Comparative evaluation and selection of heat exchangers using multicriteria decision-making

IF 1.9 3区 工程技术 Q1 NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
JunSoo Yoo , Sunming Qin , Silvino A. Balderrama Prieto , Erik Hisahara , Hansol Kim
{"title":"Comparative evaluation and selection of heat exchangers using multicriteria decision-making","authors":"JunSoo Yoo ,&nbsp;Sunming Qin ,&nbsp;Silvino A. Balderrama Prieto ,&nbsp;Erik Hisahara ,&nbsp;Hansol Kim","doi":"10.1016/j.nucengdes.2025.114066","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study presents a well-structured method for comparing and selecting HE technologies for an IES. The decision to select a HE for a particular IES configuration can vary greatly depending not only on engineering requirements but also on the customer’s specific demand. In other words, the HE selection for IES requires a multicriteria decision- making approach, taking into account diverse technical, economic, and safety aspects, as well as the relative priorities considered by energy users. This study employs a HE evaluation approach combining multicriteria decision-making techniques widely used in various industries: QFD and AHP techniques. Of particular interest is the use of the proposed method to select a high-temperature HEs that couples advanced nuclear reactors and industrial processes.</div><div>To build a practical basis for comparing HEs within the proposed framework, efforts were made to identify the various HEs requirements for IES purposes. In addition, leveraging the insights obtained from the literature review and the market survey of commercial HE suppliers, a knowledge base was built to facilitate the comparison of each requirement across various HE designs. Also, evaluation metrics were identified for HE requirements with a robust rationale to enhance the quality of decisions made throughout the proposed evaluation process. The evaluation procedure and knowledge base described in this study can provide a useful basis for those interested in screening the appropriate HE designs for various IES scenarios.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":19170,"journal":{"name":"Nuclear Engineering and Design","volume":"439 ","pages":"Article 114066"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nuclear Engineering and Design","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0029549325002432","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study presents a well-structured method for comparing and selecting HE technologies for an IES. The decision to select a HE for a particular IES configuration can vary greatly depending not only on engineering requirements but also on the customer’s specific demand. In other words, the HE selection for IES requires a multicriteria decision- making approach, taking into account diverse technical, economic, and safety aspects, as well as the relative priorities considered by energy users. This study employs a HE evaluation approach combining multicriteria decision-making techniques widely used in various industries: QFD and AHP techniques. Of particular interest is the use of the proposed method to select a high-temperature HEs that couples advanced nuclear reactors and industrial processes.
To build a practical basis for comparing HEs within the proposed framework, efforts were made to identify the various HEs requirements for IES purposes. In addition, leveraging the insights obtained from the literature review and the market survey of commercial HE suppliers, a knowledge base was built to facilitate the comparison of each requirement across various HE designs. Also, evaluation metrics were identified for HE requirements with a robust rationale to enhance the quality of decisions made throughout the proposed evaluation process. The evaluation procedure and knowledge base described in this study can provide a useful basis for those interested in screening the appropriate HE designs for various IES scenarios.
多准则决策下换热器的比较评价与选择
本研究提出了一种结构良好的方法来比较和选择用于IES的HE技术。为特定IES配置选择HE的决定不仅取决于工程需求,还取决于客户的特定需求。换句话说,IES的HE选择需要一个多标准的决策方法,考虑到不同的技术、经济和安全方面,以及能源用户考虑的相对优先事项。本研究采用了一种结合多标准决策技术的HE评估方法:QFD和AHP技术,广泛应用于各个行业。特别令人感兴趣的是使用所提出的方法来选择将先进核反应堆和工业过程结合在一起的高温he。为了在建议的架构内建立一个实际的基础,以比较卫生系统,我们努力确定各项卫生系统的要求。此外,利用从文献综述和商业HE供应商的市场调查中获得的见解,建立了一个知识库,以方便对各种HE设计中的每个需求进行比较。此外,为HE需求确定了评估度量标准,并提供了健壮的基本原理,以提高在整个建议的评估过程中所做决策的质量。本研究所描述的评估程序和知识基础,可为有兴趣为不同IES方案筛选合适的HE设计的人士提供有用的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nuclear Engineering and Design
Nuclear Engineering and Design 工程技术-核科学技术
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
11.80%
发文量
377
审稿时长
5 months
期刊介绍: Nuclear Engineering and Design covers the wide range of disciplines involved in the engineering, design, safety and construction of nuclear fission reactors. The Editors welcome papers both on applied and innovative aspects and developments in nuclear science and technology. Fundamentals of Reactor Design include: • Thermal-Hydraulics and Core Physics • Safety Analysis, Risk Assessment (PSA) • Structural and Mechanical Engineering • Materials Science • Fuel Behavior and Design • Structural Plant Design • Engineering of Reactor Components • Experiments Aspects beyond fundamentals of Reactor Design covered: • Accident Mitigation Measures • Reactor Control Systems • Licensing Issues • Safeguard Engineering • Economy of Plants • Reprocessing / Waste Disposal • Applications of Nuclear Energy • Maintenance • Decommissioning Papers on new reactor ideas and developments (Generation IV reactors) such as inherently safe modular HTRs, High Performance LWRs/HWRs and LMFBs/GFR will be considered; Actinide Burners, Accelerator Driven Systems, Energy Amplifiers and other special designs of power and research reactors and their applications are also encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信