs using the antagonist strychnine over four decades ago, we still have much to learn about native GlyR stoichiometry and accessory proteins. In contrast to other neurotransmitter receptors, < 20 potential GlyR interactors have been identified to date. These include some well-known proteins that are vital to inhibitory synapse function, such as the postsynaptic scaffolding protein gephyrin and the RhoGEF collybistin. However, the majority of known interactors either bind to the GlyR α1 and β subunits, or the binding partner in the GlyR complex is unknown. Several potential GlyR interactors are not found at inhibitory synapses and/or have no clear functional role. Moreover, other GlyR interactors are <i>secondary interactors</i> that bind indirectly, for example, via gephyrin. In this review, we provide a critical evaluation of known GlyR interacting proteins and methodological limitations to date. We also provide a road map for the use of innovative and emerging interaction proteomic techniques that will unlock the GlyR interactome. With the emergence of disease-associated missense mutations in the α1, α2 and β subunit intracellular domains in startle disease and NDDs, understanding the identity and roles of GlyR accessory proteins is vital in understanding GlyR function and dysfunction in health and disease.\n <figure>\n <div><picture>\n <source></source></picture><p></p>\n </div>\n </figure></p>","PeriodicalId":16527,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neurochemistry","volume":"169 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jnc.70061","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neurochemistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jnc.70061","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Glycine receptors (GlyRs) are typically known for mediating inhibitory synaptic transmission within the spinal cord and brainstem, but they also have key roles in embryonic brain development, learning/memory, inflammatory pain sensitization, and rhythmic breathing. GlyR dysfunction has been implicated in multiple neurological disease states, including startle disease (GlyR α1β) and neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs) including autism spectrum disorder (ASD), intellectual disability (ID), developmental delay (DD) and epilepsy (GlyR α2). However, GlyRs do not operate in isolation but depend upon stable and transient protein–protein interactions (PPIs) that influence synaptic localization, homeostasis, signaling pathways, and receptor function. Despite the affinity purification of GlyRs using the antagonist strychnine over four decades ago, we still have much to learn about native GlyR stoichiometry and accessory proteins. In contrast to other neurotransmitter receptors, < 20 potential GlyR interactors have been identified to date. These include some well-known proteins that are vital to inhibitory synapse function, such as the postsynaptic scaffolding protein gephyrin and the RhoGEF collybistin. However, the majority of known interactors either bind to the GlyR α1 and β subunits, or the binding partner in the GlyR complex is unknown. Several potential GlyR interactors are not found at inhibitory synapses and/or have no clear functional role. Moreover, other GlyR interactors are secondary interactors that bind indirectly, for example, via gephyrin. In this review, we provide a critical evaluation of known GlyR interacting proteins and methodological limitations to date. We also provide a road map for the use of innovative and emerging interaction proteomic techniques that will unlock the GlyR interactome. With the emergence of disease-associated missense mutations in the α1, α2 and β subunit intracellular domains in startle disease and NDDs, understanding the identity and roles of GlyR accessory proteins is vital in understanding GlyR function and dysfunction in health and disease.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Neurochemistry focuses on molecular, cellular and biochemical aspects of the nervous system, the pathogenesis of neurological disorders and the development of disease specific biomarkers. It is devoted to the prompt publication of original findings of the highest scientific priority and value that provide novel mechanistic insights, represent a clear advance over previous studies and have the potential to generate exciting future research.