A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the Efficacy of Pre-School Language Interventions—Building Early Sentences Therapy and an Adapted Derbyshire Language Scheme

IF 1.5 3区 医学 Q2 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Cristina McKean, Christine Jack, Sean Pert, Carolyn Letts, Helen Stringer, Mark Masidlover, Anastasia Trebacz, Robert Rush, Emily Armstrong, Kate Conn, Jenny Sandham, Elaine Ashton, Naomi Rose
{"title":"A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the Efficacy of Pre-School Language Interventions—Building Early Sentences Therapy and an Adapted Derbyshire Language Scheme","authors":"Cristina McKean,&nbsp;Christine Jack,&nbsp;Sean Pert,&nbsp;Carolyn Letts,&nbsp;Helen Stringer,&nbsp;Mark Masidlover,&nbsp;Anastasia Trebacz,&nbsp;Robert Rush,&nbsp;Emily Armstrong,&nbsp;Kate Conn,&nbsp;Jenny Sandham,&nbsp;Elaine Ashton,&nbsp;Naomi Rose","doi":"10.1111/1460-6984.70036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Children's language abilities set the stage for their education, psychosocial development and life chances across the life course.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aims</h3>\n \n <p>To compare the efficacy of two preschool language interventions delivered with low dosages in early years settings (EYS): Building Early Sentences Therapy (BEST) and an Adapted Derbyshire Language Scheme (A-DLS). The former is informed by usage-based linguistic theory, the latter by typical language developmental patterns.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We conducted a pre-registered cluster randomized controlled trial in 20 EYS randomized to receive BEST or A-DLS. Children aged 3;05–4;05, who were monolingual, with comprehension and/or production scores ≤ 16th centile (New Reynell Developmental Language Scales—NRDLS) and no sensorineural hearing impairment, severe visual impairment or learning disability were eligible. A total of 102 children received the intervention. Speech and language therapists delivered interventions with high fidelity in 15-min group sessions twice weekly for 8 weeks. Baseline (T1), outcome (T2), and follow-up (T3) measures were completed blind to the intervention arm. Outcomes were NRDLS comprehension and production standard scores (SS), measures of language structures targeted in the interventions and communicative participation (FOCUS-34).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Both interventions were associated with significant change from T1 to T2 and from T1 to T3 in all outcomes. There were no differences between interventions in gains in NRDLS comprehension SS at T2 or T3. BEST produced greater gains in NRDLS production SS between T1–T2 (<i>d</i> = 0.40) and T1–T3 (<i>d</i> = 0.55) and in BEST-targeted sentences (<i>d</i> = 0.77). Children receiving BEST made significantly more progress after intervention (T2–T3) in both comprehension and production. Both interventions were associated with large, clinically significant changes in communicative participation as measured by teacher reports (FOCUS-34).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>A low-dosage intervention can produce language gains with moderate to large effects. The accelerated progress after the BEST intervention underscores the significant potential of interventions designed with reference to usage-based theory, which precisely manipulates language exposure to promote the specific cognitive mechanisms hypothesized to promote language learning.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS</h3>\n \n <div><i>What is already known on the subject</i>\n \n <ul>\n \n <li>Early language development sets the stage for children's educational and psychosocial development and their life chances into adulthood. Early language interventions can be effective; however, there is a need to develop and evaluate early interventions which bring large effects and which can be delivered within the constrained resources of early years provision. Usage-based linguistics have not been explicitly applied to the design of early language interventions. There is evidence that the Derbyshire Language Scheme (DLS) promotes positive outcomes in comprehension abilities and BEST in production.</li>\n </ul>\n </div>\n \n <div><i>What this paper adds to the existing knowledge</i>\n \n <ul>\n \n <li>Findings from a cluster-randomized controlled trial demonstrate that BEST, an 8-week, 15-min, small-group intervention, delivered twice weekly can produce moderate to high effects in expressive language outcomes for 3–4-year-old children with low language. A-DLS and BEST bring similar gains in comprehension standard scores but BEST leads to larger and more sustained progress in expression. Faster progress after intervention for BEST supports the hypothesis that it promotes the development of abstract representations of predicate-argument structures, supporting generalization and accelerating language learning.</li>\n </ul>\n </div>\n \n <div><i>What are the potential or actual clinical implications of this work?</i>\n \n <ul>\n \n <li>BEST, a low-dosage, manualized intervention delivered with high fidelity can be effective for children from a range of socio-economic backgrounds bringing moderate to high effects. Effective and efficient intervention can be delivered through the precise manipulation of active ingredients within intervention sessions (in this case, the cognitive mechanisms hypothesized to promote language learning and abstract knowledge in usage-based theory).</li>\n </ul>\n </div>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":49182,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders","volume":"60 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1460-6984.70036","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1460-6984.70036","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Children's language abilities set the stage for their education, psychosocial development and life chances across the life course.

Aims

To compare the efficacy of two preschool language interventions delivered with low dosages in early years settings (EYS): Building Early Sentences Therapy (BEST) and an Adapted Derbyshire Language Scheme (A-DLS). The former is informed by usage-based linguistic theory, the latter by typical language developmental patterns.

Methods

We conducted a pre-registered cluster randomized controlled trial in 20 EYS randomized to receive BEST or A-DLS. Children aged 3;05–4;05, who were monolingual, with comprehension and/or production scores ≤ 16th centile (New Reynell Developmental Language Scales—NRDLS) and no sensorineural hearing impairment, severe visual impairment or learning disability were eligible. A total of 102 children received the intervention. Speech and language therapists delivered interventions with high fidelity in 15-min group sessions twice weekly for 8 weeks. Baseline (T1), outcome (T2), and follow-up (T3) measures were completed blind to the intervention arm. Outcomes were NRDLS comprehension and production standard scores (SS), measures of language structures targeted in the interventions and communicative participation (FOCUS-34).

