Proof-of-Diversity (PoD): A Framework for Equitable Blockchain Governance

IF 3.4 3区 计算机科学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS
M. Erdem Isenkul
{"title":"Proof-of-Diversity (PoD): A Framework for Equitable Blockchain Governance","authors":"M. Erdem Isenkul","doi":"10.1109/ACCESS.2025.3562391","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper introduces the Proof-of-Diversity (PoD) protocol, a new consensus mechanism that enhances decentralization, security, and energy efficiency using demographic, geographic, and computational diversity in validator selection. By using a multi-dimensional entropy-based approach, PoD shows high resistance to Sybil attacks, fosters inclusion, and ensures fair participation. Comparative analysis with Tendermint Proof-of-Stake (PoS) and Algorand Proof-of-Stake (Algorand) shows that PoD is more effective in various key metrics, including transaction finality, validator engagement, diversity entropy, energy use, and adaptability. In particular, PoD achieves a shortest average transaction finality time of 72.84 ms over a given period, a notable improvement compared to both Algorand at 215.37 ms and Tendermint PoS at 278.42 ms. In addition, PoD achieves a validator engagement of 85.42%, strengthening its ability to maintain decentralization. PoD also achieves a diversity score of 0.79, better than Tendermint PoS and Algorand, indicating a more fair and inclusive validator selection process. In terms of energy use, PoD achieves a mere 0.0132 kWh per transaction per second (TPS), a considerable improvement compared to its counterparts. In addition, PoD shows better adaptability to changes in step parameters and changes in benefit-cost ratios, further improving validator selection and network optimization. Overall, these results make PoD a scalable and sustainable consensus system that balances diversity, security, and performance in blockchain networks.","PeriodicalId":13079,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Access","volume":"13 ","pages":"69116-69128"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=10969777","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Access","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10969777/","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper introduces the Proof-of-Diversity (PoD) protocol, a new consensus mechanism that enhances decentralization, security, and energy efficiency using demographic, geographic, and computational diversity in validator selection. By using a multi-dimensional entropy-based approach, PoD shows high resistance to Sybil attacks, fosters inclusion, and ensures fair participation. Comparative analysis with Tendermint Proof-of-Stake (PoS) and Algorand Proof-of-Stake (Algorand) shows that PoD is more effective in various key metrics, including transaction finality, validator engagement, diversity entropy, energy use, and adaptability. In particular, PoD achieves a shortest average transaction finality time of 72.84 ms over a given period, a notable improvement compared to both Algorand at 215.37 ms and Tendermint PoS at 278.42 ms. In addition, PoD achieves a validator engagement of 85.42%, strengthening its ability to maintain decentralization. PoD also achieves a diversity score of 0.79, better than Tendermint PoS and Algorand, indicating a more fair and inclusive validator selection process. In terms of energy use, PoD achieves a mere 0.0132 kWh per transaction per second (TPS), a considerable improvement compared to its counterparts. In addition, PoD shows better adaptability to changes in step parameters and changes in benefit-cost ratios, further improving validator selection and network optimization. Overall, these results make PoD a scalable and sustainable consensus system that balances diversity, security, and performance in blockchain networks.
多样性证明(PoD):公平的bb0治理框架
本文介绍了多样性证明(PoD)协议,这是一种新的共识机制,可以利用验证器选择中的人口统计、地理和计算多样性来增强去中心化、安全性和能源效率。通过使用基于多维熵的方法,PoD显示出对Sybil攻击的高度抵抗,促进包容,并确保公平参与。与Tendermint权益证明(PoS)和Algorand权益证明(Algorand)的比较分析表明,PoD在各种关键指标上更有效,包括交易终局性、验证者参与度、多样性熵、能源使用和适应性。特别是,PoD在给定时间内实现了最短的平均事务完成时间,为72.84 ms,与Algorand的215.37 ms和Tendermint的278.42 ms相比,这是一个显着的改进。此外,PoD实现了85.42%的验证器参与率,增强了其保持分散化的能力。PoD的多样性得分为0.79,优于Tendermint PoS和Algorand,表明验证器选择过程更加公平和包容。在能源使用方面,PoD每交易每秒仅实现0.0132千瓦时(TPS),与同类产品相比有了相当大的改进。此外,PoD对阶跃参数的变化和效益成本比的变化具有更好的适应性,进一步改善了验证器的选择和网络优化。总的来说,这些结果使PoD成为一个可扩展和可持续的共识系统,可以在区块链网络中平衡多样性、安全性和性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
IEEE Access
IEEE Access COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMSENGIN-ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
7.70%
发文量
6673
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: IEEE Access® is a multidisciplinary, open access (OA), applications-oriented, all-electronic archival journal that continuously presents the results of original research or development across all of IEEE''s fields of interest. IEEE Access will publish articles that are of high interest to readers, original, technically correct, and clearly presented. Supported by author publication charges (APC), its hallmarks are a rapid peer review and publication process with open access to all readers. Unlike IEEE''s traditional Transactions or Journals, reviews are "binary", in that reviewers will either Accept or Reject an article in the form it is submitted in order to achieve rapid turnaround. Especially encouraged are submissions on: Multidisciplinary topics, or applications-oriented articles and negative results that do not fit within the scope of IEEE''s traditional journals. Practical articles discussing new experiments or measurement techniques, interesting solutions to engineering. Development of new or improved fabrication or manufacturing techniques. Reviews or survey articles of new or evolving fields oriented to assist others in understanding the new area.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信