Disposition towards automated driving scale (DADS): Development and psychometric properties of a brief self-report measure to assess subject’s disposition towards automated driving
Antonella Somma , Andrea Fossati , Linda Boscaro , Andrea Galbiati , Maria Gabriella Signorini , Massimiliano Gobbi
{"title":"Disposition towards automated driving scale (DADS): Development and psychometric properties of a brief self-report measure to assess subject’s disposition towards automated driving","authors":"Antonella Somma , Andrea Fossati , Linda Boscaro , Andrea Galbiati , Maria Gabriella Signorini , Massimiliano Gobbi","doi":"10.1016/j.trf.2025.04.017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Positive disposition and trust in automated vehicle systems is a fundamental requisite for using, buying and taking full advantage of automated vehicles (AVs). The present study aims at developing a short, but psychometrically sound, measures of AVs acceptance that could be administered to both large samples and during experimental sessions. To this aim, in a preliminary study, we developed the Disposition towards Automated Driving Scale (DADS), an 11-item self-report measure. To test the psychometric properties of the DADS, 590 adult participants were administered the Disposition towards Automated Driving Scale (DADS). The DADS showed adequate factor structure and internal consistency. Additionally, the DADS showed negative and significant associations with theoretically relevant constructs, including subject’s interest in car driving (Spearman <em>r</em> = −0.11, <em>p</em> < 0.01), Driver Behavior Questionnaire Aggressive Violations scale scores (Spearman <em>r</em> = −0.13, <em>p</em> < 0.0125), and Big Five Inventory Neuroticism scale scores (Spearman <em>r</em> = −0.14, <em>p</em> < 0.01). To test the practical utility of the DADS in an experimental context, an independent sample of 55 participants completed the DADS during an experimental automated driving study using a dynamic driving simulator. Notably, the DADS scores were provided with adequate reliability also in this context and showed positive and significant associations with the involvement experienced during the automated driving experimental session (Spearman <em>r</em> = 0.32, <em>p</em> < 0.05), and the subjective experience of realism (Spearman <em>r</em> = 0.37, <em>p</em> < 0.01). As a whole, the use of the DADS may contribute to understanding AVs acceptance across different populations and contexts, while paving the way for future studies on the barriers that still hinder the acceptance of AVs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48355,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour","volume":"112 ","pages":"Pages 305-321"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1369847825001433","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Positive disposition and trust in automated vehicle systems is a fundamental requisite for using, buying and taking full advantage of automated vehicles (AVs). The present study aims at developing a short, but psychometrically sound, measures of AVs acceptance that could be administered to both large samples and during experimental sessions. To this aim, in a preliminary study, we developed the Disposition towards Automated Driving Scale (DADS), an 11-item self-report measure. To test the psychometric properties of the DADS, 590 adult participants were administered the Disposition towards Automated Driving Scale (DADS). The DADS showed adequate factor structure and internal consistency. Additionally, the DADS showed negative and significant associations with theoretically relevant constructs, including subject’s interest in car driving (Spearman r = −0.11, p < 0.01), Driver Behavior Questionnaire Aggressive Violations scale scores (Spearman r = −0.13, p < 0.0125), and Big Five Inventory Neuroticism scale scores (Spearman r = −0.14, p < 0.01). To test the practical utility of the DADS in an experimental context, an independent sample of 55 participants completed the DADS during an experimental automated driving study using a dynamic driving simulator. Notably, the DADS scores were provided with adequate reliability also in this context and showed positive and significant associations with the involvement experienced during the automated driving experimental session (Spearman r = 0.32, p < 0.05), and the subjective experience of realism (Spearman r = 0.37, p < 0.01). As a whole, the use of the DADS may contribute to understanding AVs acceptance across different populations and contexts, while paving the way for future studies on the barriers that still hinder the acceptance of AVs.
对自动驾驶汽车系统的积极态度和信任是使用、购买和充分利用自动驾驶汽车的基本条件。目前的研究旨在开发一种简短但心理测量学上合理的自动驾驶汽车接受度测量方法,这种方法可以在大样本和实验过程中使用。为此,在初步研究中,我们开发了自动驾驶倾向量表(DADS),这是一个包含11个项目的自我报告测量。为了测试自动驾驶倾向量表的心理测量特性,590名成年参与者接受了自动驾驶倾向量表(DADS)的测试。DADS具有良好的因子结构和内部一致性。此外,DADS与理论相关构式(包括受试者对汽车驾驶的兴趣)呈显著负相关(Spearman r = - 0.11, p <;0.01),驾驶员行为问卷攻击性违规量表得分(Spearman r = - 0.13, p <;0.0125),以及大五量表神经质评分(Spearman r = - 0.14, p <;0.01)。为了测试DADS在实验环境中的实际效用,55名参与者的独立样本在使用动态驾驶模拟器的实验性自动驾驶研究中完成了DADS。值得注意的是,在这种情况下,DADS分数也提供了足够的信度,并且与自动驾驶实验期间经历的投入表现出积极而显著的关联(Spearman r = 0.32, p <;主观真实感体验(Spearman r = 0.37, p <;0.01)。总体而言,DADS的使用可能有助于了解不同人群和环境对自动驾驶汽车的接受程度,同时为未来研究仍然阻碍自动驾驶汽车接受的障碍铺平道路。
期刊介绍:
Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour focuses on the behavioural and psychological aspects of traffic and transport. The aim of the journal is to enhance theory development, improve the quality of empirical studies and to stimulate the application of research findings in practice. TRF provides a focus and a means of communication for the considerable amount of research activities that are now being carried out in this field. The journal provides a forum for transportation researchers, psychologists, ergonomists, engineers and policy-makers with an interest in traffic and transport psychology.