Results

Both interventions were associated with significant change from T1 to T2 and from T1 to T3 in all outcomes. There were no differences between interventions in gains in NRDLS comprehension SS at T2 or T3. BEST produced greater gains in NRDLS production SS between T1–T2 (d = 0.40) and T1–T3 (d = 0.55) and in BEST-targeted sentences (d = 0.77). Children receiving BEST made significantly more progress after intervention (T2–T3) in both comprehension and production. Both interventions were associated with large, clinically significant changes in communicative participation as measured by teacher reports (FOCUS-34).

Conclusions

A low-dosage intervention can produce language gains with moderate to large effects. The accelerated progress after the BEST intervention underscores the significant potential of interventions designed with reference to usage-based theory, which precisely manipulates language exposure to promote the specific cognitive mechanisms hypothesized to promote language learning.

WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS

What is already known on the subject
  • Early language development sets the stage for children's educational and psychosocial development and their life chances into adulthood. Early language interventions can be effective; however, there is a need to develop and evaluate early interventions which bring large effects and which can be delivered within the constrained resources of early years provision. Usage-based linguistics have not been explicitly applied to the design of early language interventions. There is evidence that the Derbyshire Language Scheme (DLS) promotes positive outcomes in comprehension abilities and BEST in production.
What this paper adds to the existing knowledge
  • Findings from a cluster-randomized controlled trial demonstrate that BEST, an 8-week, 15-min, small-group intervention, delivered twice weekly can produce moderate to high effects in expressive language outcomes for 3–4-year-old children with low language. A-DLS and BEST bring similar gains in comprehension standard scores but BEST leads to larger and more sustained progress in expression. Faster progress after intervention for BEST supports the hypothesis that it promotes the development of abstract representations of predicate-argument structures, supporting generalization and accelerating language learning.
What are the potential or actual clinical implications of this work?
  • BEST, a low-dosage, manualized intervention delivered with high fidelity can be effective for children from a range of socio-economic backgrounds bringing moderate to high effects. Effective and efficient intervention can be delivered through the precise manipulation of active ingredients within intervention sessions (in this case, the cognitive mechanisms hypothesized to promote language learning and abstract knowledge in usage-based theory).

Abstract Image

一组随机对照试验比较学前语言干预-建立早期句子治疗和适应德比郡语言方案的效果
儿童的语言能力为他们一生中的教育、心理社会发展和生活机会奠定了基础。目的比较两种低剂量的学前语言干预措施的效果:早期句子构建疗法(BEST)和适应性德比郡语言计划(A-DLS)。前者依据的是基于使用的语言学理论,后者依据的是典型的语言发展模式。方法我们对20名随机接受BEST或a - dls治疗的EYS进行了预注册的集群随机对照试验。年龄为3;05 - 4;05岁的单语儿童,理解和/或生产得分≤16分(New Reynell Developmental Language Scales-NRDLS),无感觉神经性听力障碍、严重视觉障碍或学习障碍。共有102名儿童接受了干预。言语和语言治疗师每周两次以15分钟的小组会议提供高保真的干预,持续8周。基线(T1)、结局(T2)和随访(T3)测量在干预组盲法下完成。结果是NRDLS理解和生产标准得分(SS),干预措施中针对的语言结构测量和交际参与(FOCUS-34)。结果两种干预措施在T1到T2和T1到T3的所有结局中都有显著变化。不同干预措施在T2或T3时NRDLS理解SS的增益没有差异。BEST在T1-T2 (d = 0.40)和T1-T3 (d = 0.55)以及BEST目标句子(d = 0.77)中产生了更大的NRDLS生成SS。接受BEST治疗的儿童在干预后(T2-T3)的理解能力和生产能力均有显著提高。根据教师报告(FOCUS-34),这两种干预措施都与交际参与的重大临床显著变化有关。结论低剂量干预可获得中等到较大的语言效果。BEST干预后的加速进展强调了参考基于使用的理论设计的干预措施的巨大潜力,该理论精确地操纵语言暴露以促进假设的促进语言学习的特定认知机制。早期语言发展为儿童的教育和社会心理发展以及他们成年后的生活机会奠定了基础。早期语言干预是有效的;然而,有必要制定和评估早期干预措施,这些干预措施可以产生巨大影响,并可以在早期提供的有限资源范围内提供。基于使用的语言学尚未明确应用于早期语言干预的设计。有证据表明,德比郡语言计划(DLS)促进了理解能力和生产能力的积极结果。一项集群随机对照试验的研究结果表明,每周二次、为期8周、时长15分钟的BEST小群体干预对3 - 4岁语言能力低下儿童的表达性语言结果可产生中高效果。A-DLS和BEST在理解标准分数上取得了类似的进步,但BEST在表达方面取得了更大、更持久的进步。BEST干预后的更快进步支持了这样的假设,即它促进了谓词-论证结构的抽象表征的发展,支持概括和加速语言学习。这项工作的潜在或实际临床意义是什么?BEST是一种低剂量、高保真的人工干预,对来自各种社会经济背景的儿童有效,具有中等到高度的效果。 有效和高效的干预可以通过在干预过程中对有效成分的精确操纵来实现(在这种情况下,使用基础理论中假设的促进语言学习和抽象知识的认知机制)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders
International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY-REHABILITATION
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
116
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders (IJLCD) is the official journal of the Royal College of Speech & Language Therapists. The Journal welcomes submissions on all aspects of speech, language, communication disorders and speech and language therapy. It provides a forum for the exchange of information and discussion of issues of clinical or theoretical relevance in the above areas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信