Lung Transplantation From Donors With a History of Substance Use

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
David Li, Justin Weinkauf, Alim Hirji, Jason Weatherald, Rhea Varughese, Laura van den Bosch, Dale Lien, Jayan Nagendran, Kieran Halloran
{"title":"Lung Transplantation From Donors With a History of Substance Use","authors":"David Li,&nbsp;Justin Weinkauf,&nbsp;Alim Hirji,&nbsp;Jason Weatherald,&nbsp;Rhea Varughese,&nbsp;Laura van den Bosch,&nbsp;Dale Lien,&nbsp;Jayan Nagendran,&nbsp;Kieran Halloran","doi":"10.1111/ctr.70162","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Substance use is common among lung transplant donors, but concerns persist about graft damage. Stimulant drugs such as cocaine and methamphetamine can induce pulmonary arterial hypertension, while smoked products such as cannabis and crack cocaine can produce airway and parenchymal diseases. We sought to characterize donor substance use at our center and evaluate the associations with recipient survival as well as chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD), severe primary graft dysfunction (PGD3), and baseline lung allograft dysfunction (BLAD).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We studied patients with double lung transplants in our program between 2004 and 2016, including a history of donor substance use with nine pre-specified agents. We modeled the association with time to death or retransplant, CLAD, severe PGD, and BLAD.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Of 473 recipients, 186 (39%) received lungs from a donor with a history of substance use with at least one of the pre-specified substances. There was no overall relationship between donor substance use and any outcome. Heavy donor smoking was associated with an increased risk of death or retransplant (hazard ratio 1.47; <i>p</i> = 0.032), PGD3 (odds ratio [OR]: 2.13; <i>p</i> = 0.014), and BLAD (OR 2.56; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). Donor crack cocaine use (<i>n</i> = 24) was also associated with worse survival (HR 2.16; 95% CI 1.16–3.66; <i>p</i> = 0.017) but not CLAD or BLAD. We noted no CLAD associations with any drug.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>A history of donor substance use was common and in general not associated with worse outcomes, aside from heavy donor smoking. These findings may have implications for allocation and post-transplant graft dysfunction.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":10467,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Transplantation","volume":"39 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ctr.70162","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ctr.70162","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Substance use is common among lung transplant donors, but concerns persist about graft damage. Stimulant drugs such as cocaine and methamphetamine can induce pulmonary arterial hypertension, while smoked products such as cannabis and crack cocaine can produce airway and parenchymal diseases. We sought to characterize donor substance use at our center and evaluate the associations with recipient survival as well as chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD), severe primary graft dysfunction (PGD3), and baseline lung allograft dysfunction (BLAD).

Methods

We studied patients with double lung transplants in our program between 2004 and 2016, including a history of donor substance use with nine pre-specified agents. We modeled the association with time to death or retransplant, CLAD, severe PGD, and BLAD.

Results

Of 473 recipients, 186 (39%) received lungs from a donor with a history of substance use with at least one of the pre-specified substances. There was no overall relationship between donor substance use and any outcome. Heavy donor smoking was associated with an increased risk of death or retransplant (hazard ratio 1.47; p = 0.032), PGD3 (odds ratio [OR]: 2.13; p = 0.014), and BLAD (OR 2.56; p < 0.001). Donor crack cocaine use (n = 24) was also associated with worse survival (HR 2.16; 95% CI 1.16–3.66; p = 0.017) but not CLAD or BLAD. We noted no CLAD associations with any drug.

Conclusion

A history of donor substance use was common and in general not associated with worse outcomes, aside from heavy donor smoking. These findings may have implications for allocation and post-transplant graft dysfunction.

Abstract Image

有药物使用史的供体肺移植
药物使用在肺移植供体中很常见,但对移植物损伤的担忧仍然存在。可卡因和甲基苯丙胺等兴奋剂可诱发肺动脉高压,而大麻和快克可卡因等吸食产品可导致气道和实质疾病。我们试图在我们的中心描述供体物质的使用,并评估与受体生存以及慢性同种异体肺移植功能障碍(CLAD)、严重原发性移植物功能障碍(PGD3)和基线同种异体肺移植功能障碍(BLAD)的关系。方法研究2004年至2016年双肺移植患者,包括9种预先指定药物的供体物质使用史。我们建立了与死亡或再移植时间、CLAD、严重PGD和BLAD的关系模型。结果在473名受者中,186名(39%)接受的肺来自至少使用过一种预先指定物质的供者。供体物质使用与任何结果之间没有总体关系。重度供体吸烟与死亡或再移植风险增加相关(危险比1.47;p = 0.032), PGD3(优势比[OR]: 2.13;p = 0.014), BLAD (OR 2.56;p & lt;0.001)。供体使用快克可卡因(n = 24)也与较差的生存率相关(HR 2.16;95% ci 1.16-3.66;p = 0.017),而不是CLAD或BLAD。我们没有注意到与任何药物有关。结论:除供体重度吸烟外,有供体物质使用史是常见的,一般与较差的预后无关。这些发现可能对移植物的分配和移植后的功能障碍有启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Transplantation
Clinical Transplantation 医学-外科
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
286
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Transplantation: The Journal of Clinical and Translational Research aims to serve as a channel of rapid communication for all those involved in the care of patients who require, or have had, organ or tissue transplants, including: kidney, intestine, liver, pancreas, islets, heart, heart valves, lung, bone marrow, cornea, skin, bone, and cartilage, viable or stored. Published monthly, Clinical Transplantation’s scope is focused on the complete spectrum of present transplant therapies, as well as also those that are experimental or may become possible in future. Topics include: Immunology and immunosuppression; Patient preparation; Social, ethical, and psychological issues; Complications, short- and long-term results; Artificial organs; Donation and preservation of organ and tissue; Translational studies; Advances in tissue typing; Updates on transplant pathology;. Clinical and translational studies are particularly welcome, as well as focused reviews. Full-length papers and short communications are invited. Clinical reviews are encouraged, as well as seminal papers in basic science which might lead to immediate clinical application. Prominence is regularly given to the results of cooperative surveys conducted by the organ and tissue transplant registries. Clinical Transplantation: The Journal of Clinical and Translational Research is essential reading for clinicians and researchers in the diverse field of transplantation: surgeons; clinical immunologists; cryobiologists; hematologists; gastroenterologists; hepatologists; pulmonologists; nephrologists; cardiologists; and endocrinologists. It will also be of interest to sociologists, psychologists, research workers, and to all health professionals whose combined efforts will improve the prognosis of transplant recipients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信