Agitation management strategies for older adults in the emergency department or with emergency medical services: A scoping review

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Fatima I. Shah BSc (Hons) , Grace Lew BHSc (Hons) , Zeeshan Chawdhry , Krista Reich MD, MSc , Kathryn Crowder MD , Diane L. Lorenzetti PhD , Margaret McGillivray BSc, M.D, CCFP (EM and COE) , Zahra Goodarzi BHSc (Hon). MD. MSc. FRCPC
{"title":"Agitation management strategies for older adults in the emergency department or with emergency medical services: A scoping review","authors":"Fatima I. Shah BSc (Hons) ,&nbsp;Grace Lew BHSc (Hons) ,&nbsp;Zeeshan Chawdhry ,&nbsp;Krista Reich MD, MSc ,&nbsp;Kathryn Crowder MD ,&nbsp;Diane L. Lorenzetti PhD ,&nbsp;Margaret McGillivray BSc, M.D, CCFP (EM and COE) ,&nbsp;Zahra Goodarzi BHSc (Hon). MD. MSc. FRCPC","doi":"10.1016/j.ajem.2025.04.019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Agitation is common in the emergency department (ED) and with emergency medical services (EMS), which can pose significant challenges to safety and patient care. In older adults, agitation is a common symptom of dementia or delirium.</div></div><div><h3>Rationale</h3><div>Managing agitation in older adults is challenging in emergency care environments. A scoping review of literature for agitation management approaches for older adults in ED/EMS environments was completed.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We searched Medline, Embase, and APA PsycINFO, combining key words and subject headings for 3 concepts: “older adults, aged 65 and older,” “agitation/dementia/delirium,” and “ED/EMS.” Studies which explored management strategies for older adults with agitation, dementia, or delirium in the ED or EMS were included. Studies with younger populations (&lt;65 years old) and/or lacking patient data specifically from the ED or EMS were excluded.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 7113 studies were screened, of which 22 were included in this review: pharmacological (<em>n</em> = 8), non-pharmacological (<em>n</em> = 5), multi-component (<em>n</em> = 3) treatments, and recommendations (<em>n</em> = 6). Most were in the ED, and 5038 older adults were included across all studies. Antipsychotics and benzodiazepines to manage agitation were common. Non-pharmacological and multi-component interventions were less commonly evaluated and lacked exploration of patient outcomes. Recommendations stressed caution with pharmacological medications rather than prioritizing non-restraint strategies.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>Most studies identified use of pharmacological treatment for agitation amongst older adults in ED/EMS settings, however, are not found to be overly effective and are associated with patient harm. There is a significant gap in evidence specific to EMS settings and evaluation of effectiveness of non-pharmacological interventions, highlighting the need for further research.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55536,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":"94 ","pages":"Pages 81-95"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0735675725002529","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Agitation is common in the emergency department (ED) and with emergency medical services (EMS), which can pose significant challenges to safety and patient care. In older adults, agitation is a common symptom of dementia or delirium.

Rationale

Managing agitation in older adults is challenging in emergency care environments. A scoping review of literature for agitation management approaches for older adults in ED/EMS environments was completed.

Methods

We searched Medline, Embase, and APA PsycINFO, combining key words and subject headings for 3 concepts: “older adults, aged 65 and older,” “agitation/dementia/delirium,” and “ED/EMS.” Studies which explored management strategies for older adults with agitation, dementia, or delirium in the ED or EMS were included. Studies with younger populations (<65 years old) and/or lacking patient data specifically from the ED or EMS were excluded.

Results

A total of 7113 studies were screened, of which 22 were included in this review: pharmacological (n = 8), non-pharmacological (n = 5), multi-component (n = 3) treatments, and recommendations (n = 6). Most were in the ED, and 5038 older adults were included across all studies. Antipsychotics and benzodiazepines to manage agitation were common. Non-pharmacological and multi-component interventions were less commonly evaluated and lacked exploration of patient outcomes. Recommendations stressed caution with pharmacological medications rather than prioritizing non-restraint strategies.

Discussion

Most studies identified use of pharmacological treatment for agitation amongst older adults in ED/EMS settings, however, are not found to be overly effective and are associated with patient harm. There is a significant gap in evidence specific to EMS settings and evaluation of effectiveness of non-pharmacological interventions, highlighting the need for further research.
急诊科或急诊医疗服务的老年人躁动管理策略:范围审查
在急诊科(ED)和紧急医疗服务(EMS)中,躁动很常见,这可能对安全和患者护理构成重大挑战。在老年人中,躁动是痴呆或谵妄的常见症状。在紧急护理环境中管理老年人的躁动具有挑战性。我们完成了对ED/EMS环境中老年人躁动管理方法的文献综述。方法检索Medline、Embase和APA PsycINFO,结合关键词和主题标题,获得3个概念:“老年人,65岁及以上”、“躁动/痴呆/谵妄”和“ED/EMS”。研究探讨了在急诊科或EMS中患有躁动、痴呆或谵妄的老年人的管理策略。排除了年龄较小的人群(65岁)和/或缺乏来自急诊科或EMS的患者数据的研究。结果共筛选了7113项研究,其中22项纳入本综述:药理学(n = 8)、非药理学(n = 5)、多组分治疗(n = 3)和推荐治疗(n = 6)。大多数研究在ED中进行,所有研究共纳入5038名老年人。抗精神病药物和苯二氮卓类药物用于控制躁动是常见的。非药物和多组分干预较少被评估,缺乏对患者结果的探索。建议强调谨慎的药物治疗,而不是优先考虑非约束策略。大多数研究确定在ED/EMS环境中使用药物治疗老年人躁动,然而,没有发现过度有效,并且与患者伤害相关。在EMS设置和评估非药物干预有效性的证据方面存在重大差距,这突出了进一步研究的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
5.60%
发文量
730
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: A distinctive blend of practicality and scholarliness makes the American Journal of Emergency Medicine a key source for information on emergency medical care. Covering all activities concerned with emergency medicine, it is the journal to turn to for information to help increase the ability to understand, recognize and treat emergency conditions. Issues contain clinical articles, case reports, review articles, editorials, international notes, book reviews and more.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信