Andreas Theofanopoulos , Lucas Troude , Katharina Faust , Sajjad Muhammad
{"title":"Review of treatment modalities and clinical outcome of giant saccular posterior inferior cerebellar artery aneurysms","authors":"Andreas Theofanopoulos , Lucas Troude , Katharina Faust , Sajjad Muhammad","doi":"10.1016/j.neuchi.2025.101674","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Giant posterior inferior cerebellar artery (PICA) aneurysms are rare lesions carrying significant morbidity due to mass effect and present therapeutic challenges due to proximity to critical neurovascular structures.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>A systematic literature review through the PubMed and Scopus databases was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines to identify cases of giant PICA aneurysms treated either microsurgically or by endovascular means. Patients’ demographics, aneurysm size, preoperative and postoperative neurologic status, clinical outcomes as well as follow-up information were retrieved.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Data from 24 studies including 24 patients was obtained. Mean patient age was 53.42 years, with a male-to-female ratio of approximately 1:2. Mean maximum aneurysm diameter was 33.43 mm. A favorable outcome (mRS 0–2) was reported on 66.7% of endovascular and 84.2% of microsurgical cases. Death rate was 0% for endovascular and 5.3% for open cases. The PICA was sacrificed in 33% of the patients without lasting morbidity. 87.5% of the aneurysms were partially thrombosed, 41.7% were debulked due to mass effect and 20.8% required a revascularization procedure.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Giant PICA aneurysms are amenable to both microsurgery and endovascular treatment. The latter may require PICA sacrifice which may be safely attempted in distal aneurysms. Proximal aneurysms which cannot be safely embolized or ones with significant mass effect may benefit from microsurgical occlusion and may require debulking and/or PICA bypass.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51141,"journal":{"name":"Neurochirurgie","volume":"71 4","pages":"Article 101674"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurochirurgie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0028377025000475","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction
Giant posterior inferior cerebellar artery (PICA) aneurysms are rare lesions carrying significant morbidity due to mass effect and present therapeutic challenges due to proximity to critical neurovascular structures.
Materials and methods
A systematic literature review through the PubMed and Scopus databases was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines to identify cases of giant PICA aneurysms treated either microsurgically or by endovascular means. Patients’ demographics, aneurysm size, preoperative and postoperative neurologic status, clinical outcomes as well as follow-up information were retrieved.
Results
Data from 24 studies including 24 patients was obtained. Mean patient age was 53.42 years, with a male-to-female ratio of approximately 1:2. Mean maximum aneurysm diameter was 33.43 mm. A favorable outcome (mRS 0–2) was reported on 66.7% of endovascular and 84.2% of microsurgical cases. Death rate was 0% for endovascular and 5.3% for open cases. The PICA was sacrificed in 33% of the patients without lasting morbidity. 87.5% of the aneurysms were partially thrombosed, 41.7% were debulked due to mass effect and 20.8% required a revascularization procedure.
Conclusions
Giant PICA aneurysms are amenable to both microsurgery and endovascular treatment. The latter may require PICA sacrifice which may be safely attempted in distal aneurysms. Proximal aneurysms which cannot be safely embolized or ones with significant mass effect may benefit from microsurgical occlusion and may require debulking and/or PICA bypass.
期刊介绍:
Neurochirurgie publishes articles on treatment, teaching and research, neurosurgery training and the professional aspects of our discipline, and also the history and progress of neurosurgery. It focuses on pathologies of the head, spine and central and peripheral nervous systems and their vascularization. All aspects of the specialty are dealt with: trauma, tumor, degenerative disease, infection, vascular pathology, and radiosurgery, and pediatrics. Transversal studies are also welcome: neuroanatomy, neurophysiology, neurology, neuropediatrics, psychiatry, neuropsychology, physical medicine and neurologic rehabilitation, neuro-anesthesia, neurologic intensive care, neuroradiology, functional exploration, neuropathology, neuro-ophthalmology, otoneurology, maxillofacial surgery, neuro-endocrinology and spine surgery. Technical and methodological aspects are also taken onboard: diagnostic and therapeutic techniques, methods for assessing results, epidemiology, surgical, interventional and radiological techniques, simulations and pathophysiological hypotheses, and educational tools. The editorial board may refuse submissions that fail to meet the journal''s aims and scope; such studies will not be peer-reviewed, and the editor in chief will promptly inform the corresponding author, so as not to delay submission to a more suitable journal.
With a view to attracting an international audience of both readers and writers, Neurochirurgie especially welcomes articles in English, and gives priority to original studies. Other kinds of article - reviews, case reports, technical notes and meta-analyses - are equally published.
Every year, a special edition is dedicated to the topic selected by the French Society of Neurosurgery for its annual report.