Effects of Intraspecific and Interspecific Indirect Competition on Foraging Activity in Subtropical Facultative and Obligatory Shredder Organisms

IF 1.6 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ECOLOGY
Austral Ecology Pub Date : 2025-04-25 DOI:10.1111/aec.70070
Giovana Rech Durigon, Emanuel Rampanelli Cararo, Cássia Alves Lima-Rezende, Renan de Souza Rezende
{"title":"Effects of Intraspecific and Interspecific Indirect Competition on Foraging Activity in Subtropical Facultative and Obligatory Shredder Organisms","authors":"Giovana Rech Durigon,&nbsp;Emanuel Rampanelli Cararo,&nbsp;Cássia Alves Lima-Rezende,&nbsp;Renan de Souza Rezende","doi":"10.1111/aec.70070","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>While the recognised influence of resource competition on the structure of aquatic ecosystems is well-established, its effects on allochthonous matter dynamics in streams, particularly regarding interspecific and intraspecific indirect competition, remain understudied and inadequately understood. In this investigation, we explored the impacts of interspecific and intraspecific indirect competition on leaf litter consumption by the shredder organisms <i>Phylloicus</i> spp. and <i>Aegla</i> spp. The effects of indirect competition were evaluated through a microcosm experimental setup, comprised of two controls and three treatments: (i) <i>Phylloicus</i> control competition-free; (ii) <i>Aegla</i> control competition-free; (iii) intraspecific competition within <i>Aegla</i>; (iv) intraspecific competition within <i>Phylloicus</i>; and (v) interspecific competition. In the competition-free controls, a single organism occupied a 2 L microcosm, whereas in indirect competitive pressure treatments, two organisms were introduced into a 4 L microcosm with a 0.05-mm mesh partition. Our findings revealed that interspecific indirect competition had a disproportionately higher impact on <i>Phylloicus</i>, whereas intraspecific indirect competition had a more pronounced effect on <i>Aegla</i>. <i>Phylloicus</i> demonstrated superior shredding efficiency compared to <i>Aegla</i>, possibly due to <i>Aegla</i>'s broader feeding range and distinctive leaf litter utilisation strategies. The presence of potential competitors led to reduced consumption rates in <i>Phylloicus</i>, highlighting its sensitivity to competition. Furthermore, <i>Aegla</i>'s predatory behaviour and cannibalism likely intensified intraspecific indirect competition within the species. These results underscore the pivotal role of indirect competition in shaping the feeding behaviour of shredder organisms in leaf litter banks, ultimately influencing plant matter fragmentation in aquatic ecosystems.</p>","PeriodicalId":8663,"journal":{"name":"Austral Ecology","volume":"50 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/aec.70070","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Austral Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/aec.70070","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

While the recognised influence of resource competition on the structure of aquatic ecosystems is well-established, its effects on allochthonous matter dynamics in streams, particularly regarding interspecific and intraspecific indirect competition, remain understudied and inadequately understood. In this investigation, we explored the impacts of interspecific and intraspecific indirect competition on leaf litter consumption by the shredder organisms Phylloicus spp. and Aegla spp. The effects of indirect competition were evaluated through a microcosm experimental setup, comprised of two controls and three treatments: (i) Phylloicus control competition-free; (ii) Aegla control competition-free; (iii) intraspecific competition within Aegla; (iv) intraspecific competition within Phylloicus; and (v) interspecific competition. In the competition-free controls, a single organism occupied a 2 L microcosm, whereas in indirect competitive pressure treatments, two organisms were introduced into a 4 L microcosm with a 0.05-mm mesh partition. Our findings revealed that interspecific indirect competition had a disproportionately higher impact on Phylloicus, whereas intraspecific indirect competition had a more pronounced effect on Aegla. Phylloicus demonstrated superior shredding efficiency compared to Aegla, possibly due to Aegla's broader feeding range and distinctive leaf litter utilisation strategies. The presence of potential competitors led to reduced consumption rates in Phylloicus, highlighting its sensitivity to competition. Furthermore, Aegla's predatory behaviour and cannibalism likely intensified intraspecific indirect competition within the species. These results underscore the pivotal role of indirect competition in shaping the feeding behaviour of shredder organisms in leaf litter banks, ultimately influencing plant matter fragmentation in aquatic ecosystems.

Abstract Image

种内和种间间接竞争对亚热带兼性和强制性碎纸机生物觅食活动的影响
虽然公认的资源竞争对水生生态系统结构的影响已经确立,但其对溪流中异域物质动态的影响,特别是种间和种内间接竞争的影响,仍未得到充分研究和充分了解。本研究探讨了种间和种内间接竞争对碎纸机生物Phylloicus spp.和Aegla spp.凋落叶消耗的影响,并通过2个对照和3个处理的微观环境实验来评估间接竞争的影响:(1)Phylloicus控制无竞争;Aegla管制无竞争;(iii) Aegla的种内竞争;(iv) Phylloicus种内竞争;(五)种间竞争。在无竞争条件下,1个微生物占据2 L的微环境,而在间接竞争压力处理下,2个生物被引入一个4 L的微环境,并以0.05 mm的网格分隔。结果表明,种间间接竞争对Phylloicus的影响更大,而种内间接竞争对Aegla的影响更明显。Phylloicus表现出比Aegla更高的切碎效率,这可能是由于Aegla更广泛的摄食范围和独特的落叶利用策略。潜在竞争者的存在导致叶根菌的食用量降低,突出了其对竞争的敏感性。此外,Aegla的掠食行为和同类相食可能加剧了物种内的间接竞争。这些结果强调了间接竞争在塑造碎纸机生物在凋落叶库中的摄食行为方面的关键作用,最终影响水生生态系统中的植物物质碎片化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Austral Ecology
Austral Ecology 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
117
审稿时长
12-24 weeks
期刊介绍: Austral Ecology is the premier journal for basic and applied ecology in the Southern Hemisphere. As the official Journal of The Ecological Society of Australia (ESA), Austral Ecology addresses the commonality between ecosystems in Australia and many parts of southern Africa, South America, New Zealand and Oceania. For example many species in the unique biotas of these regions share common Gondwana ancestors. ESA''s aim is to publish innovative research to encourage the sharing of information and experiences that enrich the understanding of the ecology of the Southern Hemisphere. Austral Ecology involves an editorial board with representatives from Australia, South Africa, New Zealand, Brazil and Argentina. These representatives provide expert opinions, access to qualified reviewers and act as a focus for attracting a wide range of contributions from countries across the region. Austral Ecology publishes original papers describing experimental, observational or theoretical studies on terrestrial, marine or freshwater systems, which are considered without taxonomic bias. Special thematic issues are published regularly, including symposia on the ecology of estuaries and soft sediment habitats, freshwater systems and coral reef fish.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信