Wenyu Zhou , Johannes Kulenkampff , Daniel Jara Heredia , Thorsten Schäfer , Cornelius Fischer
{"title":"Variability of fracture surface roughness in crystalline host rocks: implications for transport model simplifications","authors":"Wenyu Zhou , Johannes Kulenkampff , Daniel Jara Heredia , Thorsten Schäfer , Cornelius Fischer","doi":"10.1016/j.apgeochem.2025.106401","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Variability in fracture geometry and its complex surface characteristics are major contributors to solute transport and retention effects in rocks such as granite. Understanding the effects of cross-scale fracture geometry on solute transport modeling is critical for reliable quantitative predictions in applications such as geothermal energy use and nuclear repository safety. Here, we systematically investigated the sensitivity of fracture surface topography variability to the flow field and solute transport behavior. Specifically, we investigated the role of multiscale fracture surface roughness in solute transport modeling. As a starting point, our study utilized a 3D fracture geometry derived from CT scans and employed COMSOL Multiphysics software for solute transport modeling. By introducing increasingly lower spatially resolved geometries, while maintaining a constant high resolution mesh for simulation calculations, we investigated the consequences for transport on surfaces composed of superimposed building blocks of different sizes and shapes. The results indicate that fracture geometry simplifications with reduced spatial frequency information of well-defined, specific domains do not have a clear trend to alter the BTCs tailing. Instead, this type of model simplification can cause both increased and decreased tracer residence times, leading to misleading interpretations. We explain this by a complex superposition of surface building blocks of different sizes, such as single crystal surface pits, grain boundaries between crystals, and fracture curvature. For model sensitivity analyses, we suggest the use of concentration difference and acceleration maps to identify local transport heterogeneities introduced by geometric simplifications. In addition, we conclude that power spectral density (PSD) analysis provides a means of defining a range of surface spatial frequencies that helps to avoid oversimplification in geometric models of reactive transport.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8064,"journal":{"name":"Applied Geochemistry","volume":"186 ","pages":"Article 106401"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Geochemistry","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0883292725001246","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Variability in fracture geometry and its complex surface characteristics are major contributors to solute transport and retention effects in rocks such as granite. Understanding the effects of cross-scale fracture geometry on solute transport modeling is critical for reliable quantitative predictions in applications such as geothermal energy use and nuclear repository safety. Here, we systematically investigated the sensitivity of fracture surface topography variability to the flow field and solute transport behavior. Specifically, we investigated the role of multiscale fracture surface roughness in solute transport modeling. As a starting point, our study utilized a 3D fracture geometry derived from CT scans and employed COMSOL Multiphysics software for solute transport modeling. By introducing increasingly lower spatially resolved geometries, while maintaining a constant high resolution mesh for simulation calculations, we investigated the consequences for transport on surfaces composed of superimposed building blocks of different sizes and shapes. The results indicate that fracture geometry simplifications with reduced spatial frequency information of well-defined, specific domains do not have a clear trend to alter the BTCs tailing. Instead, this type of model simplification can cause both increased and decreased tracer residence times, leading to misleading interpretations. We explain this by a complex superposition of surface building blocks of different sizes, such as single crystal surface pits, grain boundaries between crystals, and fracture curvature. For model sensitivity analyses, we suggest the use of concentration difference and acceleration maps to identify local transport heterogeneities introduced by geometric simplifications. In addition, we conclude that power spectral density (PSD) analysis provides a means of defining a range of surface spatial frequencies that helps to avoid oversimplification in geometric models of reactive transport.
期刊介绍:
Applied Geochemistry is an international journal devoted to publication of original research papers, rapid research communications and selected review papers in geochemistry and urban geochemistry which have some practical application to an aspect of human endeavour, such as the preservation of the environment, health, waste disposal and the search for resources. Papers on applications of inorganic, organic and isotope geochemistry and geochemical processes are therefore welcome provided they meet the main criterion. Spatial and temporal monitoring case studies are only of interest to our international readership if they present new ideas of broad application.
Topics covered include: (1) Environmental geochemistry (including natural and anthropogenic aspects, and protection and remediation strategies); (2) Hydrogeochemistry (surface and groundwater); (3) Medical (urban) geochemistry; (4) The search for energy resources (in particular unconventional oil and gas or emerging metal resources); (5) Energy exploitation (in particular geothermal energy and CCS); (6) Upgrading of energy and mineral resources where there is a direct geochemical application; and (7) Waste disposal, including nuclear waste disposal.