Care staff perspectives of clinically meaningful outcomes for dementia residents

IF 4.9 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Alaine E. Reschke-Hernández, Martina Vasil, Emma King, Carson Woolums
{"title":"Care staff perspectives of clinically meaningful outcomes for dementia residents","authors":"Alaine E. Reschke-Hernández,&nbsp;Martina Vasil,&nbsp;Emma King,&nbsp;Carson Woolums","doi":"10.1002/trc2.70091","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> INTRODUCTION</h3>\n \n <p>Non-pharmacological complementary and supportive care programs (CSCP, e.g., music therapy) are provided in addition to standard medical care for persons with dementia (PWD). Care staff observations are critical in assessing the clinical impact of CSCP on PWD. However, little is known about care staff experiences of CSCP and what factors influence documentation of outcomes. We sought to understand how care staff in Kentucky describe the clinically meaningful impact of CSCP on residents and themselves and learn what conditions enable and prohibit documentation.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> METHODS</h3>\n \n <p>Four care staff from four dementia care facilities in Kentucky (representing non-profit, for-profit; rural, suburban, and urban areas) participated in this qualitative multiple case study. Participants were selected to reflect diverse care roles, identities, and experience. We collected data from eight semi-structured interviews (two per participant), 24 journal entries, four observations, photographs, and publicly available facility data. The use of multiple data types helped triangulate findings and enrich the analysis. Data were coded and analyzed for emerging themes.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> RESULTS</h3>\n \n <p>Participants described CSCP as enhancing residents’ holistic well-being and being person-centered. CSCP also improved participants’ well-being and enhanced their sense of purpose. Primary documentation barriers were lack of time, prioritizing resident care over documentation, and top-down regulations. Technology both enabled and prohibited documentation, with routine being a key facilitator.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> DISCUSSION</h3>\n \n <p>Our findings indicate that CSCP improve PWD's quality of life by fostering engagement, joy, and personalized care, consistent with person-centered care principles. Staff also benefit from reduced stress and improved morale. However, barriers exist, including time constraints and documentation challenges. Results may inform directions for future research, translation of CSCP from research to practice, and feasible measurement of clinically meaningful outcomes. The study underscores the importance of addressing systemic issues and advocating for policies that support sustainable, quality dementia care while enhancing both resident and staff well-being.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Highlights</h3>\n \n <div>\n <ul>\n \n <li>Care staff view person-centered care programs as vital for residents' well-being.</li>\n \n <li>Complementary programs reduce burnout and boost morale in demanding care settings.</li>\n \n <li>Feasible documentation is crucial to track meaningful outcomes within time limits.</li>\n \n <li>Results emphasize the need for policies that support care staff and quality care.</li>\n </ul>\n </div>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":53225,"journal":{"name":"Alzheimer''s and Dementia: Translational Research and Clinical Interventions","volume":"11 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/trc2.70091","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alzheimer''s and Dementia: Translational Research and Clinical Interventions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/trc2.70091","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Non-pharmacological complementary and supportive care programs (CSCP, e.g., music therapy) are provided in addition to standard medical care for persons with dementia (PWD). Care staff observations are critical in assessing the clinical impact of CSCP on PWD. However, little is known about care staff experiences of CSCP and what factors influence documentation of outcomes. We sought to understand how care staff in Kentucky describe the clinically meaningful impact of CSCP on residents and themselves and learn what conditions enable and prohibit documentation.

METHODS

Four care staff from four dementia care facilities in Kentucky (representing non-profit, for-profit; rural, suburban, and urban areas) participated in this qualitative multiple case study. Participants were selected to reflect diverse care roles, identities, and experience. We collected data from eight semi-structured interviews (two per participant), 24 journal entries, four observations, photographs, and publicly available facility data. The use of multiple data types helped triangulate findings and enrich the analysis. Data were coded and analyzed for emerging themes.

RESULTS

Participants described CSCP as enhancing residents’ holistic well-being and being person-centered. CSCP also improved participants’ well-being and enhanced their sense of purpose. Primary documentation barriers were lack of time, prioritizing resident care over documentation, and top-down regulations. Technology both enabled and prohibited documentation, with routine being a key facilitator.

