Reliability of Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption-Ionisation Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry as a Method for Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis Gene Identification

IF 2.9 4区 医学 Q2 Medicine
Kaishun Zhao, Wei Wei, Lijia Yang, Wei Chen, Haiying Liang, Ye Jin, Yameng Sun, Jun Xu, Yanfang Yu
{"title":"Reliability of Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption-Ionisation Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry as a Method for Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis Gene Identification","authors":"Kaishun Zhao,&nbsp;Wei Wei,&nbsp;Lijia Yang,&nbsp;Wei Chen,&nbsp;Haiying Liang,&nbsp;Ye Jin,&nbsp;Yameng Sun,&nbsp;Jun Xu,&nbsp;Yanfang Yu","doi":"10.1111/1440-1681.70038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Instances of drug-resistant tuberculosis (TB), particularly multidrug- and extensive drug-resistant TB, are escalating worldwide; therefore, there is an urgent need to explore suitable treatment strategies. This study assessed the precision of matrix-assisted laser desorption-ionisation time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) in detecting drug-resistant TB. We developed a multiplex MALDI-TOF MS detection assay that concurrently identifies 51 gene mutations for six commonly used medications: rifampicin (RFP), isoniazid (INH), levofloxacin (LVX), moxifloxacin (MOX), capreomycin (CPM) and amikacin (AMK). Subsequently, we evaluated the accuracy of the system by testing clinical sputum samples with known (<i>n</i> = 45) and unknown (<i>n</i> = 254) minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs), using Sanger-sequenced genes as references. The detection system exhibited a minimum sensitivity of 88.00% and a specificity of 95.24% for the 45 known isolates. Similarly, for the 254 unknown samples, the detection system demonstrated sensitivity and specificity for mutations associated with each medication as follows: RFP—sensitivity: 98.97%, specificity: 99.36%; INH—sensitivity: 97.80%, specificity: 100.00%; LVX and MOX—sensitivity: 97.14%, specificity: 100.00%; AMK and CPM—sensitivity: 100.00%, specificity: 100.00%. The unknown samples also displayed favourable sensitivity and specificity values in the MIC validation as follows: RFP—sensitivity: 92.39%, specificity: 92.59%; INH—sensitivity: 75.21%, specificity: 99.27%; LVX—sensitivity: 75.28%, specificity: 99.39%; MOX—sensitivity: 73.24%, specificity: 91.26%; AMK—sensitivity: 94.87%, specificity: 96.74%; CPM—sensitivity: 89.47%, specificity: 95.83%. Meanwhile, our study allows for the identification of the <i>Mycobacterium tuberculosis</i> complex (MTBC). The MALDI-TOF MS exhibited remarkable accuracy in the detection of drug-resistant TB, making it a potential alternative approach for clinical TB diagnosis.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50684,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Experimental Pharmacology and Physiology","volume":"52 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Experimental Pharmacology and Physiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1440-1681.70038","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Instances of drug-resistant tuberculosis (TB), particularly multidrug- and extensive drug-resistant TB, are escalating worldwide; therefore, there is an urgent need to explore suitable treatment strategies. This study assessed the precision of matrix-assisted laser desorption-ionisation time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) in detecting drug-resistant TB. We developed a multiplex MALDI-TOF MS detection assay that concurrently identifies 51 gene mutations for six commonly used medications: rifampicin (RFP), isoniazid (INH), levofloxacin (LVX), moxifloxacin (MOX), capreomycin (CPM) and amikacin (AMK). Subsequently, we evaluated the accuracy of the system by testing clinical sputum samples with known (n = 45) and unknown (n = 254) minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs), using Sanger-sequenced genes as references. The detection system exhibited a minimum sensitivity of 88.00% and a specificity of 95.24% for the 45 known isolates. Similarly, for the 254 unknown samples, the detection system demonstrated sensitivity and specificity for mutations associated with each medication as follows: RFP—sensitivity: 98.97%, specificity: 99.36%; INH—sensitivity: 97.80%, specificity: 100.00%; LVX and MOX—sensitivity: 97.14%, specificity: 100.00%; AMK and CPM—sensitivity: 100.00%, specificity: 100.00%. The unknown samples also displayed favourable sensitivity and specificity values in the MIC validation as follows: RFP—sensitivity: 92.39%, specificity: 92.59%; INH—sensitivity: 75.21%, specificity: 99.27%; LVX—sensitivity: 75.28%, specificity: 99.39%; MOX—sensitivity: 73.24%, specificity: 91.26%; AMK—sensitivity: 94.87%, specificity: 96.74%; CPM—sensitivity: 89.47%, specificity: 95.83%. Meanwhile, our study allows for the identification of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTBC). The MALDI-TOF MS exhibited remarkable accuracy in the detection of drug-resistant TB, making it a potential alternative approach for clinical TB diagnosis.

Abstract Image

基质辅助激光解吸-电离飞行时间质谱法作为耐药结核基因鉴定方法的可靠性
耐药结核病,特别是多药和广泛耐药结核病的病例在世界范围内不断升级;因此,迫切需要探索合适的治疗策略。本研究评估了基质辅助激光解吸-电离飞行时间质谱(MALDI-TOF MS)检测耐药结核病的精度。我们开发了一种多重MALDI-TOF质谱检测方法,可同时识别6种常用药物的51个基因突变:利福平(RFP)、异烟肼(INH)、左氧氟沙星(LVX)、莫西沙星(MOX)、卷曲霉素(CPM)和阿米卡星(AMK)。随后,我们使用sanger测序基因作为参考,通过检测已知(n = 45)和未知(n = 254)最低抑菌浓度(mic)的临床痰样本来评估该系统的准确性。该检测系统对45株已知分离株的灵敏度最低为88.00%,特异性最低为95.24%。同样,对于254份未知样本,检测系统对每种药物相关突变的敏感性和特异性如下:rfp敏感性为98.97%,特异性为99.36%;inh敏感性:97.80%,特异性:100.00%;LVX和mox敏感性:97.14%,特异性:100.00%;AMK和cpm敏感性:100.00%,特异性:100.00%。未知样品在MIC验证中也显示出良好的敏感性和特异性值,rfp敏感性为92.39%,特异性为92.59%;inh敏感性:75.21%,特异性:99.27%;lvx敏感性:75.28%,特异性:99.39%;mox敏感性:73.24%,特异性:91.26%;amk敏感性:94.87%,特异性:96.74%;cpm敏感性:89.47%,特异性:95.83%。同时,我们的研究允许鉴定结核分枝杆菌复合体(MTBC)。MALDI-TOF质谱在检测耐药结核病方面表现出显著的准确性,使其成为临床结核病诊断的潜在替代方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
128
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Clinical and Experimental Pharmacology and Physiology is an international journal founded in 1974 by Mike Rand, Austin Doyle, John Coghlan and Paul Korner. Our focus is new frontiers in physiology and pharmacology, emphasizing the translation of basic research to clinical practice. We publish original articles, invited reviews and our exciting, cutting-edge Frontiers-in-Research series’.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信