Addressing human–elephant conflicts in Taita Taveta County, Kenya: Integrating species distribution modeling into targeted conservation strategies

IF 3.5 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
Tino Johansson , Martha Munyao , Petri K.E. Pellikka , Sakari Äärilä , Patrick Omondi , Mika Siljander
{"title":"Addressing human–elephant conflicts in Taita Taveta County, Kenya: Integrating species distribution modeling into targeted conservation strategies","authors":"Tino Johansson ,&nbsp;Martha Munyao ,&nbsp;Petri K.E. Pellikka ,&nbsp;Sakari Äärilä ,&nbsp;Patrick Omondi ,&nbsp;Mika Siljander","doi":"10.1016/j.gecco.2025.e03604","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Increasing competition for space and resources at the agriculture-conservation interface poses critical challenges to wildlife conservation, often intensifying human–wildlife conflicts throughout the globe, including Kenya. With approximately 70 % of Kenya’s wildlife residing outside protected areas, land conversion for agriculture exacerbates human–wildlife conflicts, particularly involving African elephants (<em>Loxodonta africana</em>). Taita Taveta County in Kenya represents a hotspot for human–elephant conflict, where these incidents undermine both conservation efforts and livelihoods. This study assesses multiple distribution model algorithms and ensemble models, using Kenya Wildlife Service incident data and ten geospatial variables, to predict human–elephant conflicts in the county. The study extends the spatial pattern analysis to the comprehensive comparison of outputs, such as probability and risk maps, thus filling a critical gap by offering an innovative framework for human–elephant conflict modeling. Probability maps were reclassified into risk maps, and landscape metrics were derived to evaluate the spatial patterns of conflict risk. Results highlight that the ensemble model demonstrated superior consistency, predictive accuracy, and provided a more balanced representation of human–elephant conflict risk compared to single-algorithm models. The analysis identified proximity to houses and crops as key conflict predictors, with high-risk zones concentrated near human settlements and low-risk zones confined to protected areas. This study proposes that landscape metrics can further enhance the evaluation of risk map performance. By integrating ensemble modelling and landscape metrics, this research provides policymakers with actionable tools to balance human needs with conservation priorities, fostering sustainable human–elephant coexistence in Taita Taveta County and beyond.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54264,"journal":{"name":"Global Ecology and Conservation","volume":"60 ","pages":"Article e03604"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Ecology and Conservation","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2351989425002057","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Increasing competition for space and resources at the agriculture-conservation interface poses critical challenges to wildlife conservation, often intensifying human–wildlife conflicts throughout the globe, including Kenya. With approximately 70 % of Kenya’s wildlife residing outside protected areas, land conversion for agriculture exacerbates human–wildlife conflicts, particularly involving African elephants (Loxodonta africana). Taita Taveta County in Kenya represents a hotspot for human–elephant conflict, where these incidents undermine both conservation efforts and livelihoods. This study assesses multiple distribution model algorithms and ensemble models, using Kenya Wildlife Service incident data and ten geospatial variables, to predict human–elephant conflicts in the county. The study extends the spatial pattern analysis to the comprehensive comparison of outputs, such as probability and risk maps, thus filling a critical gap by offering an innovative framework for human–elephant conflict modeling. Probability maps were reclassified into risk maps, and landscape metrics were derived to evaluate the spatial patterns of conflict risk. Results highlight that the ensemble model demonstrated superior consistency, predictive accuracy, and provided a more balanced representation of human–elephant conflict risk compared to single-algorithm models. The analysis identified proximity to houses and crops as key conflict predictors, with high-risk zones concentrated near human settlements and low-risk zones confined to protected areas. This study proposes that landscape metrics can further enhance the evaluation of risk map performance. By integrating ensemble modelling and landscape metrics, this research provides policymakers with actionable tools to balance human needs with conservation priorities, fostering sustainable human–elephant coexistence in Taita Taveta County and beyond.
解决肯尼亚Taita Taveta县的人象冲突:将物种分布模型整合到有针对性的保护策略中
在农业和保护的界面上,对空间和资源的竞争日益激烈,对野生动物保护构成了严峻的挑战,往往加剧了包括肯尼亚在内的全球人类与野生动物的冲突。大约70% %的肯尼亚野生动物生活在保护区之外,土地转化为农业加剧了人类与野生动物的冲突,特别是涉及非洲象(Loxodonta africana)。肯尼亚的塔塔塔维塔县是人象冲突的热点地区,这些事件破坏了保护工作和生计。本研究利用肯尼亚野生动物管理局的事件数据和十个地理空间变量,评估了多种分布模型算法和集成模型,以预测该县的人象冲突。该研究将空间格局分析扩展到综合比较输出,例如概率和风险图,从而通过提供人象冲突建模的创新框架填补了一个关键空白。将概率图重新分类为风险图,并导出景观度量来评价冲突风险的空间格局。结果表明,与单一算法模型相比,集成模型具有更好的一致性和预测准确性,并且提供了更平衡的人象冲突风险表示。分析发现,靠近房屋和农作物是关键的冲突预测因素,高风险区域集中在人类住区附近,低风险区域仅限于保护区。本研究提出景观指标可以进一步增强风险图绩效的评价。通过集成集成模型和景观指标,本研究为政策制定者提供了可操作的工具,以平衡人类需求和保护优先事项,促进泰塔塔维塔县及其他地区的可持续人象共存。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Global Ecology and Conservation
Global Ecology and Conservation Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
5.00%
发文量
346
审稿时长
83 days
期刊介绍: Global Ecology and Conservation is a peer-reviewed, open-access journal covering all sub-disciplines of ecological and conservation science: from theory to practice, from molecules to ecosystems, from regional to global. The fields covered include: organismal, population, community, and ecosystem ecology; physiological, evolutionary, and behavioral ecology; and conservation science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信