DISCUSSION

Our findings indicate that CSCP improve PWD's quality of life by fostering engagement, joy, and personalized care, consistent with person-centered care principles. Staff also benefit from reduced stress and improved morale. However, barriers exist, including time constraints and documentation challenges. Results may inform directions for future research, translation of CSCP from research to practice, and feasible measurement of clinically meaningful outcomes. The study underscores the importance of addressing systemic issues and advocating for policies that support sustainable, quality dementia care while enhancing both resident and staff well-being.

Highlights

  • Care staff view person-centered care programs as vital for residents' well-being.
  • Complementary programs reduce burnout and boost morale in demanding care settings.
  • Feasible documentation is crucial to track meaningful outcomes within time limits.
  • Results emphasize the need for policies that support care staff and quality care.

Abstract Image

护理人员对痴呆症患者临床有意义结果的看法
除了标准的医疗护理外,还为痴呆症患者提供非药物补充和支持性护理方案(CSCP,例如音乐治疗)。护理人员的观察对于评估CSCP对PWD的临床影响至关重要。然而,对于护理人员的CSCP经历以及影响结果记录的因素知之甚少。我们试图了解肯塔基州的护理人员如何描述CSCP对居民和他们自己的临床有意义的影响,并了解哪些条件允许和禁止记录。方法来自肯塔基州四家痴呆症护理机构的四名护理人员(代表非营利性,营利性;农村,郊区和城市地区)参与了这个定性的多案例研究。参与者被选择来反映不同的护理角色、身份和经验。我们收集了8个半结构化访谈(每个参与者2个)、24个日志条目、4个观察、照片和公开的设施数据。使用多种数据类型有助于三角测量结果并丰富分析。对新出现的主题进行了数据编码和分析。结果被试认为CSCP可以提高居民的整体幸福感和以人为本。CSCP也改善了参与者的幸福感,增强了他们的目标感。主要的文件障碍是缺乏时间,优先考虑住院治疗而不是文件,以及自上而下的法规。技术既支持文档,也禁止文档,而例程是关键的推动者。我们的研究结果表明,CSCP通过培养参与、快乐和个性化护理来改善残疾人的生活质量,这与以人为本的护理原则是一致的。员工的压力也会减少,士气也会提高。然而,存在一些障碍,包括时间限制和文档挑战。研究结果可能为未来的研究方向、CSCP从研究到实践的转化以及临床有意义结果的可行测量提供指导。该研究强调了解决系统性问题和倡导支持可持续、高质量痴呆症护理的政策的重要性,同时提高了住院医生和工作人员的福祉。护理人员认为以人为本的护理计划对居民的福祉至关重要。辅助性项目可以在要求苛刻的护理环境中减少倦怠,提高士气。可行的文件对于在时间限制内跟踪有意义的结果至关重要。结果强调需要制定支持护理人员和高质量护理的政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.10
自引率
2.10%
发文量
134
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: Alzheimer''s & Dementia: Translational Research & Clinical Interventions (TRCI) is a peer-reviewed, open access,journal from the Alzheimer''s Association®. The journal seeks to bridge the full scope of explorations between basic research on drug discovery and clinical studies, validating putative therapies for aging-related chronic brain conditions that affect cognition, motor functions, and other behavioral or clinical symptoms associated with all forms dementia and Alzheimer''s disease. The journal will publish findings from diverse domains of research and disciplines to accelerate the conversion of abstract facts into practical knowledge: specifically, to translate what is learned at the bench into bedside applications. The journal seeks to publish articles that go beyond a singular emphasis on either basic drug discovery research or clinical research. Rather, an important theme of articles will be the linkages between and among the various discrete steps in the complex continuum of therapy development. For rapid communication among a multidisciplinary research audience involving the range of therapeutic interventions, TRCI will consider only original contributions that include feature length research articles, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, brief reports, narrative reviews, commentaries, letters, perspectives, and research news that would advance wide range of interventions to ameliorate symptoms or alter the progression of chronic neurocognitive disorders such as dementia and Alzheimer''s disease. The journal will publish on topics related to medicine, geriatrics, neuroscience, neurophysiology, neurology, psychiatry, clinical psychology, bioinformatics, pharmaco-genetics, regulatory issues, health economics, pharmacoeconomics, and public health policy as these apply to preclinical and clinical research on therapeutics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信