Ki Baek Lee , Seong Min Kim , Jong-Tae Yoon , Yura Ahn , Kyung-Hyun Do
{"title":"Radiation dose reduction and image quality enhancement for patients unable to elevate their arms in chest CT: A comparative study","authors":"Ki Baek Lee , Seong Min Kim , Jong-Tae Yoon , Yura Ahn , Kyung-Hyun Do","doi":"10.1016/j.ejrad.2025.112120","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To propose a method to effectively reduce radiation dose while enhancing image quality in chest CT for patients unable to elevate their arms utilizing the air–gap technique.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Chest CT images were acquired in three positions: arms raised (control group, position A), arms lowered with the air–gap technique utilizing an in-house device (position B), and arms lowered without the device (position C). Data were categorized by body weight. Radiation dose was assessed using dose-length product (DLP) values, with quantitative analyses of image noise, contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and CNR-to-dose ratio (CNRDR). Qualitative assessment utilized a Likert scale.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Average DLP was 473.7 ± 142.9 mGy × cm in position C, with the lowest in position A at 267.3 ± 93.3 mGy × cm. Position B had a DLP of 317.2 ± 121.4 mGy × cm, 18.7 % higher than position A but 33.0 % lower than position C. In patients over 70 kg, all positions exceeded the thoracic CT diagnostic reference level (DRL) (324.2 mGy × cm). For those under 70 kg (i.e., <50 kg, 50–70 kg), position B showed lower DLPs compared to the above DRL. Quantitative analysis indicated that position B maintained image quality similar to position A, with CNRDR of 30.2 ± 11.1 versus 26.6 ± 10.9 in position A, showing marginal significance (p = 0.046). The qualitative evaluation indicated that position A had the highest rating at 4.96, followed by position B at 4.51, and position C at 3.47.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The air–gap device with lowered arms during chest CT for patients unable to elevate their arms can reduce radiation dose while maintaining image quality. A custom-designed device facilitates safe and efficient procedures, especially for patients with higher body weight.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12063,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Radiology","volume":"188 ","pages":"Article 112120"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0720048X25002062","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose
To propose a method to effectively reduce radiation dose while enhancing image quality in chest CT for patients unable to elevate their arms utilizing the air–gap technique.
Methods
Chest CT images were acquired in three positions: arms raised (control group, position A), arms lowered with the air–gap technique utilizing an in-house device (position B), and arms lowered without the device (position C). Data were categorized by body weight. Radiation dose was assessed using dose-length product (DLP) values, with quantitative analyses of image noise, contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and CNR-to-dose ratio (CNRDR). Qualitative assessment utilized a Likert scale.
Results
Average DLP was 473.7 ± 142.9 mGy × cm in position C, with the lowest in position A at 267.3 ± 93.3 mGy × cm. Position B had a DLP of 317.2 ± 121.4 mGy × cm, 18.7 % higher than position A but 33.0 % lower than position C. In patients over 70 kg, all positions exceeded the thoracic CT diagnostic reference level (DRL) (324.2 mGy × cm). For those under 70 kg (i.e., <50 kg, 50–70 kg), position B showed lower DLPs compared to the above DRL. Quantitative analysis indicated that position B maintained image quality similar to position A, with CNRDR of 30.2 ± 11.1 versus 26.6 ± 10.9 in position A, showing marginal significance (p = 0.046). The qualitative evaluation indicated that position A had the highest rating at 4.96, followed by position B at 4.51, and position C at 3.47.
Conclusion
The air–gap device with lowered arms during chest CT for patients unable to elevate their arms can reduce radiation dose while maintaining image quality. A custom-designed device facilitates safe and efficient procedures, especially for patients with higher body weight.
期刊介绍:
European Journal of Radiology is an international journal which aims to communicate to its readers, state-of-the-art information on imaging developments in the form of high quality original research articles and timely reviews on current developments in the field.
Its audience includes clinicians at all levels of training including radiology trainees, newly qualified imaging specialists and the experienced radiologist. Its aim is to inform efficient, appropriate and evidence-based imaging practice to the benefit of patients worldwide.