Cross-cultural adaptation of the women's experience of vaginal examination in labour scale in the Brazilian cultural context

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Eliane Traebert , Gustavo A.O. Ávila , Cecília Favero , Mariana F. Velho , Daisson J. Trevisol , Fabiana Schuelter-Trevisol , Gabriel O. Cremona-Parma , Jefferson Traebert
{"title":"Cross-cultural adaptation of the women's experience of vaginal examination in labour scale in the Brazilian cultural context","authors":"Eliane Traebert ,&nbsp;Gustavo A.O. Ávila ,&nbsp;Cecília Favero ,&nbsp;Mariana F. Velho ,&nbsp;Daisson J. Trevisol ,&nbsp;Fabiana Schuelter-Trevisol ,&nbsp;Gabriel O. Cremona-Parma ,&nbsp;Jefferson Traebert","doi":"10.1016/j.midw.2025.104427","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To carry out the cross-cultural adaptation of the Women's Experience of Vaginal Examination in Labour scale in the Brazilian cultural context and to evaluate the psychometric properties of the proposed version.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The stages of cross-cultural adaptation were carried out. The pre-test version was applied to 10 primiparous women in the immediate postpartum period who gave birth to full-term newborns via vaginal delivery with cephalic presentation. To assess reliability and validity, the final proposed version was administered to 200 women with the same characteristics in a cross-sectional study. Data were analyzed using exploratory factor analysis with principal component extraction and Item Response Theory.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The Brazilian version of the scale was obtained following rigorous adherence to all stages. In the reliability analysis, the Brazilian version scale presented a Cronbach's α of 0.909. Factor analysis with principal component extraction showed closely distributed factors, explaining 66.5 % of the variance. The Item Response Theory analysis indicated that the probability of selecting a particular response varies depending on the intensity of the latent trait.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>A valid and reliable Brazilian version of the Women's Experience of Vaginal Examination in Labour scale was obtained.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":18495,"journal":{"name":"Midwifery","volume":"147 ","pages":"Article 104427"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Midwifery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0266613825001457","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To carry out the cross-cultural adaptation of the Women's Experience of Vaginal Examination in Labour scale in the Brazilian cultural context and to evaluate the psychometric properties of the proposed version.

Methods

The stages of cross-cultural adaptation were carried out. The pre-test version was applied to 10 primiparous women in the immediate postpartum period who gave birth to full-term newborns via vaginal delivery with cephalic presentation. To assess reliability and validity, the final proposed version was administered to 200 women with the same characteristics in a cross-sectional study. Data were analyzed using exploratory factor analysis with principal component extraction and Item Response Theory.

Results

The Brazilian version of the scale was obtained following rigorous adherence to all stages. In the reliability analysis, the Brazilian version scale presented a Cronbach's α of 0.909. Factor analysis with principal component extraction showed closely distributed factors, explaining 66.5 % of the variance. The Item Response Theory analysis indicated that the probability of selecting a particular response varies depending on the intensity of the latent trait.

Conclusion

A valid and reliable Brazilian version of the Women's Experience of Vaginal Examination in Labour scale was obtained.
巴西文化背景下劳动规模下女性阴道检查经验的跨文化适应
目的对《分娩女性阴道检查经历》量表在巴西文化背景下进行跨文化改编,并评价拟编量表的心理测量学特征。方法进行跨文化适应阶段研究。预测试版本应用于10名产后刚分娩的孕妇,她们通过阴道分娩生下足月新生儿,头位呈现。为了评估信度和效度,在横断面研究中对200名具有相同特征的女性进行了最终的建议版本。采用探索性因子分析、主成分提取和项目反应理论对数据进行分析。结果在严格遵守所有阶段后获得了巴西版量表。在信度分析中,巴西版量表的Cronbach’s α为0.909。主成分提取的因子分析表明,各因子分布紧密,解释了66.5%的方差。项目反应理论分析表明,选择特定反应的概率取决于潜在特质的强度。结论获得了一份有效、可靠的巴西版《分娩时妇女阴道检查经验》。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Midwifery
Midwifery 医学-护理
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
7.40%
发文量
221
审稿时长
13.4 weeks
期刊介绍: Midwifery publishes the latest peer reviewed international research to inform the safety, quality, outcomes and experiences of pregnancy, birth and maternity care for childbearing women, their babies and families. The journal’s publications support midwives and maternity care providers to explore and develop their knowledge, skills and attitudes informed by best available evidence. Midwifery provides an international, interdisciplinary forum for the publication, dissemination and discussion of advances in evidence, controversies and current research, and promotes continuing education through publication of systematic and other scholarly reviews and updates. Midwifery articles cover the cultural, clinical, psycho-social, sociological, epidemiological, education, managerial, workforce, organizational and technological areas of practice in preconception, maternal and infant care. The journal welcomes the highest quality scholarly research that employs rigorous methodology. Midwifery is a leading international journal in midwifery and maternal health with a current impact factor of 1.861 (© Thomson Reuters Journal Citation Reports 2016) and employs a double-blind peer review process.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信