Multiple trauma and shock vital signs as potential for improved outcome in patients with severe head trauma

IF 1.5 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Yuya Imanishi, Makoto Ohtake, Taisuke Akimoto, Takafumi Kawasaki, Masaki Yasuda, Kaoru Shizawa, Jun Suenaga, Takashi Kawasaki, Katsumi Sakata, Ichiro Takeuchi, Tetsuya Yamamoto
{"title":"Multiple trauma and shock vital signs as potential for improved outcome in patients with severe head trauma","authors":"Yuya Imanishi,&nbsp;Makoto Ohtake,&nbsp;Taisuke Akimoto,&nbsp;Takafumi Kawasaki,&nbsp;Masaki Yasuda,&nbsp;Kaoru Shizawa,&nbsp;Jun Suenaga,&nbsp;Takashi Kawasaki,&nbsp;Katsumi Sakata,&nbsp;Ichiro Takeuchi,&nbsp;Tetsuya Yamamoto","doi":"10.1002/ams2.70058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>To evaluate the prognostic factors in severe head trauma patients (Glasgow Coma Score (GCS) ≤ 8) with all trauma, including those with trunk injury as well as single severe head trauma (abbreviated injury scale (AIS) ≥ 3).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We included 152 consecutive patients with head trauma (AIS ≥ 3) and consciousness disorders (GCS ≤ 8) who were transported to our institute from January 2017 to October 2022. Data on the patients' background, vital signs at presentation, multiple trauma (AIS ≥ 3 in two or more locations), surgical intervention, and hematological findings were examined; a retrospective analysis was conducted with the modified Rankin Scale score after 3 months assigned as the primary outcome.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The patients' mean age was 57.6 ± 23.4 years (0–89), 49 patients (32.2%) had multiple trauma, and 25 patients (16.4%) had accompanying shock vital signs. In the multivariate analysis of prognosis, age (<i>p</i> = 0.0007) and D-dimer levels (<i>p</i> = 0.0007) were independent poor prognostic factors. On the contrary, patients with multiple trauma (<i>p</i> = 0.027) and shock vital signs at presentation (<i>p</i> = 0.037) had a significantly better prognosis. In the non-shock group, 97.6% (41/42) of patients aged ≥50 years and with D-dimer level of 40 μg/mL or higher had a poor prognosis after 3 months.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Advanced age and high D-dimer levels are important independent associated factors in patients with severe consciousness disorder associated with head trauma; meanwhile, the prognosis is more favorable in patients whose consciousness disorders are associated with multiple trauma or circulatory failure, indicating that rapid improvement of circulatory failure may lead to better outcomes.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":7196,"journal":{"name":"Acute Medicine & Surgery","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ams2.70058","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acute Medicine & Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ams2.70058","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim

To evaluate the prognostic factors in severe head trauma patients (Glasgow Coma Score (GCS) ≤ 8) with all trauma, including those with trunk injury as well as single severe head trauma (abbreviated injury scale (AIS) ≥ 3).

Methods

We included 152 consecutive patients with head trauma (AIS ≥ 3) and consciousness disorders (GCS ≤ 8) who were transported to our institute from January 2017 to October 2022. Data on the patients' background, vital signs at presentation, multiple trauma (AIS ≥ 3 in two or more locations), surgical intervention, and hematological findings were examined; a retrospective analysis was conducted with the modified Rankin Scale score after 3 months assigned as the primary outcome.

Results

The patients' mean age was 57.6 ± 23.4 years (0–89), 49 patients (32.2%) had multiple trauma, and 25 patients (16.4%) had accompanying shock vital signs. In the multivariate analysis of prognosis, age (p = 0.0007) and D-dimer levels (p = 0.0007) were independent poor prognostic factors. On the contrary, patients with multiple trauma (p = 0.027) and shock vital signs at presentation (p = 0.037) had a significantly better prognosis. In the non-shock group, 97.6% (41/42) of patients aged ≥50 years and with D-dimer level of 40 μg/mL or higher had a poor prognosis after 3 months.

Conclusion

Advanced age and high D-dimer levels are important independent associated factors in patients with severe consciousness disorder associated with head trauma; meanwhile, the prognosis is more favorable in patients whose consciousness disorders are associated with multiple trauma or circulatory failure, indicating that rapid improvement of circulatory failure may lead to better outcomes.

Abstract Image

多重创伤和休克生命体征可能改善严重头部创伤患者的预后
目的探讨重型颅脑外伤患者(格拉斯哥昏迷评分(GCS)≤8分)的预后影响因素,包括合并躯干损伤及单发重型颅脑外伤(AIS)≥3分)。方法纳入2017年1月至2022年10月收治的152例头部外伤(AIS≥3)和意识障碍(GCS≤8)患者。检查了患者的背景、就诊时的生命体征、多发创伤(2处或2处以上AIS≥3)、手术干预和血液学结果等数据;以3个月后的修正Rankin量表评分为主要终点进行回顾性分析。结果患者平均年龄57.6±23.4岁(0 ~ 89岁),多发伤49例(32.2%),伴有休克生命体征25例(16.4%)。在多因素预后分析中,年龄(p = 0.0007)和d -二聚体水平(p = 0.0007)是独立的预后不良因素。相反,多发创伤(p = 0.027)和首发时休克生命体征(p = 0.037)的患者预后明显较好。非休克组中,97.6%(41/42)年龄≥50岁、d -二聚体水平≥40 μg/mL的患者3个月后预后不良。结论高龄和高d -二聚体水平是颅脑外伤合并严重意识障碍的重要独立相关因素;同时,意识障碍合并多重创伤或循环衰竭的患者预后更佳,提示循环衰竭的快速改善可能会带来更好的预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acute Medicine & Surgery
Acute Medicine & Surgery MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
自引率
12.50%
发文量
87
审稿时长
53 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信